Search

ABSTRACTIntroductionMyelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal hematological disorder characterized by bone marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly, and inflammatory cytokine dysregulation. While the role of steroids in MF is not fully defined, their anti-inflammatory properties may offer therapeutic benefits, particularly in managing anemia and other cytopenias. Steroids exert their effects by suppressing pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL1, IL6, and TNF, and by enhancing anti-inflammatory cytokines like IL4 and IL10. Elevated levels of IL6 and other cytokines in MF are associated with anemia and poor prognosis, suggesting that steroid therapy could mitigate these effects.Areas coveredIn this manuscript, we review clinical studies which evaluated the safety and efficacy of steroids in MF patients. Moreover, we examine clinical data of the combination of steroids with immunomodulatory agents and JAK inhibitors. Our literature search consisted of an extensive review of PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov.Expert opinionThe role of steroids in the management of MF remains poorly defined, though emerging evidence suggests a potential therapeutic benefit, particularly in managing anemia and other cytopenias. The combination with IMIDs has also yielded positive outcomes as demonstrated in several studies. Steroids may also play a crucial role in managing cytopenias in MF patients receiving JAKi.

ABSTRACTIntroductionFollicular lymphoma (FL) is an indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma that shows a progressive increase in relapses and refractory in its natural history and a median survival of approximately 18–20 years. The advent of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies has changed the FL therapeutic algorithm, with an increase in progression-free survival. T-cell-dependent bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) represent an emerging drug class against FL.Areas coveredIn this review, we selected papers from the principal databases (PubMed, Medline, Medscape, ASCO, ESMO) between January 2021 and June 2024, using the keywords ‘mosunetuzumab’ and ‘follicular lymphoma’ to provide an overview of mosunetuzumab-axgb, a pioneering BsAb. Its mechanism of action, efficacy, safety, and future perspectives were analyzed.Expert opinionMosunetuzumab grants a directing T-cell mediated cytotoxicity and allows a step-up dosing that reduces adverse events, such as cytokine release syndrome, with promising tolerability. At the same time, it improves outcomes in the evolving landscape of FL management, even in post-CAR-T FL patients. Prognostic factors and targetable mechanisms of resistance need to be explored.

ABSTRACTIntroductionCXCR4/CXCL12 axis regulates cell proliferation, survival, and differentiation, as well as the homing and mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) from bone marrow niches to the peripheral blood. Furthermore, CXCR4 and CXCL12 are key mediators of cross-talk between hematological malignancies and their microenvironments. CXCR4 overexpression drives disease progression, boosts tumor cell survival, and promotes chemoresistance, leading to poor prognosis.Areas coveredIn light of these discoveries, scientific investigations, and clinical trials have underscored the therapeutic promise found in small-molecule antagonists like plerixafor, peptides/peptidomimetics, such as BKT140, monoclonal antibodies like PF-06747143 and ulocuplumab, as well as microRNAs. Their efficacy is evident in reducing tumor burden, inducing apoptosis and sensitizing malignant cells to conventional chemotherapies. This overview delves into the pathogenic role of the CXC4/CXCL12 axis in hematological neoplasms and examines the clinical application of key CXCR4 antagonists.Expert opinionThe information collectively emphasizes the potential of CXCR4 antagonists as a therapeutic strategy for hematologic malignancies, showcasing advancements in preclinical and clinical studies. As these therapeutic strategies progress through clinical trials, their potential to reshape the prognosis of hematologic malignancies will become increasingly apparent.

ABSTRACTIntroductionMyelofibrosis (MF) is a hematologic disease characterized by bone marrow fibrosis, cytopenias, splenomegaly, and constitutional symptoms. Recent years have seen the emergence of novel therapeutic agents, notably ruxolitinib and fedratinib, which target the Janus kinases (JAK) pathway. However, their myelosuppressive effect coupled with the persistence, and even worsening anemia remains a significant challenge, leading usually to treatment discontinuation.Areas coveredThis review focuses on Momelotinib (MMB), a unique JAK inhibitor that has shown promise in MF treatment, particularly in improving anemia. MMB inhibits type 1 kinase activin A receptor or activin receptor-like kinase-2 (ACVR1/ALK2), with consequent rebalancing of the SMAD pathways and reduced transcription of hepcidin. Moreover, it seems that MMB could reduce the serum levels of several inflammatory cytokines responsible for anemia. Clinical trials have demonstrated MMB’s efficacy in reducing spleen size, alleviating symptoms, and improving anemia, with a favorable safety profile compared to other JAK inhibitors, both in treatment-naïve and in pre-treated patients.Expert opinionDue to its mechanism of action, MMB represents a valuable therapeutic option in MF, addressing the clinical challenge of anemia and potentially improving outcomes for patients with hematologic malignancies. Ongoing research explores MMB’s potential in acute myeloid leukemia and combination therapies.

ABSTRACTIntroductionSelinexor, an XPO1 inhibitor, has emerged as a promising therapeutic option in the challenging landscape of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).Areas coveredThis article provides a review of selinexor, with a focus on available clinical studies involving MM patients and its safety profile. Clinical trials, such as STORM and BOSTON, have demonstrated its efficacy, particularly in combination regimens, showcasing notable overall response rates (ORR) and prolonged median progressionfree survival (mPFS). Selinexor’s versatility is evident across various combinations, including carfilzomibdexamethasone (XKd), lenalidomidedexamethasone (XRd), and pomalidomidedexamethasone (XPd), with efficacy observed even in tripleclass refractory and highrisk patient populations. However, challenges, including resistance mechanisms and adverse events, necessitate careful management. Realworld evidence also underscores selinexor’s effectiveness in RRMM, though dose adjustments and supportive measures remain crucial. Ongoing trials are exploring selinexor in diverse combinations and settings, including pomalidomidenaïve patients and postautologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) maintenance.Expert opinionThe evolving landscape of selinexor’s role in the sequencing of treatment for RRMM, its potential in highrisk patients, including those with extramedullary disease, as revealed in the most recent international meetings, and ongoing investigations signal a dynamic era in myeloma therapeutics. Selinexor emerges as a pivotal component in multidrug strategies and innovative combinations.

ABSTRACTIntroductionTraditional treatment strategies for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have primarily relied on standard chemotherapy regimens for four decades. Indeed, the landscape of AML therapy has evolved substantially in recent years, mainly due to the introduction of hypomethylating agents and small molecules.Bcl2 inhibitor venetoclax, Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitors such as midostaurin and gilteritinib, and isocitrate dehydrogenases 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2) inhibitors ivosidenib and enasidenib, as well as hedgehog (HH) pathway inhibitor glasdegib represented a significant step forward in AML therapeutic armamentarium. Smoothened (SMO) inhibitor in combination with low-dose cytarabine marks a recent milestone.Areas coveredIvosidenib, the first-in-class, selective, allosteric IDH1R132 inhibitor, showed the capability to induce in vitrodifferentiation of primary mIDH1 AML blasts. Clinical data highlighted its exceptional safety profile, as a standalone therapy and in combination strategy. Additionally, comprehensive studies consistently demonstrated its effectiveness, both in monotherapy and in association with chemotherapy.Expert opinionThe identified ivosidenib’s strengths, including its remarkable safety record and ability to yield positive therapeutic outcomes, position it as an ideal partner for both classic chemotherapy and biological treatments, i.e. hypometilant agents and/or venetoclax. Further studies are warranted to explore strategies for overcoming the occurrence of ivosidenib resistance.

ABSTRACTIntroductionOver the last few years, substantial progress has been made in the management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The first changes in the management of AML date back to last 2000s with the advent of hypometilant agents, later with Bcl2 inhibitor venetoclax, and Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitors (midostaurin and gilteritinib), and more recently with IDH1/2 inhibitors (ivosidenib and enasidenib) and the hedgehog (HH) pathway inhibitor glasdegib.Areas coveredGlasdegid, formerly PF-04449913 or PF-913, acts as a smoothened (SMO) inhibitor and has been recently approved in combination with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) by FDA and EMA for the treatment of naïve AML patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy.Several studies have explored the efficacy and safety of glasdegib, as a single agent or in combination with other drugs, in both the setting of relapsed/refractory and naïve AML patients, confirming its efficacy in controlling disease and safety profile.Expert opinionAll these trials suggest that glasdegib seems to be an ideal partner for both classic chemotherapy and biological treatments (such as therapy with FLT3 inhibitors). Further studies are needed to better understand which patients are more likely to respond to glasdegib.

The article reviews the architecture of the 50000 logements autour des axes de transports collectifs program of sustainable housing units of the Communauté Urbaine de Bordeax (CUB) of the city of Bordeaux, France.

The author reflects on the design and construction of the city of Brasilia, Brazil. Particular focus is given to the city's Plano Piloto (Pilot Plan) which was designed in 1956 by the Brazilian architect Lucio Costa. Additional topics discussed include the growth of satellite cities around Brasilia and observations on the city's public transportation system.

The author reflects on the design and construction of the city of Brasilia, Brazil. Particular focus is given to the city's Plano Piloto (Pilot Plan) which was designed in 1956 by the Brazilian architect Lucio Costa. Additional topics discussed include the growth of satellite cities around Brasilia and observations on the city's public transportation system.

A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-021-01242-9