Search

There are few longitudinal studies of cognition in patients with multiple sclerosis, and the results of these studies remain inconclusive. No serial neuropsychological data of an exclusively primary progressive series are available. Cross-sectional analyses have revealed significant correlations between cognition and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS). This study investigated cognitive and MRI change in 99 PPMS patients from five European centres for 2 years. They were assessed at 12 month intervals using the Brief Repeatable Battery, a reasoning test, and a measure of depression. The MRI parameters of T1 hypointensity load, T2 lesion load, and partial brain volume were also calculated at each time point. There were no significant differences between the mean cognitive scores of the patients at year 0 and year 2. However, one-third of the patients demonstrated absolute cognitive decline on individual test scores. Results indicated that initial cognitive status on entry into the study was a good predictor of cognitive ability at 2 years. There was only a small number of significant correlations between changes in cognition and changes on MRI, notably T1 hypointensity load with the two attentional tasks (r = −0.266, P = 0.017; r = −0.303, P = 0.012). It is probable that multiple factors underlie this weak relation between the cognitive and MRI measures.

The relative rarity of primary progressive (PP) and transitional progressive (TP) multiple sclerosis has meant that little documentation of cognitive function in such patients is currently available. The aim of this study was to investigate the cognitive skills of patients with PP and TP multiple sclerosis relative to matched healthy controls, and to examine the relationship of this impairment to MRI parameters. Sixty-three patients (43 PP, 20 TP) were individually matched with healthy controls, who undertook the same cognitive tasks as the patient group. The neuropsychological assessment comprised Rao's brief repeatable battery, a reasoning test, and a measure of depression. Patients also underwent T1- and T2-weighted brain MRI. These patients were taken from a larger cohort (158 PP, 33 TP) in whom it had been demonstrated that the re were no significant differences between the mean scores of the PP and TP groups on any of the cognitive variables. The 63 patients were therefore taken as one group for comparison with the healthy controls. These patients performed significantly worse than the controls in tests of verbal memory, attention, verbal fluency and spatial reasoning. An impairment index was constructed and applied to the patient data. This correlated modestly with T2-lesion load (r = 0.45, P = 0.01), T1-hypointensity load (r = 0.45, P = 0.01) and cerebral volume (r = –0.35, P = 0.01). Thus, PP and TP multiple sclerosis patients demonstrate significant cognitive dysfunction when compared with matched healthy controls. The relationship between this impairment and MRI parameters is moderate, suggesting that cognitive dysfunction in PP and TP multiple sclerosis has a complex and multifactorial aetiology, which is not adequately explained by pathology as demonstrated on conventional MRI.