Search

As health care continues to evolve toward information transparency, an increasing number of patients have access to their medical records, including result reports that were not originally designed to be patient-facing. Previous studies have demonstrated that patients have poor understanding of medical terminology. However, patient comprehension of terminology specific to breast pathology reports has not been well studied. We assessed patient understanding of common medical terms found in breast pathology reports. A survey was administered electronically to patients scheduled for a screening mammogram within a multisite health care system. Participants were asked to objectively define and interpret 8 medical terms common to breast biopsy pathology reports. Patient perception of the utility of various educational tools was also assessed. Demographic information including health literacy, education level, previous cancer diagnosis, and primary language was collected. In total, 527 patients completed the survey. Terms including "malignant" and "benign" were the most correctly defined at 80% and 73%, respectively, whereas only 1% correctly defined "high grade." Factors including race/ethnicity and education level were correlated with more correct scores. Patients preferred educational tools that were specific to their diagnosis and available at the time they were reviewing their results. Patient comprehension of common medical terminology is poor. Potential assumptions of understanding based on patient factors including education, past medical history, and occupation are misinformed. With the newly mandated immediate release of information to patients, there is a pressing need to develop and integrate educational tools to support patients through all aspects of their care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Many breast cancer patients and survivors experience clinically significant distress, which poses a danger to both their psychologic and clinical well-being. Improved understanding of the types of distress that patients experience at the time of breast cancer diagnosis may reveal areas for intervention to improve quality of life and long-term outcomes. We retrospectively evaluated newly diagnosed breast cancer patients who completed a cancer distress screening tool at their initial multidisciplinary clinic visit. The screening tool, which has not yet been validated, asked patients to rate their distress and identify specific concerns related to emotional, social, health, and practical distress. To evaluate predictors of distress, patient characteristics were collected through review of the electronic medical record. The study population consisted of 379 patients. The number of patients experiencing high distress varied by domain: emotional (66.5%), social (25.1%), health (57.8%), and practical (36.4%). With the exception of marital status, no demographic, clinical, or pathologic factors were found to be significantly associated with distress in any domain. Breast cancer patients experience significant distress at the time of initial diagnosis. Additional investigation assessing modifiable contributors to distress and developing clinical interventions to decrease distress from the time of diagnosis throughout treatment is needed to improve quality of life in this patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: No systemic therapy is effective against pancreatic cancer (PC). Pancreatic cancer stem cells (PCSC) are hypothesized to account for therapeutic resistance. Several PCSC subpopulations were reported, each characterized by different markers. To be able to target PCSC, we sought to better define this putative heterogeneity. Therefore, we tested most of the known putative PCSC markers in established and fresh tumor cell lines. CD20, CD24, CD44, CD133, CD184 (CXCR4), CD326 (EpCam, ESA), Sox-2, OCT 3/4, and the side-population (SP) were tested in five PC cell lines, and the effects of confluency, hypoxia, radiation, and gemcitabine on the SP. The testing phase suggested several putative PCSC populations that were further tested and validated for their tumor-initiating capacity against known PCSC in 3 established and 1 fresh PC cell lines. Cell surface and intracellular markers showed significant variability among cell lines. SP was the only common marker in all cell lines and consistently less than 1%. SP response to confluence, hypoxia, radiation, and gemcitabine was inconsistent between cell lines. The initial testing phase suggested that SP/CD44-CD24-CD326+ cells might be a novel PCSC subpopulation. Tumor initiation capacity tests in nude mice confirmed their increased tumorigenicity over previously reported PCSC. Our data better define the heterogeneity of reported PCSC in cell lines tested in this study. We propose that prior to targeting PC via PCSC, one will need to gain more insight into this heterogeneity. Finally, we show that SP/CD44-CD24-CD326+ cells are a novel subpopulation of pancreatic cancer tumor initiating cells. Further mechanistic studies may lead to better targeting of PC via targeting this novel PCSC. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Purpose: Children requiring prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) after traumatic injury have been shown to have poor survival. However, outcome of children still receiving CPR on-arrival by emergency medical service to the emergency department (ED) has not been demonstrated in a published clinical series. Methods: An 11-year retrospective analysis from a level I pediatric trauma center of the outcomes of children requiring prehospital CPR after traumatic injury was undertaken. Outcome variables were stratified by survival, death, and CPR on-arrival. Results: Of 169 children requiring prehospital CPR, there were 28 survivors and 141 deaths. Of 69 children requiring CPR on-arrival to the ED, there were no survivors. There were 70 females and 99 males. Mean age of survivors was 3.4 years; nonsurvivors, 8.8 years; and 4.6 years for CPR on-arrival. Thirty-nine percent of all injuries were sustained in motor vehicle collisions; 20%, motor pedestrian collisions; 19%, assaults; 7%, falls; 4%, all terrain vehicle/motorcycle/bicycle; and 4%, gunshot wounds. Forty-two percent of all patients expired in the ED, whereas 34% expired in the intensive care unit. Eighty-seven percent of CPR on-arrival patients expired in the ED. Fifty-five percent of survivors had full neurologic recovery. Conclusion: Although mortality was extremely high for children requiring CPR in the field After traumatic injury, it was absolute for those arriving at the ED still undergoing CPR. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]