Search

• PE can be effectively adapted to an intensive outpatient format. • IOP-PE can result in clinically significant reductions in PTSD over time. • Addressing multiple traumatic events may increase processing and new learning. • Feedback and booster sessions may help to enhance and maintain treatment gains. • Incorporation of significant others may mitigate accommodating behaviors. Although prolonged exposure (PE) has been identified as a first-line treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), research has found that military service members and veterans have smaller reductions in symptom severity compared to civilians. The nature of trauma in a deployed combat setting and the unique complexities of military culture have been proposed as explanations for greater rates of PTSD and poorer treatment response to first-line psychotherapies in military and veteran populations. This paper presents a case study to highlight how a novel, intensive outpatient program utilizing prolonged exposure therapy (IOP-PE) may benefit military personnel with combat-related PTSD. The patient is a Caucasian man in his early 40s seeking treatment for PTSD after more than 10 years of enlisted, active duty military service across two branches and three combat deployments. The IOP-PE includes the standard PE components and eight, nonstandard treatment augmentations tailored for military personnel. In contrast to standard PE, which typically is delivered weekly over several months, IOP-PE consists of 15 daily, 90-minute PE sessions conducted over 3 weeks. The patient demonstrated large reductions on the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (28 points) and PTSD Checklist (48 points) by the 6-month posttreatment follow-up point. Findings provide support for conducting further research that determines whether IOP-PE is effective and tolerable in military and veteran populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this program evaluation was to investigate the effectiveness of a 10-day, group-based recovery-oriented intensive outpatient program (RIOP) offered at a VA Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Recovery Center in South Texas. The RIOP utilizes a multidisciplinary approach to treatment of veterans with acute mental health concerns, bridging cognitive-behavioral processes delivered in group format with other disciplinary approaches (e.g., recreation therapy, Chaplain services). The sample for this program evaluation consisted of 112 veterans who completed the RIOP during a twelve-month period. Ninety veterans (80.4%) had two or more recorded psychiatric diagnoses, and twenty-seven veterans had three or more recorded psychiatric diagnoses (24%). Eighty-five veterans were diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or adjustment disorder (75.9%); seventy-two with major depressive disorder (64.3%); fifty-three (47.3%) with a borderline personality disorder and/or documented clinically significant cluster A or B personality traits; twenty-eight with an anxiety disorder (25%); twenty-one with a bipolar disorder (18.8%); and seven with a psychotic disorder (6.3%). Results indicated a statistically significant decrease in symptoms of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress between pre- and post-treatment. Change in symptoms from baseline to post-treatment was not significantly correlated with age or number of psychiatric diagnoses. The results of the program evaluation suggest that a process-based cognitive-behavioral approach in combination with interventions from other recovery-oriented disciplines (delivered via group modality) can be an effective transdiagnostic treatment for veterans with complex trauma histories who meet criteria for more than one psychiatric diagnosis. • Evaluation of a transdiagnostic group intensive outpatient program for 112 veterans. • Decrease in depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress following treatment. • Treatment response not affected by age or number of psychiatric diagnoses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Objective Suicide is a leading cause of death in adolescents worldwide. There is an absence of effective and low cost treatment strategies for this growing public health problem. Current practice consists of brief hospitalization of acutely suicidal youth, but many get inadequate follow-up treatment. There are few alternatives to individual outpatient services offered at too low an intensity for an acutely distressed population. This paper describes the development, feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary clinical outcomes of an intensive outpatient program (IOP) for suicidal adolescents over a two-year period. Method 364 eligible adolescents (12–18 years) who had a worsening of suicidal ideation or a suicide attempt were enrolled in an IOP and attended at least 1 group session. Depressive symptoms and suicidality were assessed at baseline and discharge from the program and at one and six month follow-up. Results The majority of patients completed the IOP (81.0%; average of nine sessions). Over 95% of teens and parents responded that they were mostly or very satisfied with the IOP. The condition of patients improved at the time of discharge on depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation and behavior. 286 of the 364 youth (78.6%) completed the six-month follow-up. In total, 8.7% and 27.3% of the 286 respondents reported a suicide attempt and event, respectively, within six months of discharge from the IOP. Conclusions While limited by the lack of a control group, our findings suggest that an IOP for adolescents with suicidality is acceptable and feasible as either a step-down from or an alternative to inpatient treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This was an investigation of the feasibility and effectiveness of a brief yoga intervention (one session) within an intensive outpatient program (IOP) for service recipients diagnosed with various psychiatric disorders. Participants ( N  = 26) completed the Toronto Mindfulness Scale (TMS) and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Data was collected before and after one yoga session and follow-up data was collected via mail after discharge from the IOP. Scores indicated that negative affect significantly decreased and positive affect significantly increased from pre to post yoga session. Mindfulness scores significantly increased from pre to post yoga session. Though the results of this study supported that a yoga intervention is both feasible and effective within an IOP, collection of follow-up data after discharge via mail was not as feasible. The results of this preliminary investigation support a larger and longitudinal study to further examine yoga as a treatment modality with this clinical population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]