1. What do customers want? The impact of pricing tactic persuasion knowledge and frequency of exposure
- Author
-
Yen-Ting Chen, Wen-Chang Fang, and Li-Chi Lan
- Subjects
0303 health sciences ,Persuasion ,Virtue ,030309 nutrition & dietetics ,media_common.quotation_subject ,05 social sciences ,Advertising ,Price discount ,Purchasing ,Product (business) ,03 medical and health sciences ,0502 economics and business ,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous) ,Product management ,050211 marketing ,Psychology ,Food Science ,media_common - Abstract
PurposePrevious research has shown that consumers prefer a bonus pack to a price discount for virtue foods, whereas they prefer a price discount to a bonus pack for vice foods. Acting as a guilt-mitigating mechanism, a price discount justifies consumers' purchasing behavior, allowing them to save money and consume less vice foods. However, for virtue foods, neither the anticipated post-consumption guilt nor the resulting need for justification lead consumers to prefer a bonus pack to a price discount. This study investigates whether product promotions remain effective with other moderating variables.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use pricing tactic persuasion knowledge (PTPK), which refers to the consumer persuasion knowledge of marketers' pricing tactics, as a lens to understand whether the power of these promotions could be enhanced or mitigated. The authors inferred that increasing the frequency of exposure to these foods could positively influence consumers' purchasing choices. They conducted three studies to examine these effects. In Study 1, using pearl milk tea (vice food) and sugar-free tea (virtue food), the authors contended that consumers would prefer a price discount when purchasing pearl milk tea, but a bonus pack when purchasing sugar-free tea. In Studies 2 and 3, the authors varied the participants' frequency of exposure to photographs of people in everyday situations with vice (virtue) foods.FindingsIn Study 1, PTPK was shown to be more predictive of consumer choices regarding price discounts and bonus packs. In Studies 2 and 3, the authors contended that increased exposure to vice (virtue) foods increases the selection of vice (virtue) foods by participants who were unaware of having been exposed to vice (virtue) foods.Originality/valueThis research has not only made quite managerial and policy implications for marketing but also brought the theoretical contributions for marketing researches. This research demonstrates that either for vice foods or virtue foods, a price discount is preferred to a bonus pack.
- Published
- 2021