Search

When global navigation satellite system (GNSS) signals reflect off of the surfaces of lakes, rivers, wetlands, and other inland water bodies, the surfaces are often sufficiently smooth to produce coherent reflections. The observable produced from coherent reflections made by GNSS reflectometry (GNSS-R) instruments exhibits particular features with respect to diffusely scattered signals by rough land and wind-driven oceans allowing detection of such smooth bodies. Several different GNSS-R coherence detection approaches have been reported in the literature and developed among the GNSS-R community over the last several years; however, the merits of each approach are difficult to compare because they are often applied to different scenarios and quantified in different ways, independently of each other. This article provides a unified comparison of a wide variety of different GNSS-R coherence detection approaches, which is the most extensively published to date. The approaches are applied to a common dataset from the NASA Cyclone Global Navigation Satellite System (CYGNSS) satellites that includes both the standard Level-1 delay–Doppler map (DDM) science product and raw baseband signal recordings. In addition, simulated observables are generated with varying coherent and noncoherent reflection components to exercise algorithms over a wide range of signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and relative powers. Objective measures of accuracy are used to quantify the performance of each approach in the context of relative implementation complexity. Conclusions are presented on the pros/cons of the various methods as they relate to various applications such as real-time in-orbit coherence detection or postprocessing on the ground.

Recent results have highlighted the potential ability of bistatic and multistatic synthetic aperture radar (SAR) tomographers to measure vegetation structure and surface topography. However, the quality of SAR tomographic measurements with multiple platforms is impacted by the phase instability in each platform’s oscillator. The phase noise, if uncompensated, may lead to degradation in the SAR data products such as increased sidelobe levels, reduced peak amplitude of the impulse response, and low-frequency phase modulation, among others. In this work, we model and examine the effects of oscillator phase noise on tomographic SAR signals for spaceborne missions flying in formation. A synchronization process is also adopted to help mitigate oscillator phase errors by measuring and predicting relative phase offsets at prescribed temporal intervals. A simulation tool was developed to examine the point target response (PTR) as seen by realistic satellite constellations in low Earth orbit using different quality oscillators, radar configurations, and synchronization configurations. A first analysis of a multiplatform tomographic SAR mission suggests that a system without a dedicated physical link with minimal effects on the PTR may be achievable using current oscillators. Our analysis also shows that phase noise has differing effects on multistatic radar modes. Tomograms formed with a system operating in single-input–multiple-output (SIMO) mode are the most affected by an oscillator phase noise error, followed by multiple-input–multiple-output (MIMO), with negligible effects on the single-input single-output (SAR-SISO) mode. These trade studies and the simulation tool can be used to help inform the design of future multistatic radar missions.