Search

IMPORTANCE: Patients with vitiligo often have impaired quality of life (QOL) and experience substantial psychosocial burden. OBJECTIVE: To explore the global association of vitiligo with QOL and mental health from the patient perspective. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This qualitative study of the cross-sectional population-based Vitiligo and Life Impact Among International Communities (VALIANT) study was conducted from May 6, 2021, to June 21, 2021. Potential participants for this qualitative study were recruited from an online panel in 17 countries. Of 5859 surveyed adults (aged ≥18 years) who reported a vitiligo diagnosis, 3919 (66.9%) completed the survey, and 3541 (60.4%) were included in the analysis. EXPOSURES: Patients were asked questions regarding their emotional well-being, including QOL and mental health. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Reported analyses are descriptive and hypothesis generating. Vitiligo Impact Patient scale (VIPs) scores ranged from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more psychosocial burden. RESULTS: The median age of the 3541 patients was 38 years (range, 18-95 years), and 1933 (54.6%) were male; 1602 patients (45.2%) had more than 5% affected body surface area (BSA; Self-Assessment Vitiligo Extent Score assessed), and 1445 patients (40.8%) had Fitzpatrick skin types IV to VI (ie, darker skin). The mean (SD) global short-form VIPs score was 27.3 (15.6) overall; patients from India (mean [SD], 40.2 [14.1]) reported the highest scores (ie, most burden). The QOL burden according to the scale was profound for patients with more than 5% affected BSA (mean [SD] score, 32.6 [14.2]), darker skin (mean [SD] score, 31.2 [15.6]), and lesions on the face (mean [SD] score, 30.0 [14.9]) or hands (mean [SD], 29.2 [15.2]). At least 40% of patients globally reported that vitiligo frequently affected aspects of their daily lives, including choosing clothes to wear (1956 of 3541 [55.2%]). Most patients (2103 of 3541 [59.4%]) reported concealing their vitiligo frequently. More than half of patients (2078 of 3541 [58.7%]) reported diagnosed mental health conditions, including anxiety (1019 of 3541 [28.8%]) and depression (866 of 3541 [24.5%]). The Patient Health Questionnaire–9 depression screener showed that 55.0% of patients (1948 of 3541) had moderate to severe depressive symptoms; the highest rates were in India (271 of 303 [89.4%]) and among patients with more than 5% affected BSA (1154 of 1602 [72.0%]) and darker skin (987 of 1445 [68.3%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This qualitative study found that, globally, patients with vitiligo reported being substantially affected in their emotional well-being, daily lives, and psychosocial health; the burden was typically greatest among patients with more than 5% affected BSA, darker skin types, and lesions on the face or hands. Survey findings suggest that patients reported having altered their behavior, expressed clear discontent, and have symptoms consistent with depression, which may be underdiagnosed.

Recent cross-sectional studies suggest that restless legs syndrome (RLS) may be associated with an increased prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) comorbidity or risk factors. We evaluated whether primary or secondary RLS was associated with an increased risk of incident cardiovascular disease in a retrospective cohort study within Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC).

Purpose: This study evaluated the effects of concomitant pravastatin and paroxetine use on the incidence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). Methods: A new-user retrospective cohort design was employed using data selected from US health insurance claims databases (OptumInsight and MarketScan) between July 1, 2002, and December 31, 2009. Patients included were of age ≥18; newly prescribed pravastatin or paroxetine; and enrolled in the database for ≥180 days prior to the index date (i.e., first prescription of incident drug). Patients were assigned to either incident pravastatin or incident paroxetine user groups. Patients were followed until the study endpoint (T2DM), discontinuation of incident drug, second drug, or end of study/patient data. Cox proportional hazards models compared T2DM in users of pravastatin who were also taking paroxetine at index the date (combination users) versus pravastatinonly users. A similar analysis among users of paroxetine evaluated the use or non-use of pravastatin at index date. Results: OptumInsight yielded 288,678 incident users of pravastatin or paroxetine; 443,137 were identified in MarketScan. The risk of T2DM among combination users compared to incident pravastatin only users was 1.05 (95% CI: 0.76, 1.44) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.97) in OptumInsight and MarketScan, respectively. The risk of T2DM among combination users compared to incident paroxetine only users was 1.03 (95% CI: 0.69, 1.54) in OptumInsight and 1.02 (95% CI: 0.97, 1.07) in MarketScan. Conclusion: The results indicate no increase in the risk of T2DM due to combined use of pravastatin and paroxetine compared to individual use of the two drugs; however, this study is limited by short mean follow-up.

Background: This cross-sectional survey describes attitudes and reading behaviors toward medication guides among 785 subjects with migraine, asthma, or COPD who reported recent use of Treximet (sumatriptan/naproxen sodium) or Advair (fluticasone propionate/salmeterol). Results: The survey demonstrated that the majority (82%) of subjects had read their medication guide, but most read it exactly once and did not read it thoroughly. Patients did not read medication guides with each refill, with the most frequent reasons being that they did not expect the information to have changed and that a doctor would tell them what they needed to know. Factors significantly associated with patients hypothetically being more likely to read medication guides associated with their new prescription included increasing age, simplification to format and content of the medication guide, and where subjects typically received their medication safety information. Patients reported acquiring medication safety from doctors or pharmacists more frequently than from medication guides. Conclusions: The results provide insights into potential revisions to the medication guides that may improve reading behaviors.

Background: This cross-sectional survey describes attitudes and reading behaviors toward medication guides among 785 subjects with migraine, asthma, or COPD who reported recent use of Treximet (sumatriptan/naproxen sodium) or Advair (fluticasone propionate/salmeterol).Results: The survey demonstrated that the majority (82%) of subjects had read their medication guide, but most read it exactly once and did not read it thoroughly. Patients did not read medication guides with each refill, with the most frequent reasons being that they did not expect the information to have changed and that a doctor would tell them what they needed to know. Factors significantly associated with patients hypothetically being more likely to read medication guides associated with their new prescription included increasing age, simplification to format and content of the medication guide, and where subjects typically received their medication safety information. Patients reported acquiring medication safety from doctors or pharmacists more frequently than from medication guides.Conclusions: The results provide insights into potential revisions to the medication guides that may improve reading behaviors.

Patients in the United States receive multiple forms of written drug information with their prescription medicines. This study solicited consumers’ preferences about formatting of information, their motivation to read drug information, and their ability to navigate and understand the information. A 3 × 3 study design was used in which 3 prototypes for 3 prescription drugs, ORTHO TRI-CYCLEN™ (norgestimate/ethinyl estradiol), COUMADIN™ (warfarin sodium), and PARNATE™ (tranylcypromine sulfate), were evaluated. The prototypes included 2 novel formats (“new” and “bubble”) and the “current” format that patients now commonly receive with their prescriptions. A total of 105 consumers participated in the study. Consumers correctly answered more questions about the medicine when presented with a new (70%-95%) or a bubble prototype (83%-92%) than with the current format (53%-74%). All attributes scored higher with both prototypes compared with the current format. However, in terms of overall preference, consumers favored the new prototype and indicated that they would be more motivated to read it. Consumers also reported that simple icons assisted them in finding important information. The new and bubble prototypes were favored by participants more than the current format. Key attributes preferred by consumers must be considered as new formats for patient medication information are developed.

Patients in the United States receive multiple forms of written drug information with their prescription medicines. This study solicited consumers’ preferences about formatting of information, their motivation to read drug information, and their ability to navigate and understand the information. A 3 × 3 study design was used in which 3 prototypes for 3 prescription drugs, ORTHO TRI-CYCLENTM(norgestimate/ethinyl estradiol), COUMADINTM(warfarin sodium), and PARNATETM(tranylcypromine sulfate), were evaluated. The prototypes included 2 novel formats (“new” and “bubble”) and the “current” format that patients now commonly receive with their prescriptions. A total of 105 consumers participated in the study. Consumers correctly answered more questions about the medicine when presented with a new (70%-95%) or a bubble prototype (83%-92%) than with the current format (53%-74%). All attributes scored higher with both prototypes compared with the current format. However, in terms of overall preference, consumers favored the new prototype and indicated that they would be more motivated to read it. Consumers also reported that simple icons assisted them in finding important information. The new and bubble prototypes were favored by participants more than the current format. Key attributes preferred by consumers must be considered as new formats for patient medication information are developed.