Search

Conservation tillage is a viable management strategy to control soil wind erosion, but other strategies such as land application of biosolids that enhance soil quality may also reduce wind erosion. No studies have determined the effects of biosolids on wind erosion. Wind erosion potential of a silt loam was assessed using a portable wind tunnel after applying synthetic and biosolids fertilizer to traditional (disk) and conservation (undercutter) tillage practices during the summer fallow phase of a winter wheat-summer fallow (WW-SF) rotation in 2015 and 2016 in east-central Washington. Soil loss ranged from 12 to 61% lower for undercutter than disk tillage, possibly due to retention of more biomass on the soil surface of the undercutter versus disk tillage treatment. In contrast, soil loss was similar to or lower for biosolids as compared with synthetic fertilizer treatment. Our results suggest that biosolids applications to agricultural lands will have minimal impact on wind erosion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Biosolids are frequently applied to agricultural lands in dry regions, but wind erosion of these lands might transport biosolids particulates offsite and impact environmental quality. Our objective was to measure concentrations of EPA-regulated metals as well as macronutrients and micronutrients in soil and windblown sediment from a biosolids field experiment. A wind tunnel was used to generate windblown sediment from experimental plots subject to traditional (disk) or conservation (undercutter) tillage and application of biosolids or synthetic fertilizer on two measurement dates during the summer fallow phase of a winter wheat-summer fallow (WW-SF) rotation at Lind, WA in 2015 and 2016. Application of biosolids or use of undercutter tillage resulted in higher concentrations of heavy metals in the soil. For example, zinc (Zn) concentration in soil was 14% higher for undercutter than disk tillage and 21% higher for biosolids than synthetic fertilizer on the first measurement date in 2015. Differences in metal concentrations between treatments, however, were not as evident in windblown sediment. Similar results were found for nutrient concentrations in soil, but concentrations in windblown sediment were at least 10% lower for biosolids than synthetic fertilizer and undercutter than disk tillage on at least one measurement date. Little difference was found in loss of heavy metals and nutrients in windblown sediment between biosolids and synthetic fertilizer treatments. Our results suggest similar loss of metals and other elements from agriculture land after application of biosolids and synthetic fertilizer. Biosolids, however, are beneficial for increasing C and N content in soil. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Avian Diseases is the property of American Association of Avian Pathologists, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)