Search

This article contributes to debates about how Covid-19 became a dilemma of procedure inside the UK Parliament. Specifically, the article attempts to give an answer to the puzzle of why in-person proceedings and traditional approaches to representation were more important than adopting new and different ways to support representatives through, digital forms of participation. In order to answer this question, the article outlines and develops a theoretical argument, namely an interpretive approach to political science, and identifies a conceptual framework of beliefs, traditions and dilemmas. The article’s main focus is to develop this theory and apply it, in particular the concept of dilemma, in order to understand Covid-19 in Parliament. The article argues that the clash of beliefs that resulted from Covid-19 was ultimately won over through conservative webs of belief that relied on embedded and historical parliamentary practices and the power relations of MPs. This article therefore offers a conceptual contribution, specifically the importance of ideas and dilemmas to understanding politics, and an empirical contribution, by examining the case study of Covid-19 in the UK. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]