1. Comparison of survival and complications between minimally invasive and open staging surgeries in non-endometrioid endometrial cancer.
- Author
-
Hwang, Dong Won, Kim, Se Ik, Kim, Hee Seung, Chung, Hyun Hoon, Kim, Jae-Weon, Park, Noh Hyun, and Lee, Maria
- Subjects
MINIMALLY invasive procedures ,OVERALL survival ,PROGRESSION-free survival ,BLOOD loss estimation ,SURVIVAL rate ,ENDOMETRIAL surgery - Abstract
This study aimed to compare survival and complications between minimally invasive surgery and open surgery and evaluate related risk factors in patients with non-endometrioid endometrial cancer. Clinicopathologic characteristics; survival outcomes; complications; and prognostic factors associated with progression-free survival and overall survival were compared among patients with non-endometrioid endometrial cancer who underwent primary staging surgery using laparoscopic, robotic, or open abdominal surgery (2004–2017). In total, 91 patients were included: 41 and 50 underwent minimally invasive surgery and open surgery, respectively. The minimally invasive surgery and open surgery groups showed similar progression-free survival (5-year progression-free survival rate, 58.7 % vs. 58.5 %; P =.925) and overall survival (5-year overall survival rate, 73.6 % vs. 80.3 %; P =.834). Intraoperative (7.2 % vs. 6.0 %; P =.111) and postoperative surgical complications (14.6 % vs. 26.0 %; P =.165) were similar between the groups. However, blood loss was lower (mean, 305.1 vs. 561.2 ml, P <.001) and hospital stay was shorter (mean, 8.2 vs. 15.4 days, P <.001) in the minimally invasive surgery group. Using multivariate analysis, lymphovascular space invasion was identified as poor prognostic factor for progression-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 3.054; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.521–6.132; P =.002) and overall survival (adjusted HR, 3.918; 95 % CI, 1.455–10.551; P =.007), whereas age ≥ 60 years was poor prognostic factor for only overall survival (adjusted HR, 5.0953; 95 % CI, 1.660–15.378; P =.004). Surgical outcomes did not differ between the minimally invasive and open surgery group in patients with non-endometrioid endometrial cancer. Lymphovascular space invasion was a significant survival factor in this context. • Compared outcomes between MIS and open-staging surgery for nonendometrioid endometrial cancer. • Estimated blood loss and length of hospital stay were lower in the MIS group. • Intraoperative transfusions were higher in the open surgery group. • MIS for nonendometrioid EC has no difference in survivals compared to open surgery. • MIS reduces the risk of complications and enhances cost-effectiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF