Search

Pre-sarcopenia, defined by the loss of muscle mass, is significantly associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications in digestive surgery, particularly pancreatic resection. The five predominant markers of sarcopenia are: psoas muscle area (TPA), intramuscular adipose tissue content (IMAC), Average Hounsfield Unit Calculation (HUAC), Skeletal Muscle Mass Index (MMI), and the ratio between visceral adipose tissue area and muscle surface area (VFA/TAMA). No standard reference marker has been determined. This retrospective cohort included patients who underwent pancreatic resection at the University Hospital of Angers between January 2008 and June 2017. The goal was to determine the marker that was most significantly associated with morbidity and mortality in pancreatic surgery. The secondary objective was to determine the characteristics of pre-sarcopenic patients. The TPA score is the most sensitive marker for identifying patients at highest risk for immediate complications (P = 0.008), proving far more sensitive than MMI (P = 0.02), HUAC (P = 0.34), IMAC (P = 1), or VFA/TAMA (P = 0.42). Postoperative mortality was 3.3% (n = 5), morbidity was 63.8% (n = 97). Pre-sarcopenic patients, as identified by the TPA index had significantly more immediate complications (71.2% versus 49.5%, P = 0.008), in particular, more gastroparesis (P = 0.02) and pancreatic fistula (P = 0.03). In patients requiring pancreatic surgery, the prevalence of pre-sarcopenia is high and seems to be associated with a greater risk of immediate postoperative complications. The TPA score seems to be the most sensitive marker for detecting pre-sarcopenia. Evaluation of TPA preoperatively would make it possible to identify priority patients a priori who might benefit from pre-habilitation programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary Introduction While enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been proven to improve results in colorectal operations with regard to morbidity and duration of hospital stay, its impact on recovery of bowel motility is poorly documented. The aims of this study were to assess the impact of ERAS on bowel motility recovery, and to assess the consequences of the definition of postoperative ileus on its reported incidence in the literature. Material and methods This is a single-center prospective observational study of consecutive patients who underwent colorectal resection with anastomosis over a period of 17 months. Global resumption of intestinal transit (GROT) was defined as passage of stool combined with alimentary tolerance of solid food. Results One hundred and thirty-one patients were included. A median of 14 items (range: 13–16) was complied out of 19 observable items in the protocol. Median time to passage of flatus (MTPF) was 2 days and the GROT was 3 days. The time interval to MTPF as well as to GROT decreased as adherence to the ERAS protocol increased (respectively P < 0.001, r 2 = 0.11 and P = 0.04, r 2 = 0.06). The incidence of postoperative “ileus” varied from 1.5% to 61.8% depending on the interval chosen to define ileus (cut-off from 1 to 7 days). Adherence to ≥ 85% of the items in the ERAS protocol protected patients from “prolonged ileus”, i.e., lasting ≥ 4 days (OR = 0.35; 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.83). Conclusion The implementation of and compliance with an ERAS protocol allowed a reduction in the time to GROT. There is a need for a consensual definition of postoperative ileus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary Background The literature concerning stricture secondary to diverticulitis is poor. Stricture in this setting should be an indication for surgery because (a) of the potential risk of cancer and (b) morbidity is not increased compared to other indications for colectomy. The goal of this report is to study the post-surgical morbidity and the quality of life in patients after sigmoidectomy for sigmoid stricture associated with diverticular disease. Method This is a monocenter retrospective observational study including patients with a preoperative diagnosis of sigmoid stricture associated with diverticular disease undergoing operation between Jan 1, 2007 and Dec 31, 2013. The GastroIntestinal Quality of Life Index was used to assess patient satisfaction. Results Sixteen patients were included of which nine were female. Median age was 69.5 (46–84) and the median body mass index was 23.55 kg/m 2 (17.2–28.4). Elective sigmoidectomy was performed in all 16 patients. Overall, complications occurred in five patients (31.2%) (4 minor complications and 1 major complication according to the Dindo and Clavien Classification); none resulted in death. Pathology identified two adenocarcinomas (12.5%). The mean GastroIntestinal Quality of Life Index was 122 (67–144) and 10/11 patients were satisfied with their surgical intervention. Conclusion Sigmoid stricture prevents endoscopic exploration of the entire colon and thus it may prove difficult to rule out a malignancy. Surgery does not impair the quality of life since morbidity is similar to other indications for sigmoidectomy. For these reasons, we recommend that stricture associated with diverticular disease should be an indication for sigmoidectomy including lymph node clearance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary The gold standard in treatment of acute cholecystitis is cholecystectomy associated with antibiotics. In certain circumstances, percutaneous cholecystostomy is an interventional alternative. Percutaneous cholecystostomy is usually performed under local anesthesia by the radiologist using ultrasonographic or CT guidance. A drain can be inserted either through a trans-hepatic or a trans-peritoneal approach. Complications occur in nearly 10% of cases including hemorrhage, hemobilia, pneumothorax or bile leaks, depending on whether the approach was trans-hepatic or trans-peritoneal. The main indications for percutaneous cholecystostomy are resistance to medical treatment or severely-ill patients in intensive care. Drains should be maintained 3 to 6 weeks before removal. In patients with good general condition (ASA score I–II), secondary cholecystectomy can be recommended to avoid recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Aims of the study: To evaluate post-operative complications and the recurrence rate after repair of large ventral incisional hernia with an open technique using intraperitoneal composite mesh and an associated aponeurotic overlay. Patients and methods: This prospective study included a total of 280 patients who underwent repair of large incisional hernia using Parietex® composite mesh. Results: The post-operative mortality rate was 0.35%. Six patients (2%) developed subcutaneous surgical site infection without infection of the prosthesis. Six other patients (2%) developed a deep-seated infection; in three cases, the mesh had to be removed. Nine patients (3.2%) developed recurrent incisional hernia. Conclusion: Large ventral incisional hernias can be effectively treated by the intraperitoneal placement of Parietex® composite mesh overlaid by an aponeurotic graft; the incidence of complications in this prospective study was very low. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors of surgical site infections (SSI) in clean surgery and to identify high- and low-risk patients from whom efficacy of the antibiotic prophylaxis was analyzed. METHODS: From June 1982 to September 1996, a database was established from 3 prospective multicenter randomized studies, containing information of 5798 patients who underwent abdominal noncolorectal surgery. Multivariate analysis was performed using nonconditional logistic regression expressed as an odds ratio (OR). RESULTS: A total of 2374 patients underwent a clean surgery. An antibiotic prophylaxis was administered to 1943 patients (81.8%). A multivariate analysis was performed including only preoperative factors and disclosed 3 independent factors: cirrhosis (OR, 2.8; 95% CI: 1.6-12.8), other disease (OR, 2.7; 95% CI: 1.3-5.8), and preoperative urinary catheter (OR, 2.1; 95% CI: 1.1-4.6). A risk score for SSI was constructed: -4.9 + (1.5 x cirrhosis++) + (other disease++) + (0.8 x preoperative urinary catheter++) (++ = 0 if absent or 1 if present). The study included 1 group of patients having no risk factors for SSI with a score below -4.5 (S1R-) and 1 group of patients having 1 or more risk factors for SSI with a score over -4.5 (S1R+). Antibiotic prophylaxis did not reduce the infectious complication rate in the S1R- group, whereas, in the S1R+ group, it reduced significantly the rate of SSI and of parietal infectious complications by 58% and 69%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic prophylaxis in clean abdominal surgery was effective in high-risk patients. Urinary catheter must be avoided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Introduction: The mild pancreatic tumors are more and more treated by central pancreatectomy (CP) in alternative with the widened pancreatectomies. Indeed, their morbidity is lesser but they are however burdened by a rate of important postoperative fistulas. The purpose of our study is to compare pancreatico-jejunal anastomosis and pancreatico-gastric anastomosis. Methods: This work was realized in a bicentric retrospective way. Twenty-five CP were included and classified according to two groups according to the pancreatic anastomosis (group 1 for pancreatico-jejunal anastomosis and group 2 for the pancreatico-gastric anastomosis). CP was realized according to a protocol standardized in both centers and the complications were classified according to the classification of Clavien and Dindo and the fistulas according to the classification of Bassi. Results: Both groups were comparable. The duration operating and the blood losses were equivalent in both groups. There was a significant difference (P =0,014) as regards the rate of fistula. The pancreatico-gastric anastomosis complicated more often of a low-grade fistula. However, in both groups, the treatment was mainly medical. Our results were comparable with those found in the literature and confirmed the advantages of the CP with regard to the cephalic duodeno-pancreatectomy (DPC) or to the distal pancreatectomy (DP). However, in the literature, a meta-analysis did not report difference between both types of anastomosis but this one concerned only the DPC. Conclusions: This work showed a less important incidence of low-grade fistula after pancreatico-jejunal anastomosis in the fall of a PM. This result should be confirmed by a later study on a more important sample of PM. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Summary: Cholecystectomy is one of the most common abdominal surgical procedures. No formal agreement has been reached about the routine practice of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC). The purpose of this survey was to describe the practices and the opinions of surgeons in western France. A survey was conducted among 300 visceral surgeons practicing in western France who were asked to respond to a questionnaire with objective and subjective items. One hundred forty-eight answers were interpretable. Among these 148 surgeons, 125 (83.4%) performed IOC routinely (IOCr group) and 23 (15.4%) selectively (IOCs group). Mean age of responding surgeons was 49.3 years. Groups IOCr and IOCs were not significantly different concerning surgical experience. Surgeons in both groups responded that IOC effectively screens for intraoperative bile duct injury. In our survey, routine practice of IOC was more common than reported by our English-speaking colleagues. The routine users responded that IOC can screen for intraoperative bile duct injury or choledocholithiasis. The selective users responded that IOC has its own morbidity. IOC is commonly performed in France during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Although it may not be indispensable, it allows rapid screening for intraoperative bile duct injury. It also provides documented proof of good surgical practice in the event of a litigation claim after bile duct injury. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]