In this work, the Ictalurus punctatus species estimated available physical habitat is compared with the estimated physical habitat for the same but modified river reach, with the aim of creating a linear park, along a length of 5 500 m. To determine the effect of ecological park construction, on physical habitat of the Lerma river stretch of study, first, the available habitat for the Ictalurus punctatus species was estimated through the simulation of the physical habitat, by using surveying, hydraulics, and habitat information gotten at the river reach in its actual situation. Second, it was estimated the available habitat for the above species, upon the simulation of the physical habitat through the proposed modification for the ecological park creation. Third, it is presented a comparison between both scenarios in terms of available habitat estimated for Ictalurus punctatus species, concluding that in cases of adult and spawning life stages, changes in the channel to create an ecological park would produce a considerable loss of potentially usable habitat (PUH), while in the case of the juvenile life stage PUH remains virtually unchanged, and in the case of life stage fry the PUH would increase due to the presence of velocities and depths of lesser magnitude, due to the presence of minor flow rates and lower volume of the wet channel. It is expected that habitat modification for linear park construction may produce the lack of Ictalurus punktatus species conservation at the river reach of the study., {"references":["K. D. Bovee, B. L. Lamb, J. M. Bartholow, C.B. Stalnaker, J. Taylor &\nJ. Enriksen, Stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental\nmethodology. U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division\nInformation and Technology Report USGS/BRD-1998-0004. viii+131\npp, 1998.","K.D. Bovee, A guide to stream habitat analysis using the instream flow\nincremental methodology. Fort Collin, CO., U. S. Fish and Wildlife\nService. 251, 1992.","CONAGUA (Comision Nacional del Agua), Banco Nacional de Datos\nde Aguas Superficiales (BANDAS). México, D.F., 2010.","CONAGUA (Comisión Nacional del Agua), Cuencas hidrológicas con\nsu disponibilidad media anual de aguas superficiales publicada.\nhttp://www.conagua.gob.mx/Espaniol/TmpContenido.aspx?id=Documentos%20relacionados%20con:%20Instrumentos%20de%20Gesti%C3%\nB3n%20del%20Agua|Documentos%20relacionados%20con:%20Instrumentos%20de%20Gesti%C3%B3n%20del%20Agua|0|0|264|0|0. México. 2008, Web consulted october 25th 2009.","CONAGUA (Comisión Nacional del Agua), Ley de Aguas Nacionales y\nsu Reglamento. México. 2012, 209 p.","P. Correa, G., Atlas Geográfico del Estado de Michoacán. EDDISA,\nMorelia, México, 1978.","Florida Museum of Natural History, Taxonomic Information on Cat Fish\nhttp://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/catfish/. Consultada en junio de 2010.","E. E. Herricks, J. B. Stall, J.W. Eheart, A. B. Libby, S.F. Railback, &\nM.J. Sale, Instream flow needs analysis of the Little Wabash River\nBasin. Dept. Civil Eng., University of Illinois, Urbana, IL. . 1980, 150\npp.","Instituto de Ingeniería de la UNAM, Diagnostico Energético e\nHidráulico del Estado de Michoacán. Informe final de proyecto,\nMorelia, Michoacán. 2005, 211pp.\n[10] INE (Instituto Nacional de Ecología), Diagnóstico bio-físico y socioeconómico\nde la cuenca Lerma-Chapala. México. 2003, 285pp.\n[11] R.T. Milhous, Updike, & Schneider, D.M., Physical Habitat Simulation\nSystem Reference Manual - Version II. Instream Flow Information\nPaper No. 26. U.S. Fish and Wild. Serv. Biol. Rep. 89 (16). v.p. 1989.\n[12] R.T. Milhous, Wegner, D.L, y Waddle, T., Physical Habitat Simulation\nSystem User's Guide. Instream Flow Information Paper No. 11. U.S.\nFish and Wildlife Service. FWS/OBS-81/43. 1984.\n[13] W. S. Platts, , W. F. Megahan, & G. W. Minshall, Methods for\nevaluating stream riparian, and biotic conditions. USDA Forest Service,\nGeneral Tech. Report. INT-138. Ogden, UT. 1983, 70 pp.\n[14] R. A. Rueda Jasso, Pérez Munguía R., & Martínez Trujillo M., Informe\ndel análisis biológico de las poblaciones presentes y manejo ecológico\ndel meandro. Realizado dentro del Proyecto Fomix CONACYTGobierno\ndel Estado de Michoacán No, 73881. Morelia, Michoacán,\nMexico. 2010, 135pp.\n[15] C. Stalnaker, Lamb, B.L., Henriksen, J., Bovee K., And Bartholow, J.,\nThe Instream Flow Incremental Methodology, A primer for IFIM.\nBiological Report 29. U.S. Department of the Interior, National\nBiological Service. Washington, D.C., 1995, 44 pp.\n[16] R. E Tharme, A Global Perspective on Environmental Flow Assessment:\nEmerging Trends in the Development and Application of Environmental\nFlow Methodologies for Rivers. RIVER RESEARCH AND\nAPPLICATIONS 19: p. 397–441. 2003, Wiley InterScience.\n[17] L.C. Van Rijn, Principles of fluid flow and surface waves in rivers,\nstuaries, seas and oceans. Aqua publications, Amsterdam, The\nNetherlands, 1990.\n[18] T. J. Waddle, PHABSIM for Windows: user's manual and exercises.\nFort Collins, CO: U.S. Geological Survey. Open-File Report 01-340.\n2001, 288 p.\n[19] T. J. Waddle, Personal Communication, 2000.\n[20] E. García, Determinación de un Régimen de Caudales Ecológicos para\nel Cauce Natural (Meandro) del Río Lerma, que atraviesa la zona\nconurbada de La Piedad, Michoacán y Santa Ana Pacueco, Guanajuato.\nProyecto FOMIX CONACYT-Gobierno del Estado de Michoacán No.\n73881: Saneamiento del cauce natural (meandro) del Río Lerma e\nintegración del mismo a la dinámica urbana de La Piedad Michoacán.\nMorelia, México. 2011, 45 p."]}