Search

Introduction Guidelines recommend the use of direct oral anticoagulation therapy over warfarin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism and atrial fibrillation. However, there is uncertainty and a lack of data supporting the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation therapy in lung transplant recipients. Additionally, there are unique considerations for this population, such as labile renal function and drug interactions.Project Aims The objective of this program evaluation was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of apixaban therapy for atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism in lung transplant recipients.Design Medical records of all adult lung transplant recipients who received apixaban for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism treatment between January 1, 2018, and August 31, 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Safety was evaluated by the incidence of bleeding. Efficacy was evaluated by the recurrence of blood clots or the incidence of stroke.Results A total of 134 recipients were included in the review. Thromboembolisms occurred in 14 recipients (10%), and none experienced a stroke. Bleeding occurred in 12 recipients (9%).Conclusions The results of this evaluation were similar to those seen in smaller studies of the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulation therapy for the treatment of atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism in lung transplant recipients, especially in recipients taking interacting azole antifungals. Prospective, comparative studies are needed to confirm these findings.

The drug pirfenidone has been shown to slow the progression and decrease mortality of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Its exact mechanism is unknown, but it likely inhibits pro-fibrotic cytokine transforming growth factor beta, a known contributor to wound healing. We evaluated whether patients taking pirfenidone until lung transplantation had increased risk of impaired wound healing post-transplant. This information could determine whether pirfenidone should be discontinued prior to listing to allow for a wash-out period. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent lung transplantation for pulmonary fibrosis at Norton Thoracic Institute in Phoenix, Arizona, from January 2014 to December 2015. We describe 18 patients who took pirfenidone up to a month before transplant. Aside from one patient who experienced sternal dehiscence due to a surgical issue, all remaining patients did well with no evidence of airway dehiscence. Each of these 17 patients had been on pirfenidone for at least 30 days; nine patients had been on pirfenidone for over 90 days. Baseline characteristics including age, sex, body mass index, renal function, liver function, glucose level, pre-transplant corticosteroid use, and post-transplant immunosuppressant therapy were similar. In our experience, pirfenidone may be safely continued until lung transplantation. Only one patient in our series experienced impaired wound healing related to a surgical issue, even when pirfenidone was continued until lung transplantation. We found no evidence of impaired wound healing or airway complications after lung transplantation in patients who were treated with pirfenidone before lung transplantation.

Following a year of valganciclovir prophylaxis, a lung transplant recipient developed cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection that became resistant to ganciclovir, as confirmed by detection of UL97 kinase mutation M460V and a previously uncharacterized UL54 DNA polymerase mutation L516P. The latter mutation is now shown to confer ganciclovir and cidofovir resistance. As predicted from the viral genotype, foscarnet therapy was effective, but resumption of valganciclovir as secondary prophylaxis resulted in a plasma viral load rebound to 3.6 log10copies/mL several weeks later. Valganciclovir was then replaced by letermovir, resulting in gradual viral load reduction in the first 5 weeks to below the quantitation limit (2.7 log10copies/mL) for 1 week, followed by 10 weeks of rising viral loads reaching 4.3 log10copies/mL while on letermovir. At this point, CMV genotypic testing revealed UL56 mutation C325Y, which confers absolute resistance to letermovir. Retreatment with foscarnet was successful. This case adds to the considerable list of proven ganciclovir resistance mutations, and provides an early experience with letermovir resistance after off‐label therapeutic use. This experience is consistent with in vitro observations of rapid emergence of letermovir‐resistant CMV after drug exposure. A case of high‐grade letermovir resistance developing over a 15‐week treatment course suggests caution in the off‐ label use of this new antiviral drug for ganciclovir‐resistant cytomegalovirus infection.

Following a year of valganciclovir prophylaxis, a lung transplant recipient developed cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection that became resistant to ganciclovir, as confirmed by detection of UL97 kinase mutation M460V and a previously uncharacterized UL54 DNA polymerase mutation L516P. The latter mutation is now shown to confer ganciclovir and cidofovir resistance. As predicted from the viral genotype, foscarnet therapy was effective, but resumption of valganciclovir as secondary prophylaxis resulted in a plasma viral load rebound to 3.6 log10copies/mL several weeks later. Valganciclovir was then replaced by letermovir, resulting in gradual viral load reduction in the first 5 weeks to below the quantitation limit (2.7 log10copies/mL) for 1 week, followed by 10 weeks of rising viral loads reaching 4.3 log10copies/mL while on letermovir. At this point, CMV genotypic testing revealed UL56 mutation C325Y, which confers absolute resistance to letermovir. Retreatment with foscarnet was successful. This case adds to the considerable list of proven ganciclovir resistance mutations, and provides an early experience with letermovir resistance after off-label therapeutic use. This experience is consistent with in vitro observations of rapid emergence of letermovir-resistant CMV after drug exposure.