Search

Purpose of reviewThis mini-review is aimed to provide an overview and discuss procedural sedation and analgesia for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation with focus at qualification of staff, patient evaluation, monitoring, medication and postprocedural care.Recent findingsSleep-disordered breathing is highly prevalent in patients with AF. Impact of often used STOP-BANG questionnaire to detect sleep-disordered breathing in AF patients is limited due to its restricted validity. Dexmedetomidine is a commonly used drug in sedation, but is shown not to be superior to propofol in sedation during AF-ablation. Alternatively use of remimazolam has characteristics that makes it a promising drug for minimal to moderate sedation for AF-ablation. High flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) has shown to reduce the risk of desaturation in adults receiving procedural sedation and analgesia.An optimal sedation strategy during AF ablation should be based on AF patient characteristics, the level of sedation needed, the procedure (duration and type of ablation) and the education and experience of the sedation provider. Patient evaluation and post procedural care are part of sedation care. More personalized care based on use of various sedation strategies and types of drugs as related to the type of AF-ablation is the way to further optimize care.

Ultra-low temperature cryoablation (ULTC) is a novel ablation modality aiming to combine the effectiveness of surgical lesion delivery with percutaneous safety to improve outcomes in catheter ablations of atrial fibrillation, particularly in persistent AF (PsAF). In the Cryocure-2 study (NCT02839304) 78 patients (56.4% PsAF) received ULTC pulmonary vein isolation plus posterior wall ablation, and linear left and right atrial lesions as needed. The safety and acute success of ULTC appear consistent with current catheter ablation techniques and, together with Kaplan-Meier 85.9% 1-year freedom from AF observed in Cryocure-2 PsAF patients, warrant further evaluation in larger clinical trials, which are currently ongoing.

Background Atrial septal defect (ASD) is associated with a risk of developing atrial fibrillation (AF) higher than in the general population, even after percutaneous or surgical septal closure. Catheter ablation is an effective treatment strategy for preventing recurrences and reducing the AF burden. However, electrophysiologists are faced with technical difficulties and the risk of complications with the left atrium access in patients with prior ASD percutaneous closure. Case summary We report a case of a patient with highly symptomatic paroxysmal AF, with an ASD, closed percutaneously many years before, who underwent a successful catheter AF ablation, using a single transeptal (TSP) approach guided by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Discussion In patients with ASD and an occluder device implanted, there is a potential risk for septal tear during the TSP passage, device dislodgement, or thrombus formation on the device. Atrial fibrillation ablation in this subset of patients has often been protracted and scarcely reported. TEE and intra-cardiac echocardiography have been increasingly used for interventional procedure guidance during AF ablation. As described here, AF ablation using a simplified single TSP guided by TEE is feasible, safe, and effective after device ASD closure.

Introduction: Transcatheter atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is still carried out with continuous invasive radial arterial blood pressure (IBP) monitoring in many centers. Continuous noninvasive blood pressure (CNBP) measurement using the volume-clamp method is a noninvasive alternative method used in ICU. No data on CNBP reliability are available in the electrophysiology lab during AF ablation, where rhythm variations are common. Background: The objective of the present study was to compare continuous noninvasive arterial pressure measured with the ClearSight device (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) with invasive radial artery pressure used as the reference method during AF ablation. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 55 consecutive patients (age 62 ± 11 years, 80% male) undergoing transcatheter AF ablation (62% paroxysmal, 38% persistent) at our center. Standard of care IBP monitoring via a radial cannula and a contralateral noninvasive finger volume-clamp CNBP measurement device were positioned simultaneously in all patients for the entire procedure. Bland-Altman analysis was used to analyze the agreement between the two techniques. Results: A total of 1219 paired measurements for systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure were obtained in 55 subjects, with a mean (SD) of 22 (9) measurements per patient. The mean bias (SD) was −12.97 (13.89) mmHg for systolic pressure (level of agreement −14.24–40.20; correlation coefficient 0.84), −1.85 (8.52) mmHg for diastolic pressure (level of agreement −18.54–14.84; correlation coefficient 0.77) and 2.31 (8.75) mmHg for mean pressure (level of agreement −14.84–19.46; correlation coefficient 0.85). Conclusion: In patients undergoing AF ablation, CNBP monitoring with the ClearSight device showed acceptable agreement with IBP monitoring. Larger studies are needed to confirm the potential clinical implications of continuous noninvasive BP monitoring during AF ablation.

Background Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggest that ablation is superior to antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) as an initial therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pAF) to prevent arrhythmia recurrences. We performed an updated meta‐analysis of RCTs, to include recent data from cryoballoon‐based ablation and to compare arrhythmia‐free survival and adverse events between ablation and AADs. Methods We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to December 2020. We included RCT comparing patients with pAF undergoing ablation or receiving AADs as an initial therapy. We combined data using the random‐effects model to calculate hazards ratio (HR) for arrhythmia‐free survival and odds ratio (OR) for adverse events. Results Five studies from 2005 to 2020 involving 985 patients were included (495 patients and 490 patients underwent ablation and medication as initial therapy, respectively). Patients who underwent ablation had higher freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs) during the 12‐24 months follow‐up period (pooled HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.40‐0.59, P, We performed meta‐analysis of the most recent randomized control trials evaluating atrial fibrillation ablation as the first line therapy

Background The right and left pulmonary artery branches (RPA, LPA) overlie inaccessible left atrial (LA) epicardium, containing the Bachmann bundle (BB), that participate in arrhythmia pathogenesis and offer an opportunity for natural surface epicardial mapping (NSEM). Objective We sought to assess the feasibility of NSEM of BB and LA roof arrhythmias. Methods Electrogram recording, pacing, and ablation was performed in 2 swine. Subsequently, NSEM and pacing from the RPA and LPA was performed in 11 consecutive patients undergoing ablation of atrial fibrillation or flutter. Pacing entrainment and ablation of LA epicardium, from the pulmonary artery (PA), was performed in cases of atypical flutter. Results Swine specimens revealed no vascular disruption and LA epicardial lesions up to 7 mm in diameter and 3 mm in depth. In clinical cases, RPA mapping was performed in 11 (100%) and LPA mapping in 6 (55%) patients. Simultaneous leftward activation of the BB followed by rightward activation of the opposing LA endocardium was recorded during crista pacing. Right and left PA median signal amplitudes were 0.71 mV and 0.30 mV, respectively. Endocardial LA median distance was 9 mm to the RPA and 15.6 mm to the LPA and LA capture was successful in 7 of 8 (88%). In cases of atypical flutter, entrainment was successful in 3 of 3 (100%) and ablation was performed. Conclusion PA NSEM can enable safe recording and entrainment of the BB, providing otherwise inaccessible epicaridal arrhythmia measurements. The safety and efficacy of ablation from the PA requires further study.

Background Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a promising technology based on electroporation. It is unclear if different catheter designs imply efficacy and safety differences. Objective To vary geometry, blood exposure, and energy delivery methods among 3 representative catheter designs, and then compare lesion transmurality, extra-atrial safety, and embolic risk. Methods A computed tomography–derived computer model was used. Balloon, flexible-circuit splined, and circular catheters were placed near the left pulmonary veins. Four energy delivery methods were tested: multi-unipolar, sequential unipolar, interlaced, and wide interlaced. A posterior wall target was defined. Efficacy was defined as percent target with >600 V/cm. Safety aspects included aortic/esophageal electroporation damage and a bubble-generation surrogate (electrode current density), with 90% transmurality requirement. Results Balloon catheters had highest efficacy, followed by flexible polymer splined and circular catheters. On energy delivery methods, the multi-unipolar one was most efficacious, followed by interlaced bipolar and sequential-unipolar ones. Electroporation risks to aorta and esophagus were highest with multi-unipolar energy delivery. Bubble risk was lowest with balloon catheters. Conclusion Computer models show that catheters with electrodes on a balloon surface or on flexible circuit splines are about 4 times more efficacious than circular catheters with electrodes exposed to atrial blood. Multi-unipolar energy delivery methods have a higher risk of electroporating aortic and esophageal tissue, when compared to bipolar interlaced methods. Considering embolic risks, circular catheters had the highest bubble-generating potential. A balloon or flexible circuit splined system with a wide interlaced delivery method showed the best balance in efficacy and safety., Graphical abstract

Background Esophageal injury (EI) remains a concern when performing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the high-power short-duration (HPSD) technique. Objective We aim to indicate that high esophageal temperature during HPSD PVI does not correlate with positive esophageal endoscopy (EGD) findings. Methods A retrospective observational study was performed on 43 patients undergoing PVI using HPSD (50 W for 6–7 seconds per lesion) at Tulane Medical Center from July 2020 to January 2021. Esophageal temperature was monitored throughout the procedure using a temperature probe and patients underwent EGD the following day. Small ulcers, nonbleeding erosions, erythema, and/or esophagitis were considered positive EGD findings. Results Mean age was 64.9 years; 46.5% of the patients were female. Eleven patients had positive EGD findings (group 1) and 32 patients had normal EGD (group 2). There was no statistical difference in mean esophageal peak temperature between group 1 and group 2 (43.9°C ± 2.9°C and 42.5°C ± 2.3°C, respectively, P = .17). There was no association between positive EGD results and esophageal temperature during PVI. Mean baseline esophageal temperature was similar in both groups (36.1°C, P = .78). Average contact force (P = .53), ablation time (P = .67), age (P = .3096), sex (P = .4), body mass index (P = .14), and other comorbidities did not correlate with positive endoscopy results. We found positive correlation between the distance of the left atrium (LA) to esophagus and positive EGD (P = .0001). Conclusion EI during HPSD PVI does not correlate to esophageal temperature changes during ablation. However, esophageal injury does correlate to a shorter proximity of the esophagus to the LA.

Background The hybrid approach has become the most effective treatment option for restoring sinus rhythm and reducing the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. However, several issues remain to be clearly defined, including the appropriate timing of the staged procedure and the most effective strategy. Methods Over a 12-year period of activity, we performed 609 AF ablation procedures via a right mini-thoracotomy. From this general population, 60 patients underwent a hybrid procedure with catheter ablation performed at least 4 weeks after the surgical procedure to confirm if effective complete electrical isolation of pulmonary veins was achieved. In 20 patients, the second stage procedure was performed during the same hospitalization due to patient’s electrical instability. The results obtained in immediate versus staged patients were compared. Results All patients were discharged after the first stage procedure in sinus rhythm. The 20 immediate patients had a shorter hospital stay compared with the staged patients, in whom the two hospitalizations resulted in a longer hospital stay (immediate 5.5 ± 1.6 days versus staged 8.7 ± 1.4, P Conclusion The hybrid approach for the treatment of AF was safe and effective in immediate restoring sinus rhythm and in its maintenance at follow-up. Our preliminary results show that both immediate and staged procedures show similar efficacy but this result is strongly influenced by the concomitant ablation of the Bachmann’s bundle, which appears to be the most important component of the treatment strategy in order to reduce the risk of recurrent AF.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text., Background: Even on optimal therapy, many patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation experience cardiovascular complications. Additional treatments are needed to reduce these events, especially in patients with heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Methods: This prespecified subanalysis of the randomized EAST-AFNET4 trial (Early Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation for Stroke Prevention Trial) assessed the effect of systematic, early rhythm control therapy (ERC; using antiarrhythmic drugs or catheter ablation) compared with usual care (allowing rhythm control therapy to improve symptoms) on the 2 primary outcomes of the trial and on selected secondary outcomes in patients with heart failure, defined as heart failure symptoms New York Heart Association II to III or left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF]

Background As same-day discharge (SDD) after catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasingly utilized, it is important to further investigate this approach. Objective To investigate the safety and efficacy of SDD after CA for AF in a large nationwide administrative sample. Methods The IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database was used to identify adult patients under 65 years undergoing CA for AF (2016–2020). Eligible patients were indexed to date of first CA and classified into SDD or overnight stay (ONS) groups based on length of service. A 1:3 propensity score matching was used to create comparable SDD:ONS samples. Study outcomes were CA-related complications within 30 days after index procedure and AF recurrence within 1 year. Cox proportional hazards models were estimated for outcome comparison. Results In the postmatch 30-day cohort, there were 1610 SDD and 4637 ONS patients with mean age 56.1 (± 7.6) years. There was no significant difference in composite 30-day postprocedural complication rate between SDD and ONS groups (2.7% vs 2.8%, respectively; P = .884). The most common complications were cerebrovascular events (0.7% vs 0.7%; P = .948), vascular access events (0.6% vs 0.6%; P = .935), and pericardial complications (0.6% vs 0.5%; P = .921). Further, no significant difference in composite AF recurrence rate at 1 year was observed among SDD and ONS groups (10.2% vs 8.8%; hazard ratio=1.167; 95% confidence interval 0.935–1.455; P = .172). Conclusion In a large, propensity-matched, real-world sample, SDD appears to be safe and have similar outcomes compared with overnight observation following CA for AF.

Background High-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) is used during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) to increase catheter stability and improve outcomes. In prior studies, hemodynamic intolerance to HFJV was rare. Objectives To evaluate the incidence of hemodynamic or respiratory intolerance of HFJV during PVI. Methods Retrospective observational analysis of consecutive patients undergoing PVI performed by 2 operators (PT, JW) at our institution between February 2019 and June 2020 who developed persistent hypotension or abnormal ventilatory parameters in association with HFJV. Results Among 194 PVIs, there were 8 cases (4%) of conversion from HFJV to conventional ventilation, 6 for refractory hypotension and 2 for persistently abnormal gas exchange. In 6 patients, including 5 of the 6 patients with refractory hypotension, a new, small pericardial effusion without tamponade was noted just after HFJV was initiated. In patients with persistent hypotension, a decrease in left ventricular filling and systolic function was frequently noted. Both the hemodynamic changes and effusion resolved almost immediately after discontinuation of HFJV. In 4 patients rechallenged with HFJV, the hypotension and/or effusion recurred quickly and again resolved immediately after return to conventional ventilation. Conclusion HFJV-associated hypotension and systolic dysfunction, often accompanied by a transient pericardial effusion, is present in a small proportion of patients undergoing PVI, and resolves with cessation of HFJV. The mechanism of these changes is unclear and warrants further study.

Background: Optimal overlap ratio remains unclear in point-by-point laser balloon (LB) ablation. Objective: This study sought to determine the optimal overlap strategy with target energies on the acute and chronic outcomes in LB pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI). Methods: Consecutive 38 patients (148 PVs) with atrial fibrillation underwent the first-generation LB PVI with the following protocols based on the overlap ratios for each PV anterior/posterior wall: 50%/50% (13 patients [49 PVs], group A), 50%/25% (15 patients [60 PVs], group B), and 25%/25% (10 patients [39 PVs], group C). High energies (240–255 J: 12 W / 20 seconds, 8.5 W / 30 seconds), moderate energies (200–210 J: 10 W / 20 seconds, 7 W / 30 seconds), and low-to-moderate energies (low, 165–170 J: 5.5 W / 30 seconds, 8.5 W / 20 seconds) were targeted for left PV anterior walls, right PV anterior walls, and bilateral PV posterior walls, respectively. First-pass PVI, the other procedure-related data, and atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences were analyzed. Results: First-pass PVI rate per PV was higher in group A (94%) than in group B (88%) and group C (62%) (P < .001). All PVs were finally isolated. First-pass time, total LB PVI time, complications, and atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences during a mean follow-up of 11 ± 5 months did not differ between the groups. A few residual gaps after first-pass LB ablations were found for PV anterior walls even in group A and group B. Conclusion: Sufficiently overlapped LB ablation promises a high rate of first-pass PVI without adverse outcomes. High energy could be required for PV anterior walls.

Introduction There are several prognostic scores for the assessment of risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence post ablation procedure. However, the use of these complex scores is difficult and the validation on different populations brought divergent results. Our goal was to compare the performance of these risk scores as the basis for the development of a new, simplified score based only on few universally predictive variables. Methods All cryoballoon‐based AF ablations performed in a single‐center over a 10‐year period were prospectively analyzed with regard to AF recurrence. This served to analyze the performance of APPLE, CAAP‐AF, SCALE‐CryoAF, MB‐LATER, CHADS2, and CHA2DS2‐VASc risk scores. Results A total of 597 patients, mostly (78.1%) with paroxysmal AF were studied. Analyzed risk scores performed poorer than in the original publications because some risk factors were not predictive of AF recurrence. A simplified score named 0‐1‐2 PL, composed of just two universally predictive variables, AF type (1 point for P ersistent AF) and LA dimension (1 point for L A size >45 mm) was developed. The 0‐1‐2 PL score stratified patients into low risk (0 points), intermediate risk (1 point), and high risk categories (2 points) which were related to a 2‐year risk of AF recurrence of 21%, 37%, and 55%, respectively. This score had C‐statistics (0.620) higher/comparable to other investigated much more complex scores. Conclusion The assessment of risk of AF recurrence at the pre‐ablation stage can be simplified without compromising accuracy. This could help to popularize risk assessment and standardization of AF management., This study suggests that despite the significant differences between risk scores in terms of the choice of risk factors and the relative weights assigned to them, their performance for pre‐ablation risk assessment is quite similar, and weaker than originally reported. It seems that the assessment of the risk of AF recurrence at the pre‐ablation stage can be simplified by using the novel 0‐1‐2 PL score instead of more complex scores.

International audience

Electrical isolation of pulmonary veins (PVI) is the cornerstone of invasive treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, arrhythmia-free survival of a PVI only approach is suboptimal in patients with persistent and long-term persistent AF. Hybrid AF ablation has been developed with the aim of combining the advantages of a thoracoscopic surgical ablation (direct visualization of anatomical structures to be spared and the possibility to perform epicardial lesions) and endocardial ablation (possibility to check line block, confirm PVI, and possibility to perform cavotricuspid isthmus ablation). Patient selection is of utmost importance. In persistent and long-term persistent AF, hybrid AF ablation demonstrated promising results in terms of AF free survival. It has been associated with a relatively low complication rate if performed in centers with expertise in hybrid procedures and experience with both surgical and endocardial ablation. Different techniques have been described, with different approaches and lesion sets. The aim of this review is to provide a state-of-the-art overview of hybrid AF ablation.

Background Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has been identified as an alternative to thermal‐based ablation systems for treatment of atrial fibrillation patients. The objective of this Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) study was to characterize the chronic effects and safety of overlapping lesions created by a PFA system at intracardiac locations in a porcine model. Methods A circular catheter with nine gold electrodes was used for overlapping low‐ or high‐dose PFA deliveries in the superior vena cava (SVC), right atrial appendage (RAA), and right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV) in six pigs. Electrical isolation was evaluated acutely and chronic lesions were assessed via necropsy and histopathology after 4‐week survival. Acute and chronic safety data were recorded peri‐ and post‐procedurally. Results No animal experienced ventricular arrhythmia during PFA delivery, and there was no evidence of periprocedural PFA‐related adverse events. Lesions created in all anatomies resulted in electrical isolation postprocedure. Lesions were circumferential, contiguous, and transmural, with all converting into consistent lines of chronic replacement fibrosis, regardless of trabeculated or smooth endocardial surface structure. Ablations were non‐thermally generated with only minimal post‐delivery temperature rises recorded at the electrodes. There was no evidence of extracardiac damage, stenosis, aneurysms, endocardial disruption, or thrombus. Conclusion PFA deliveries to the SVC, RAA, and RSPV resulted in complete circumferential replacement fibrosis at 4‐week postablation with an excellent chronic myocardial and collateral tissue safety profile. This GLP study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a dosage range in preparation for a clinical trial and characterized the non‐thermal nature of PFA.

Introduction Single-shot techniques such as cryoballoon and multipolar phased pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC) are an alternative to the point-by-point radiofrequency method for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. However, there is a lack of data concerning sequential use of single-shot techniques, that is, for both the index and redo ablation. Aim To assess long-term outcomes of the 'single-shot techniques only' AF ablation strategy. Material and methods We analyzed all consecutive AF ablations performed over a 10-year period (2009-2019) in a center where a 'single-shot technique only' principle was followed from the start of the AF ablation program. Kaplan-Meier AF-free survival curves were calculated and complications were assessed on the basis of our prospectively maintained database. Results A total of 597 patients (62.4 ±12.5 years) with paroxysmal (78.1%) or persistent (21.9%) AF entered the study and 655 AF ablation procedures were performed. In 96.5% of redos (n = 58) a different technique (mostly PVAC) was used than for the index ablation (mostly cryoballoon). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of 1, 2 and 5 years freedom from AF were 78.2%, 69.2%, and 56.0%, for the index ablation, and 80.3%, 76.1% and 68.3%, for the redo, respectively. The minor and major complication rates were 8.1%, and 4.0%, respectively. Conclusions An AF ablation program based solely on sequential use of two different single-shot techniques for both index and redo procedures is safe and effective. These observations might have important practical implications for new operators/centers starting AF ablation programs and for use of single-shot techniques for redo procedures.

Introduction Prospective studies on rivaroxaban and apixaban have shown the safety and efficacy of direct anticoagulation agents (DOAC)s used peri-procedurally during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). Studies comparing the two agents have not been performed. Methods Consecutive patients from a prospective registry who underwent RFA of AF between April 2012 and March 2015 and were on apixaban or rivaroxaban were studied. Clinical variables and outcomes were noted. Results There were a total of 358 patients (n = 56 on apixaban and n = 302 on rivaroxaban). There were no differences in baseline characteristics between both groups. The last dose of rivaroxaban was administered the night before the procedure in 96% of patients. In patients on apixaban, 48% of patients whose procedure was in the afternoon took the medication on the morning of the procedure. TIA/CVA occurred in 2 patients (0.6%) in rivaroxaban group with none in apixaban group (p = 0.4). There was no difference in the rate of pericardial effusion between apixaban and rivaroxaban groups [1.7% vs 0.6% (p = 0.4)]. Five percent of patients in both groups had groin complications (p = 0.9). In apixaban group, all groin complications were small hematomas except one patient who had a pseudoaneurysm (1.6%). One pseudo-aneurysm, 1 fistula and 3 large hematomas were noted in patients on rivaroxaban (1.7%) with the rest being small hematomas. DOACs were restarted post procedure typically 4 h post hemostasis. Conclusions Peri-procedural uninterrupted use of apixaban and rivaroxaban during AF RFA is safe and there are no major differences between both groups.

Introduction: Periprocedural oral anticoagulation (OAC) strategies for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures are changing rapidly. Objective: To assess the management and course of periprocedural OAC for AF ablation procedures in experienced electrophysiology (EP) centers in Germany over the last 12 months. Methods: The data are based on an electronic questionnaire, which was sent to 35 experienced EP centers in September 2018 and then exactly 1 year later. Participants provided information on their periprocedural OAC management, the handling with dual therapy (OAC plus single antiplatelet therapy), the availability of specific antidotes, the transseptal puncture approach, and noteworthy complications. Results: Responses were received from all 35 centers and represent 10,010 AF ablation procedures annually. In 2018, the administration of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) was continued throughout the procedure at all centers (100%). In contrast, the majority of centers used minimally interrupted periprocedural non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) (54.3%), 13 centers (37.2%) completely interrupted NOAC, and only 3 centers (8.5%) continued NOAC throughout the procedure. At the 1-year follow-up survey, 32 centers were found to have continued their previous strategy of periprocedural OAC and 3 changed from a minimally interrupted to a continued NOAC strategy. Of note, 30 centers (85.7%) performed transseptal puncture fluoroscopically without additional cardiac imaging. In the setting of uninterrupted periprocedural OAC management, no relevant complications were noted. Conclusion: Our survey shows marked heterogeneous periprocedural OAC management at experienced EP centers in Germany. Whereas continuation of VKA has already been integrated into clinical practice, the majority of centers still use a minimally interrupted NOAC strategy.

Introduction Conflicting results regarding the impact of left common pulmonary vein (LCPV) on clinical outcome of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation with cryoballoon technology have been reported. Methods We systematically searched PubMed and Cochrane library for articles that compared the arrhythmia recurrence rate after cryoballoon ablation between patients with normal pattern PVs and patients with LCPV. Studies of first ablation for persistent and paroxysmal AF using the 28 mm Arctic Front Advance, Medtronic cryoballoon (CB-A) reporting clinical success rates at a mean follow-up of ≥12 months were included. Data were analyzed by applying a random effects model. Results A total of 5 studies with a total of 1178 patients met our predefined inclusion criteria. After a mean follow-up of 18.4 months, the overall success rate of CB-A ablation among patients with persistent and paroxysmal AF was 57%; in the LCPV group the success rate was 46% and in the normal anatomical pattern group it was 61%. No significant heterogeneity was noted among the studies (I2 = 35.8%; Q (df = 3) = 6.23 p-value = 0.18). Arrhythmia recurrence after CB-A ablation was not statistically significant between the two groups (LogOR 0.24; 95% CI [-0.16-0.63]; p-value = 0.23). No significant difference in PNI was observed between the two groups (p-value = 0.693). Conclusion The presence of LCPV does not affect the long-term outcome of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation ablation with 28 mm CB-A compared to normal left PVs pattern.

Highlights • Cardiac surgery in a patient with situs inversus totalis poses technical challenges. • CT 3D-reconstruction helps operative planning. • Minimally invasive approach is safe and effective for patients with SIT., Introduction Situs inversus totalis (SIT) is an uncommon congenital condition characterized by total transposition of abdominal and thoracic viscera. Performing minimally invasive cardiac surgery on individuals with SIT requires different surgical planning because of the unfamiliar positions of the heart and great vessels. Presentation of case A 52-year-old female was admitted to our center with palpitations and dyspnea on exertion. Chest X-ray showed dextrocardia. Echocardiography and chest computerized tomography (CT) revealed SIT with severe rheumatic mitral valve disease. Discussion Pre-operative three-dimensional (3D) chest CT reconstruction was helpful in surgical planning and management of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Mitral valve replacement and concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation using radiofrequency (RF) energy via left mini-thoracotomy was successfully performed on the patient. Conclusion Minimally invasive approach can be safely and effectively employed in patients with SIT.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic rhythm control strategies impact on AF-related symptoms, while leaving largely unaffected the risk of stroke. Moreover, up to 20% of AF patients are asymptomatic during paroxysmal relapses of arrhythmia, thus underlying the need for early markers to identify at-risk patients and prevent cerebrovascular accidents. Indeed, non-invasive assessment of pre-clinical substrate changes that predispose to AF could provide early identification of at-risk patients and allow for tailored care paths. ECG-derived P wave analysis is a simple-to-use and inexpensive tool that has been successfully employed to detect AF-associated structural and functional atrial changes. Beyond standard electrocardiographic techniques, high resolution signal averaged electrocardiography (SAECG), by recording microvolt amplitude atrial signals, allows more accurate analysis of the P wave and possibly AF risk stratification. This review focuses on the evidence that support P wave analysis to assess AF substrates, predict arrhythmia relapses and guide rhythm-control interventions.

IntroductionContinuous progress in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation techniques has led to an increasing number of procedures with improved outcome. However, about 30–50% of patients still experience recurrences within 1 year after their ablation. Comprehensive translational research approaches integrated in clinical care pathways may improve our understanding of the complex pathophysiology of AF and improve patient selection for AF ablation.ObjectivesWithin the “IntenSive mOlecular and eLectropathological chAracterization of patienTs undergoIng atrial fibrillatiOn ablatioN” (ISOLATION) study, we aim to identify predictors of successful AF ablation in the following domains: (1) clinical factors, (2) AF patterns, (3) anatomical characteristics, (4) electrophysiological characteristics, (5) circulating biomarkers, and (6) genetic background. Herein, the design of the ISOLATION study and the integration of all study procedures into a standardized pathway for patients undergoing AF ablation are described.MethodsISOLATION (NCT04342312) is a two-center prospective cohort study including 650 patients undergoing AF ablation. Clinical characteristics and routine clinical test results will be collected, as well as results from the following additional diagnostics: determination of body composition, pre-procedural rhythm monitoring, extended surface electrocardiogram, biomarker testing, genetic analysis, and questionnaires. A multimodality model including a combination of established predictors and novel techniques will be developed to predict ablation success.DiscussionIn this study, several domains will be examined to identify predictors of successful AF ablation. The results may be used to improve patient selection for invasive AF management and to tailor treatment decisions to individual patients.

Background: Pulmonary veins isolation (PVI) is a standard treatment for recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF). Uninterrupted anticoagulation for minimum 3 weeks before the ablation and exclusion of left atrial (LA) thrombus with transesophageal echography (TEE) immediately before or during the procedure minimize peri-procedural risk. We aimed to demonstrate the utility of cardiac tomography (CT) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) to rule out LA thrombus prior to PVI. Methods: Patients undergoing PVI for recurrent AF were retrospectively evaluated. Only patients that started anticoagulation at least 3 weeks prior to the CT/CMR and subsequently uninterrupted until the ablation procedure were selected. An intracardiac echo (ICE) catheter was used in all patients to evaluate LA thrombus. The results of CT/CMR were compared to ICE imaging. Results: We included 272 consecutive patients averaging 54.5 years (71% male; 30% persistent AF). Average CHA2DS2VASC Score was 0.9 and mean LA diameter was 43 mm, 111 patients on Acenocumarol and 161 on direct oral anticoagulants. Anticoagulation was started 227±392 days before the CT/CMR, and 291±416 days before the ablation procedure. CT/CMR diagnosed intracardiac thrombus in 2 cases, both in the LA appendage. A new CT/CMR revealed resolution of thrombus after 6 additional months of uninterrupted anticoagulation. No macroscopic thrombus was observed in any patients with ICE (negative predictive value of 100%; pConclusions: CT and MRI are excellent surrogates to TEE and ICE to rule out intracardiac thrombus in patients adequately anticoagulated prior AF ablation. This is true even for delayed procedures as long as anticoagulation is uninterrupted.

Atrioesophageal fistula is a life-threatening complication of ablation treatment for atrial fibrillation. Methods to reduce the risk of esophageal injury have evolved over the last decade, and diagnosis of this complication remains difficult and therefore challenging to treat in a timely manner. Delayed diagnosis leads to treatment occurring in the context of a critically ill patient, contributing to the poor prognosis associated with this complication. The associated mortality risk can be as high as 70%. Recent important advances in preventative techniques are explored in this review. Preventative techniques used in current clinical practice are discussed, which include high-power short-duration ablation, esophageal temperature probe monitoring, cryotherapy and laser balloon technologies, and use of proton pump inhibitors. A lack of randomized clinical evidence for the effectiveness of these practical methods are found. Alternative methods of esophageal protection has emerged in recent years, including mechanical deviation of the esophagus and esophageal temperature control (esophageal cooling). Although these are fairly recent methods, we discuss the available evidence to date. Mechanical deviation of the esophagus is due to undergo its first randomized study. Recent randomized study on esophageal cooling has shown promise of its effectiveness in preventing thermal injuries. Lastly, novel ablation technology that may be the future of esophageal protection, pulsed field ablation, is discussed. The findings of this review suggest that more robust clinical evidence for esophageal protection methods is warranted to improve the safety of atrial fibrillation ablation.

Problem: Mit einer Inzidenz von 1-2 % der Gesamtbevölkerung handelt es sich beim Vorhofflimmern um die häufigste Herzrhythmusstörung des Menschen. Als mögliche Behandlungsmethode dieser Arrhythmie gilt die Vorhofflimmer-Ablation im Rahmen der elektrophysiologischen Untersuchung (EPU). Das Know-How bezüglich des Ausmaßes dosisbeeinflussender Faktoren ist von hoher Priorität, um die Dosis des Patienten/der Patientin so gering wie möglich zu halten. Hierbei sollte ein Augenmerk auf die Auswirkungen eines Streustrahlenrasters auf die applizierte Patientendosis sowie die korrelierende Bildqualität bei Vorhofflimmer-Ablationen gelegt werden. Fragestellung: Welchen Einfluss nimmt der Streustrahlenraster auf die applizierte Patientendosis und auf die Bildqualität bei Vorhofflimmer-Ablationen? Methode: Als Grundlage dieser Arbeit dienten Fachbücher und Fachzeitschriften aus dem Bereich der Kardiologie, der elektrophysiologischen Untersuchung und der Strahlenphysik mit Fokus auf der Vorhofflimmer-Ablation und dem Streustrahlenraster. Zur Eingrenzung der Recherche wurde der Zeitraum auf die Jahre 2001 bis 2022 beschränkt und mittels der englischen Schlagwörter „Electrophysiological examination“, „Atrial fibrillation ablation“ und „Anti-scatter grid“ gesucht. Für die retrospektive Datenerhebung wurden anonymisierte Datensätze von Patienten/Patientinnen erhoben, die sich im Zeitraum vom 01.01.2019 bis 31.12.2020 einer Vorhofflimmer-Ablation unter Verwendung eines Streustrahlenrasters und vom 01.01.2021 bis 31.03.2022 einer Vorhofflimmer-Ablation ohne Streustrahlenraster unterzogen haben. Jene wurden in Hinblick auf die Prozedurdauer, die Durchleuchtungszeit, die Kerma, das Dosisflächenprodukt und die effektive Dosis miteinander verglichen. Zur Akquirierung der Daten bezüglich der Bildqualität wurden an den Univ. Klinik für Innere Medizin/Klinische Abteilung für Kardiologie Messungen anhand eines Phantoms ohne und mit Raster durchgeführt und die Aufnahmen hinsichtlich SNR und CNR analysiert. Ergebnisse: Die Analyse der retrospektiven Datenauswertung zeigte einen signifikanten Unterschied der Strahlenexposition zwischen den beiden Gruppen. Durch die Verwendung eines Streustrahlenraster wurde eine prozentuelle Zunahme der Kerma um 95,75 %, des Dosisflächenprodukts um 112,39 % und der effektive Dosis um 73,33 % verzeichnet. Zugleich wurde die Prozedurdauer um 22,56 % und die Durchleuchtungszeit um 33,56 % verlängert, wobei dies auf die höhere Anzahl der Personen mit hochgradigem LA zurückgeführt werden könnte. Die Resultate des SNR und des CNR ergaben mehrheitlich eine Verbesserung der Bildqualität durch den Einsatz des Streustrahlenrasters. Diskussion/Schlussfolgerung: Die Verwendung eines Streustrahlenrasters im Rahmen einer Vorhofflimmer-Ablation resultiert in einem erheblichen Anstieg der Dosiswerte mit gleichzeitiger Verbesserung der Bildqualität gegenüber der Interventionen ohne Streustrahlenraster. Die Daten der retrospektiven Studie zeigen jedoch keine Beeinträchtigung der Durchführung anhand der Prozedurdauer und der Durchleuchtungszeit. Angesichts dessen sollte aufgrund des ALARA-Prinzips unter Berücksichtigung des Gewichts kein Streustrahlenraster bei Vorhofflimmer-Ablationen verwendet werden. Problem: Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in humans, with an incidence of 1-2 % of the total population. Atrial fibrillation as part of the electrophysiological examination (EPU) is considered a possible treatment method for this arrhythmia. In this regard, know-how regarding the extent of dose-influencing factors is of high priority in order to keep the patient dose as low as possible. Attention should be paid to the impact of an anti-scatter grid on the applied patient dose as well as the correlating image quality in atrial fibrillation ablations. Research Question: What influence does the anti-scatter grid have on the applied patient dose and on the image quality in atrial fibrillation ablations? Method: This thesis is based on specialist books and journals from the fields of cardiology, electrophysiological examination and radiation physics with a focus on atrial fibrillation ablation and the anti-scatter grid. To narrow the search, the time period was limited to the years 2001 to 2022 and searched using the keywords “Electrophysiological examination", "Atrial fibrillation ablation" and “Anti-scatter grid”.For the retrospective data analysis, anonymised data sets were collected from patients who underwent atrial fibrillation ablation using an anti-scatter grid in the period from 01.01.2019 to 31.12.2020 and atrial fibrillation ablation without an anti-scatter grid from 01.01.2021 to 31.03.2022. These were compared in terms of procedure duration, fluoroscopy time, kerma, dose area product and effective dose. To acquire data on image quality, measurements were performed with and without a grid using a phantom, and the images were analysed with regard to SNR and CNR. Results: Analysis of the retrospective data analysis showed a significant difference in radiation exposure between the two groups. By using an anti-scatter grid, the kerma was increased by 95.75 %, the dose area product by 112.39 % and the effective dose by 73.33%. At the same time, the duration of the procedure was increased by 22.56 % and the fluoroscopy time by 33.56 %, although this could be attributed to the higher number of people with high-grade LA. The majority of the results of the SNR and the CNR showed that the image quality was improved by the use of an anti-scatter grid. Discussion/Conclusion: The use of an anti-scatter grid in atrial fibrillation ablation results in a significant increase in dose values with simultaneous improvement in image quality compared to interventions without an anti-scatter grid. However, the data of the retrospective study show no impairment of performance based on the duration of the procedure and fluoroscopy time. In this respect, due to the ALARA principle, an anti-scatter grid should not be used considering the weight. Tanja Zinkl Abweichender Titel laut Übersetzung der Verfasserin/des Verfassers Bachelorarbeit FH JOANNEUM 2022

Background: Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is used as an anticoagulant during the atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedure to prevent the occurrence of thromboembolic events. Guidelines recommend an activated clotting time (ACT) greater than 300 s (s) based on studies of patients treated with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for their AF. However, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have supplanted VKAs in AF and are now used as first-line therapy. It is recommended not to interrupt them during the procedure, which could interfere with the ACT measures. Objective: To assess the real-life relationship between ACT, DOAC concentrations, and UFH anti-Xa activity in patients treated by uninterrupted DOAC therapy. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study. We analyzed consecutive patients with AF who underwent catheter ablation under DOAC therapy. Results: In total, 40 patients were included, including 15 (37.5%), 20 (50.0%), and 5 (12.5%) on rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran, respectively. Baseline ACT was significantly lower in the apixaban group. ACT was linearly correlated with the residual concentration of apixaban and dabigatran but not with rivaroxaban. After UFH injection, ACT was linearly correlated with the anti-Xa activity, regardless of DOAC. Patients in the apixaban group received a higher total dose of UFH during the procedure to achieve a target ACT > 300 s, which resulted in significantly higher anti-Xa activity during the procedure. Conclusion: Our results raise the question of optimal management of intra-procedural heparin therapy and highlight the limitations of the ACT test, particularly in patients on apixaban.

Background: Durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is recommended for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment, but it has been demonstrated that it may not be enough to treat persistent AF (Pe-AF). Therefore, posterior wall isolation (PWI) is among the strategies adopted on top of PVI to treat Pe-AF patients. However, PWI using contiguous and optimized radiofrequency lesions remains challenging, and few studies have evaluated the impact of the Ablation Index (AI) on the efficacy of PWI. Moreover, previous papers did not evaluate arrhythmia recurrences using continuous monitoring. Methods: This is a prospective, observational, single-center study on patients affected by Pe-AF undergoing treated PVI plus AI-guided PWI. Procedures were performed using the CARTO mapping system, SmartTouch SF ablation catheter, and PentaRay multipolar mapping catheter. The AI settings were 500–550 for the anterior PV aspect and roofline, while the settings were 450–500 for the posterior PV aspect, bottom line, and/or PW lesions. All patients received an implantable loop recorder (ILR). All patients underwent clinical evaluation in the outpatient clinic at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. A standard 12-lead ECG was performed at each visit, and device data from the ILR were reviewed to assess for arrhythmia recurrence. Results: Between January 2021 and December 2021, forty-one consecutive patients underwent PVI plus PWI guided by AI at our center and were prospectively enrolled in the study. PVI was achieved in all patients, first-pass roofline block was obtained in 82.9% of the patients, and first-pass block of the bottom line was achieved in 36.5% of the patients. In 39% of the patients, PWI was not performed with a “box-only” lesion set, but with scattered lesions across the PW to achieve PWI. AI on the anterior aspect of the left PVs was 528 ± 22, while on the posterior aspect of the left PVs, it was 474 ± 18; on the anterior aspect of the right PVs, it was 532 ± 27, while on the posterior aspect of the right PVs, it was 477 ± 16; on the PW, AI was 468 ± 19. No acute complications occurred at the end of the procedure. After the blanking period, 70.7% of the patients reported no arrhythmia recurrence during the 12-month follow-up period. Conclusions: In patients with Pe-AF undergoing catheter ablation, PWI guided by AI seems to be an effective and feasible strategy in addition to standard PVI.

Purpose The development of an atrio-esophageal fistula, a rare yet potentially lethal complication of ablation for atrial fibrillation, could be related to direct tissue heat transfer during and immediately after the ablation. We therefore studied the postoperative esophageal findings by esophagogastroduodenoscopy in patients that underwent a hybrid ablation procedure using a novel preventive strategy to avoid thermal lesions. Methods Thirty-four patients (28 males, 65 years ± 9 years) were retrospectively included. All underwent a hybrid ablation in our center between April 2015 and November 2019 and agreed to an esophagogastroduodenoscopy within 0–14 days (mean: 5 days) following the ablation. To reduce the incidence of thermal lesions three procedural preventive strategies were introduced: (i) videoscopic intrathoracic transesophageal echocardiographic probe visualization to understand the relationship between posterior left atrial wall and esophagus, with probe retraction before ablation, (ii) lifting the cardiac tissue away from the esophagus during energy application, and (iii) a 30-s cool-off period after energy delivery with irrigation of the device, the ablated tissue, and the surrounding tissues. Results No esophageal thermal lesions were observed. One third of patients were diagnosed with incidental esophageal findings unrelated to the ablation procedure (11, 32.4%). Conclusion Novel preventive strategies by visualization and by avoiding contact between the ablation catheter or ablated tissue and the pericardium, seems to eliminate the potential risk of esophageal thermal lesions in the setting of hybrid ablation. Since one third of patients had preexisting esophageal disease, a more comprehensive pre-operative screening could be important to reduce the risk.

Atrioventricular regurgitation is frequent in the setting of heart failure. It is due to atrial and ventricular remodelling, as well as rhythmic disturbances and loss of synchrony. Once atrioventricular regurgitation develops, it can aggravate the underlying heart failure, and further participate and aggravate its own severity. Its presence is therefore concomitantly a surrogate of advance disease and a predictor of mortality. Heart failure management, including medical therapy, cardiac resynchronization therapy, and restoration of sinus rhythm, are the initial steps to reduce atrioventricular regurgitation. In the current review, we analyse the current data assessing the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and impact of non-valvular intervention on atrioventricular regurgitation including medical treatment, cardiac resynchronization and atrial fibrillation ablation.

Background Preprocedural clinical predictors of the successful maintenance of sinus rhythm may contribute to optimal treatment strategies for atrial fibrillation (AF). The CAAP‐AF score, a novel simple tool scored as 0‐13 points (including six independent variables) has been proposed to predict long‐term freedom from AF after catheter ablation. To clarify its reproducibility, we examined the CAAP‐AF score's predictive performance and then created subgroups to best predict AF recurrence by using a machine learning algorithm. Methods We studied 583 consecutive patients who underwent initial AF catheter ablation at our institute (median CAAP‐AF score, 5; age, 66 ± 10 years old; female, 28.3%; coronary artery disease, 10.8%; left atrial diameter, 39.9 ± 6.6 mm; number of antiarrhythmic drugs failed, 0.4 ± 0.6; nonparoxysmal AF, 45.3%). All were systematically followed up with an endpoint of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence after the last ablation procedure. Results During the 1.8 ± 1.2‐year follow‐up, 157 patients had atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence. Repeated procedures were performed (n = 115). Arrhythmia recurrence after the last session occurred in 69 patients. We created Kaplan‐Meier curves for freedom from AF after final AF ablation for ranges of CAAP‐AF scores; these confirmed the original study results. The machine learning using Classification and Regression Trees divided the patients into three categories by the risk score: low (score ≤5), intermediate (score 6‐8), and high (score ≥9). Conclusions The CAAP‐AF score was useful to stratify the atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence risk in AF patients undergoing catheter ablation into three categories. The score should be considered when deciding whether to perform AF ablation in clinical practice., We validated the CAAP‐AF score's effectiveness in an all‐comer setting to predict long‐term freedom from AF postcatheter ablation. We further created subgroups by using a machine learning method to best risk‐stratify the patients: low‐risk (the CAAP‐AF score ≤5), intermediate‐risk (score 6–8), and high‐risk (score ≥9).

AIM The aim of the study was to investigate the role of anatomical characteristics of the pulmonary veins (PVs) determining cooling kinetics during second-generation cryoballoon ablation (CbA). METHODS AND RESULTS we enrolled all consecutive patients who underwent CbA for symptomatic atrial fibrillation in our center from January 2019 to March 2019. All patients had complete computed tomography scans of the heart before the ablation. Anatomical characteristics were tested for prediction of a nadir temperature (NT) ≤ -48°C. Significant differences were noted among PV max diameter (20.8 ± 2.8 vs 18.5 ± 2.5 mm; P

No abstract available Keywords: Atrial fibrillation ablation; Interrupted inferior vena cava; Left atrial isomerism; Sinus node dysfunction; Transseptal access via internal jugular veins.

Background Cerebral arterial air embolism is a life-threatening complication that can result in neurologic deficits or death. Sometimes it is iatrogenic, presented as a complication of invasive medical procedures. Here we describe a case of cerebral arterial air embolism secondary to iatrogenic left atrial-esophageal fistula, of which the diagnosis might be covered up by the complicated pathophysiologic changes. Case presentation A 68-year-old man presented with unconsciousness hours after aphasia and right hemiplegia, accompanied with hematemesis and fever. He had a history of atrial fibrillation, treated by radiofrequency catheter ablation 1 month ago. Brain CT displayed massive air embolism in left hemisphere, as well as right parietal lobe. Chest CT demonstrated a focus of air in the left atrium, which highly suggested an atrial-esophageal fistula. The patient received high flow (6 L/min) oxygen therapy. Intravenous antibiotics including imipenem and vancomycin were administered together with crystalloid rehydration. Supportive therapies were given including intubation, mechanical ventilation and vasopressor use. Because of the patient’s unstable condition and poor prognosis, surgical repair was considered but not pursued. The patient presented a very fast deterioration of cardiac function and circulatory failure, and finally died from cardiac arrest. Conclusions Clinicians must have a high index of suspicion for atrial-esophageal fistula for patients presenting with chest discomfort, new onset of stroke, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and development of sepsis as long as 50 days after the ablation for atrial fibrillation. Urgent CT can ultimately establish the diagnosis in most cases.

Atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) is an uncommon but devastating complication of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Even with appropriate recognition and treatment, mortality is greater than 30% in most studies. If AEF is suspected, it is essential to avoid endoscopy and to order immediate cross-sectional imaging. If the diagnosis is confirmed, a thoracic surgeon should be promptly notified and must assess the patient urgently. The prognosis for AEF is poor even if it is appropriately recognized and addressed, so prevention must be a high priority. Prevention of AEF should involve the use of low-risk and cost-effective measures during ablation, which may increase safety, efficacy, or both. These strategies may include conscious sedation (as opposed to general anesthesia), low-power ablation, low-flow irrigation, short-duration lesions, esophageal temperature measurement, esophageal deviation, and pharmacologic prophylaxis with proton pump inhibitors or histamine H2 receptor blockers. Multiple new technologies are now becoming available, which may further reduce esophageal injury. Proceduralists should be aware of the available techniques and equipment that may help to reduce the risk of AEF, while simultaneously considering the possibility of unintended consequences.

An atrioesophageal fistula is an uncommon complication of atrial ablation with a mortality rate of 40–100%. Uniform treatment guidelines have yet to be established. Herein, we illustrate the successful surgical management of an atrioesophageal fistula, avoiding the need for an oesophageal surgical intervention by sealing and clipping of the oesophagus. This novel single-step hybrid approach combining cardiac surgical and gastroenterological techniques provides a less aggressive strategy with potentially a more favourable prognosis.

We studied the impact of advances in the development of AF devices on the incidence of complications. More specifically, the safety of the improved non-irrigated catheter (PVAC-Gold) was investigated. The first generation of this catheter showed a high incidence of asymptomatic cerebral embolism. Subsequently, the ablation device and protocol were revised to improve the safety of this device. Therefore, we investigated whether these revisions improved the incidence of cerebral infarcts by comparing it in a randomized fashion with an irrigated catheter. Secondly, the cryoballoon ablation catheter, was investigated to prevent complications by optimizing the ablation duration. The development of the second-generation cryoballoon brought a significant improvement in terms of efficacy. To prevent complications however, the ablation duration still needed to be optimized. We aimed to optimize the ablation duration by randomizing patients to different ablation durations using the incidence of dormant conduction as an indicator for incomplete isolation. Furthermore we tried to predict the absence of incomplete cryoballoon applications, making the standard waiting period after ablation unnecessary. Finaly, we focused on posterior left atrial box isolation in patients with progressive left atrium illness and investigated the effect of the ablation surface area on the outcome of the ablation.

Simple Summary Electrophysiological procedures are mainly performed using fluoroscopy, exposing both healthcare staff and patients to a non-negligible dose of radiation. To date, simple ablation procedures have often been approached with zero fluoroscopy. In complex ablation procedures, such as atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, zero fluoroscopy is still challenging mainly because of transseptal puncture. We report a workflow to perform a complete zero-fluoroscopy AF ablation using a 3D electro-anatomical mapping system, intracardiac echocardiography and a novel steerable guiding sheath visible on the mapping system. We describe two cases, one with paroxysmal AF and the other with persistent AF during which this novel workflow was successfully applied with complete zero-fluoroscopy exposure and achieving pulmonary vein isolation. Abstract Background and Rationale. A fluoroscopy-based approach to an electrophysiological procedure is widely validated and has been recognized as the gold standard for a long time. The use of fluoroscopy exposes both the healthcare staff and the patient to a non-negligible dose of radiation. To minimize the risks associated with the use of fluoroscopy, it would be reasonable to perform ablation procedures with zero fluoroscopy. This approach is widely used in simple ablation procedures, but not in complex procedures. In atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures, fluoroscopy remains the main technology used, in particular to guide the transseptal puncture. Main results and Implications. We present a workflow to perform a complete zero-fluoroscopy ablation for AF ablation procedures using a 3D electro-anatomical mapping system, intracardiac echocardiography and a novel steerable guiding sheath that can be visualized on the mapping system. We present two cases, one with paroxysmal AF and the other one with persistent AF during which we applied this novel workflow achieving a successful pulmonary vein isolation without complications and complete zero-fluoroscopy exposure.

Background Catheter ablation for complex left-atrial arrhythmia is increasing worldwide with many centres admitting patients overnight. Same-day procedures using conscious sedation carry significant benefits to patients/healthcare providers but data are limited. We evaluated the safety and cost-effectiveness of same-day complex left-atrial arrhythmia ablation. Method Multi-centre retrospective cohort study of all consecutive complex elective left-atrial ablation procedures performed between January 2011 and December 2019. Data were collected on planned same-day discharge versus overnight stay, baseline parameters, procedure details/success, ablation technology, post-operative complications, unplanned overnight admissions/outcomes at 4-months and mortality up to April 2020. A cost analysis of potential savings was also performed. Results A total of 967 consecutive patients underwent complex left-ablation using radiofrequency (point-by-point ablation aided by 3D-mapping or PVAC catheter ablation with fluoroscopic screening) or cryoballoon-ablation (mean age: 60.9 ± 11.6 years, range 23-83 yrs., 572 [59%] females). The majority of patients had isolation of pulmonary veins alone (n = 846, 87%) and most using conscious-sedation alone (n = 921, 95%). Of the total cohort, 414 (43%) had planned same-day procedure with 35 (8%) admitted overnight due to major (n = 5) or minor (n = 30) complications. Overall acute procedural success-rate was 96% (n = 932). Complications in planned overnight-stay/same-day cohorts were low. At 4-month follow-up there were 62 (6.4%) readmissions (femoral haematomas, palpitation, other reasons); there were 3 deaths at mean follow-up of 42.0 ± 27.6 months, none related to the procedure. Overnight stay costs £350; the same-day ablation policy over this period would have saved £310,450. Conclusions Same-day complex left-atrial catheter ablation using conscious sedation is safe and cost-effective with significant benefits for patients and healthcare providers. This is especially important in the current financial climate and Covid-19 pandemic., Highlights • We have previously reported same-day standard catheter ablation is safe, feasible and cost-effective. Data on same-day complex left-atrial ablation are limited. • Our multi-centre cohort study of 967 consecutive elective complex left-atrial ablation procedures between January 2011 and December 2019 revealed same-day ablations using conscious sedation were safe and associated with very few complications and could have significant benefits to patients and cost-savings for healthcare providers worldwide. • Same-day complex left-atrial ablation procedures can be performed safely without the need for overnight-stay. This has major implications for both patients and healthcare providers, especially given the current financial challenges and Covid-19 pandemic.

A 58-year-old woman with drug-refractory symptoms of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) was referred for AF ablation. A single site of ganglionated plexus triggering pulmonary vein ectopy and AF was ablated, without pulmonary vein isolation. This procedure led to long-term freedom from AF. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.), Graphical abstract

Introduction Targeting repeating‐pattern atrial fibrillation (AF) sources (reentry or focal drivers) can help in patient‐specific ablation therapy for AF; however, the development of reliable and accurate tools for locating such sources remains a major challenge. We describe iterative catheter navigation (ICAN) algorithm to locate AF drivers using a conventional circular Lasso catheter. Methods and Results At each step, the algorithm analyzes 10 bipolar electrograms recoded at a given catheter location and the history of previous catheter movements to determine if the source is inside the catheter loop. If not, it calculates new coordinates and selects a new position for the catheter. The process continues until a source is located. The algorithm was evaluated in a computer model of atrial tissue with various degrees of fibrosis under a broad range of arrhythmia scenarios. The latter included slow and fast reentry, macroreentry, figure‐of‐eight reentry, and fibrillatory conduction. Depending on the initial distance of the catheter from the source and scenario, it took about 3 to 16 steps to localize an AF source. In 94% of cases, the identified location was within 4 mm from the source, independently of the initial position of the catheter. The algorithm worked equally well in the presence of patchy fibrosis, low‐voltage areas, fragmented electrograms, and dominant‐frequency gradients. Conclusions AF repeating‐pattern sources can be localized using circular catheters without the need to map the entire tissue. The proposed algorithm has the potential to become a useful tool for patient‐specific ablation of AF sources located outside the pulmonary veins.

PubMed ID: 30170919 Second generation cryoballoon (CB) has been shown to be effective for treatment of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the fixed size of the non-compliant balloon may limit its use in patients with pulmonary vein (PV) abnormalities. In this study we investigated the acute success, procedural complications and long term outcome of CB based PV isolation (PVI) in patients with PV abnormality. A total of 238 patients [64.8 ± 11.1 years; 91 paroxysmal (38.2%), 147 persistent AF (61.8%)] underwent PVI using the second generation CB without preprocedural imaging. In 43/238 (18.1%) patients PV abnormality (left common PV in 26, right middle PV in 20) was observed. All targeted veins including abnormal PVs were isolated (100%). Transient phrenic nerve palsy (PNP) occurred in one (2.3%) patient in the PV anomalous group and 6 (3.0%) in the control group (p = NS). There was no other adverse event including PV stenosis, atrio-esophageal fistula or cerebrovascular events related to the procedure. During mean follow-up of 11.8 ± 5.4 month a total of 59 patients (24.7%) had atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) recurrence [27 (11.3%) had AT recurrence]. In the PV anomalous group, 20/43 (46.5%) patients had ATA recurrence compared to 39/195 (20%) in the control group (p < 0.001). AT recurrence was observed in 27 (11.3) patients [11 (25.5%) in the PV anomalous group and 16 (8.2%) in controls respectively, p = 0.003]. In patients with PV abnormality CB-based AF ablation results in a similar acute PVI rate but a higher ATA recurrence rate during follow up as compared to patients without PV abnormality. © 2018 Elsevier B.V. Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği, TKD K. Yalin received research and educational grant from Turkish Society of Cardiology . E. Lyan received travel grants and Speaker's Bureau Honoraria from Biosense Webster, Medtronic, Boston Scientific. R. Tilz received travel grants from St. Jude Medical, Topera, Biosense Webster, Daiichi Sankyo, Sentrheart and Speaker's Bureau Honoraria from Biosense Webster, Biotronik, P zer, Topera, Bristol-Myers Squibb; Bayer, Sano Aventis.

Complications of atrial fibrillation ablation include pericardial effusion, which tends to occur acutely. Large and hemodynamically important effusions are uncommon, but a small effusion may be present at the end of the procedure in up to 22% of ablations. We monitor for pericardial effusions routinely after ablation with intracardiac echocardiography. However, the follow-up of a small effusion present immediately after ablation remains uncertain, especially with the use of dabigatran or another novel oral anticoagulant. There are no current recommendations on the follow-up of small pericardial effusions after ablation. We present a case and ask a panel of experts for their opinions.