Search

Since 2004, the Department of Veterans' Affairs (DVA) has funded the Veterans' Medicines Advice and Therapeutics Education Services (MATES) program. The main intervention of the program is quarterly targeted patient‐specific prescriber feedback. The feedback comprises a list of relevant medications dispensed to each patient and notes about potential medication‐related problems specific to the intervention. Supportive educational material is provided to assist general practitioners (GPs) resolve these medication‐related problems. Veterans identified in the GP mailing are sent an educational brochure highlighting medication issues and encouraging them to speak with their doctor. To enable pharmacists to support this practice change, educational material is also provided to all pharmacies and accredited pharmacists. The most recent of the 28 interventions implemented to date have addressed osteoporosis, opioid‐induced constipation and urinary incontinence. Overall, program materials have been mailed to 249 454 veterans, 34 527 GPs and around 8000 pharmacies and accredited pharmacists. Evaluation has demonstrated a doubling of home medicines review (HMR) rates in the veteran population. Analyses of the DVA data have reported a 45% reduction in hospitalisation for heart failure following HMR among veterans with heart failure (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4–0.8), and a 79% reduction in hospitalisation for haemorrhage (HR 0.2; 95%CI 0.05–0.9) 2 to 6 months after an HMR in veterans dispensed warfarin. Veterans' MATES has resulted in clinically significant improvements in medication and health service use.

ObjectiveThe aim was to determine the frequency with which people have multiple brand changes for more than one medicine and to identify factors associated with having multiple brand substitutions.

In Australia, brand substitution by pharmacists has been possible since 1994. There is no limit to the number of substitutions per prescription. Doctors have expressed concern that patients may receive a different product each time their prescription repeats are dispensed, which has the potential to confuse patients. It is unknown how often multiple substitutions per prescription occur.

Background:In Australia, brand substitution by pharmacists has been possible since 1994. There is no limit to the number of substitutions per prescription. Doctors have expressed concern that patients may receive a different product each time their prescription repeats are dispensed, which has the potential to confuse patients. It is unknown how often multiple substitutions per prescription occur. Objectives:We aimed to identify the number of switches per prescription for a range of medicines and to determine the number of different brand and generic products supplied on each prescription. Methods:Repatriation Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme prescription claims between 1 January 2001 and 28 February 2006 were identified for atenolol, citalopram, enalapril, metformin, omeprazole, ramipril, and simvastatin. Original prescriptions with five repeats and all supplies dispensed were included. Switches were identified if a different product was supplied on consecutive repeat dispensings. Results:533,279 original prescriptions were included. 488,735 (92%) had no switches on repeats and 37,513 (7%) had only one switch. Only 1% of all prescriptions had more than one switch identified on repeats, and in most cases only two different products were supplied. None of the prescriptions had a different product supplied on each dispensing. Conclusion and Implications:Multiple switches per prescription are uncommon and multiple different products are rarely supplied on repeats of the same prescription. The rules of the brand substitution policy appear to be adequate in allowing brand choice for patients, without leading to multiple switches per prescription.

Although pharmacists have been criticised for not following brand substitution guidelines, evidence is lacking. Brand substitution of simvastatin has been possible since November 2004 when the first generic became available; prior to this 2 non‐substitutable products were available. To identify the rate of switching between brand and generic products of simvastatin. Analyses were conducted using Repatriation Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme prescription claims data from 1 November 2002 to 28 February 2006. Switches were identified if different brand or generic products were dispensed consecutively. The change in the rate of switching post‐generics was compared to the pre‐generics baseline. Following introduction of generics the switching rate increased to 78.2 switches per 1000 dispensings. Switching was 22 times more likely post‐generics compared to pre‐generics (rate ratio 21.91 (20.01, 24.00), p < 0.001). The rate of switching did not change when 10 products were available for substitution compared to when there were only 4 (RR 1.02 (0.998, 1.041); p = 0.0664). Post‐generics, 64% of switches occurred when different prescriptions were dispensed consecutively. Switching between simvastatin products was low prior to generic availability, even though 2 products were available. The switching rate increased when bioequivalent products were available, suggesting that pharmacists practice in accordance with brand substitution legislation. Consumers were most vulnerable to switching when different prescriptions were dispensed consecutively. Pharmacists should be aware of this and take steps to ensure that switches do not occur unnecessarily.