Search

Although it can be difficult to define who should be considered an elderly person, the population aged 65 and over is experiencing the fastest demographic expansion and will represent almost one billion inhabitants of the 2030 World. Drug use increases dramatically with age and the elderly population is, by far, the highest consumer of medicines, up to 10 times more than younger adults. This consumption is in many aspects inappropriate, unjustified or sub-optimal and associated with a huge number of adverse reactions, admissions in emergency units and attributable deaths. A good part of which could be prevented if basic rules of good prescription and ad-hocguidelines were systematically used. Even if older adults are more likely to present an adverse drug reaction, available data tend to support that the main risk factor of iatrogenesis in the elderly is the number of drugs used. Moreover, it is often irrelevant to transpose to this population the conclusions concerning the benefit-risk balance of drugs assessed in younger adults; similarly, approaches and programs classically used in pharmacovigilance and pharmacoepidemiology should be tailored to this specific population.

The French National Health Data System (SNDS) comprises healthcare data that cover 99% of the population (over 67 million individuals) in France. The aim of this study was to present an overview of published pharmacoepidemiological studies using the SNDS in its maturation phase.

To provide a tool for drug misuse or potential misuse monitoring by using a healthcare insurance database.

Some concerns have emerged about the evidence of benefits on survival outcomes or quality of life of new anticancer drugs. In parallel, the decreased cancer mortality leads to an increased number of patients exposed to cancer treatment-related consequences. In this context, pharmacoepidemiology is crucial to assess anticancer drug use, effectiveness and safety in real life conditions. We aimed to describe strengths, limitations and considerations associated with the use of the French national health insurance database (système national des données de santé[SNDS]) to conduct pharmacoepidemiological studies in oncology. The SNDS represents a powerful tool in pharmacoepidemiology owing to its extensive coverage, accurate description and quantification of drug exposure and individual data on patients. The main limitations of this database ensue from the administrative nature resulting in technical difficulties in its management and gaps in availability of data. Another limitation is the lack of accurate identification of diseases, comorbidities or outcomes and potential confounding with notably the lack of data regarding cancer stage, prognosis or risk factors. Finally, the accurate identification of the nature of chemotherapy received by patients is sometimes complex. To minimize these limitations, several approaches and statistical methods could be used as highlighted by national or international initiatives. First, the SNDS may be linked with cancer registry or clinical data. Then, several data sources could be combined using meta-analytical methods. The development of methodological tools and the use of standardized methods are crucial to enhance the quality of studies that can impact clinical practice and guide public decision. Pharmacoepidemiological approaches and pharmacovigilance represent an important cornerstone in oncology for signal detection or long-term follow up of cancer patients. In this context, validated methods to identify cancer patients and to describe chemotherapy regimens within these data should be promoted and remain too scarce despite international guidelines. Moreover, limits and strength of each data sources should be systematically discussed according to the research question. Optimized and framed use of claims database represents a future challenge in onco-pharmacoepidemiology.

Quantifier et caractériser l’utilisation d’Internet pour la recherche d’informations sur le médicament.

Since the early 2000s, the arrival of the so-called targeted therapies and immunotherapies have prolonged survival rates in many cancers. In parallel, post-marketing surveillance of anticancer drugs through pharmacoepidemiology has gradually developed. This paper provides (i) a detailed argumentation of the foundations for pharmacoepidemiology of anticancer drugs, (ii) an overview of pharmacoepidemiological studies currently available in this field, and (iii) some perspectives to improve pharmacoepidemiology for oncology practice. First of all, according to the existing literature, the development of pharmacoepidemiological studies for the clinical evaluation of anticancer drugs appears particularly justified based on common limitations of clinical trials in oncology regarding essential methodological principles such as adequate control groups, randomisation or double blinding. Many descriptive field cohort studies have investigated together treatment patterns, effectiveness, and safety to compare results from clinical trials with those of everyday practice. The utilisation of anticancer drugs has also been extensively described through cross-sectional or cohort studies by often using medico-administrative or medical databases. Such studies are useful to quantify and characterise use over time in the population, including clinically unvalidated use, and to evaluate adherence and persistence to increasingly available oral anticancer drugs. Despite their importance to increase knowledge, comparative effectiveness or safety studies remain uncommon. In a context of rapidly emerging therapies and personalised treatments, this may be due to methodological challenges especially related to the choice of a comparator or the consideration of confounding by indication. In the future, efforts must be pursued to provide real-time access to high-quality, large-scale clinical, biological and treatment data, and to improve record-linkage between hospital and outpatient databases. More research is also needed to better evaluate all medications, not only anticancer, as part of an overall cancer care pathway and to bring the evaluation of anticancer drugs closer to patients and society (social pharmacology).

Historiquement, les études pharmaco-épidémiologiques en rapport avec l’oncologie concernaient le risque de cancer associé à l’exposition à certains médicaments. Depuis une dizaine d’années, la commercialisation des thérapies ciblées (TC) offre des opportunités de recherche centrées sur les médicaments anticancéreux. Nous proposons de décrire l’expérience de la plate-forme de recherche en pharmaco-épidémiologie de Bordeaux dans l’évaluation de l’utilisation et de l’efficacité des médicaments anticancéreux en situation réelle de soins.