Search

ABSTRACTAberrant methylation is one of the most frequent epigenetic alterations that can contribute to tumor formation. Cell-free DNA can originate from tumor tissue; therefore, the evaluation of methylation markers in cell-free DNA can be a promising method for cancer screening. Our aim was to develop a panel of biomarkers with altered methylation along the colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence in both colonic tissue and plasma. Methylation of selected CpG sites in healthy colonic (n = 15), adenoma (n = 15), and colorectal cancer (n = 15) tissues was analyzed by pyrosequencing. MethyLight PCR was applied to study the DNA methylation of SFRP1, SFRP2, SDC2,and PRIMA1gene promoters in 121 plasma and 32 biopsy samples. The effect of altered promoter methylation on protein expression was examined by immunohistochemistry. Significantly higher (P< 0.05) DNA methylation levels were detected in the promoter regions of all 4 markers, both in CRC and adenoma tissues compared with healthy controls. Methylation of SFRP1, SFRP2, SDC2,and PRIMA1promoter sequences was observed in 85.1%, 72.3%, 89.4%, and 80.9% of plasma samples from patients with CRC and 89.2%, 83.8%, 81.1% and 70.3% from adenoma patients, respectively. When applied as a panel, CRC patients could be distinguished from controls with 91.5% sensitivity and 97.3% specificity [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.978], while adenoma samples could be differentiated with 89.2% sensitivity and 86.5% specificity (AUC = 0.937). Immunohistochemical analysis indicated decreasing protein levels of all 4 markers along the colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Our findings suggest that this methylation biomarker panel allows non-invasive detection of colorectal adenoma and cancer from plasma samples.

ABSTRACTThe WNT signaling pathway has an essential role in colorectal carcinogenesis and progression, which involves a cascade of genetic and epigenetic changes. We aimed to analyze DNA methylation affecting the WNT pathway genes in colorectal carcinogenesis in promoter and gene body regions using whole methylome analysis in 9 colorectal cancer, 15 adenoma, and 6 normal tumor adjacent tissue (NAT) samples by methyl capture sequencing. Functional methylation was confirmed on 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine-treated colorectal cancer cell line datasets. In parallel with the DNA methylation analysis, mutations of WNT pathway genes (APC, β-catenin/CTNNB1) were analyzed by 454 sequencing on GS Junior platform. Most differentially methylated CpG sites were localized in gene body regions (95% of WNT pathway genes). In the promoter regions, 33 of the 160 analyzed WNT pathway genes were differentially methylated in colorectal cancer vs. normal, including hypermethylated AXIN2, CHP1, PRICKLE1, SFRP1, SFRP2, SOX17, and hypomethylated CACYBP, CTNNB1, MYC; 44 genes in adenoma vs. NAT; and 41 genes in colorectal cancer vs. adenoma comparisons. Hypermethylation of AXIN2, DKK1, VANGL1, and WNT5Agene promoters was higher, while those of SOX17, PRICKLE1, DAAM2, and MYCwas lower in colon carcinoma compared to adenoma. Inverse correlation between expression and methylation was confirmed in 23 genes, including APC, CHP1, PRICKLE1, PSEN1, and SFRP1. Differential methylation affected both canonical and noncanonical WNT pathway genes in colorectal normal-adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Aberrant DNA methylation appears already in adenomas as an early event of colorectal carcinogenesis.

Automated DNA isolation can decrease hands-on time in routine pathology. Our aim was to apply automated DNA isolation and perform DNA methylation analyses. DNA isolation was performed manually from fresh frozen (CRC = 10, normal = 10) specimens and colonic biopsies (CRC = 10, healthy = 10) with QIAamp DNA Mini Kit and from FFPE blocks (CRC = 10, normal = 10) with QIAamp DNA FFPET Kit. Automated DNA isolation was performed with MagNA Pure DNA and Viral NA SV kit on MagNA Pure 96 system. DNA methylation of MAL, SFRP1, and SFRP2 were analyzed with methylation-specific high-resolution melting analysis. Yield of automatically isolated samples was equal in fresh frozens and significantly lower compared to manually isolated biopsy and FFPE samples. OD260/280 of fresh frozen and biopsy samples were similar after both isolations, automated isolation resulted in lower purity in FFPE samples. Both protocols resulted in similar OD260/230 from fresh frozens, automated isolation method was superior in biopsies and manual protocol in FFPE samples. DNA methylation of biopsies, fresh frozen samples were highly similar after both methods, results of automatically and manually isolated FFPE samples were different. Automated DNA isolation from fresh frozen samples can be suitable for high-throughput laboratories.

About 10% of epithelioid sarcomas have biallelic mutation of the SMARCB1(SWI/SNF-related, matrix-associated, actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily b, member 1) gene resulting in a lack of this nuclear protein. It has been suggested that SMARCB1may be silenced by epigenetic changes in the remaining 90% of tumors. Thus, we hypothesized that the promoter of SMARCB1is hypermethylated. We also examined SMARCB1mRNA level to determine if a post-translational change was possible. Thirty-six cases of epithelioid sarcomas were studied. Immunohistochemistry and mutation analysis of the SMARCB1gene were performed to select appropriate cases. Methylation status was assessed by methylation-specific PCR. Laser capture microdissection of tumor cells followed by real-time PCR was applied to examine the expression of SMARCB1mRNA. Of 36 epithelioid sarcomas, 31 (86%) displayed a lack of SMARCB1 nuclear protein. In all, 4 (13%) of 31 SMARCB1-negative cases harbored biallelic deletion while 9 (33%) cases showed single-allelic deletion. One (4%) frameshift deletion of exon 3 and one point mutation of exon 7 were also found. In 16 (59%) cases, both alleles were intact. Altogether, 25/31 (81%) SMARCB1-negative cases had at least one intact allele. None of these cases demonstrated promoter hypermethylation. Low levels of SMARCB1mRNA were found in all cases with tumor tissue extracted RNA (because of the minimal normal cell contamination) but no mRNA could be detected in laser dissected cases (containing only tumor cells). Enhancer of zeste homolog 2(EZH2) overexpression was not characteristic of epithelioid sarcoma. Thus, loss of SMARCB1 expression in epithelioid sarcoma is caused neither by DNA hypermethylation nor by post-translational modifications. Most likely it is the microRNA destruction of SMARCB1mRNA but further investigations are needed to elucidate this issue.

About 10% of epithelioid sarcomas have biallelic mutation of the SMARCB1 (SWI/SNF-related, matrix-associated, actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily b, member 1) gene resulting in a lack of this nuclear protein. It has been suggested that SMARCB1 may be silenced by epigenetic changes in the remaining 90% of tumors. Thus, we hypothesized that the promoter of SMARCB1 is hypermethylated. We also examined SMARCB1 mRNA level to determine if a post-translational change was possible. Thirty-six cases of epithelioid sarcomas were studied. Immunohistochemistry and mutation analysis of the SMARCB1 gene were performed to select appropriate cases. Methylation status was assessed by methylation-specific PCR. Laser capture microdissection of tumor cells followed by real-time PCR was applied to examine the expression of SMARCB1 mRNA. Of 36 epithelioid sarcomas, 31 (86%) displayed a lack of SMARCB1 nuclear protein. In all, 4 (13%) of 31 SMARCB1-negative cases harbored biallelic deletion while 9 (33%) cases showed single-allelic deletion. One (4%) frameshift deletion of exon 3 and one point mutation of exon 7 were also found. In 16 (59%) cases, both alleles were intact. Altogether, 25/31 (81%) SMARCB1-negative cases had at least one intact allele. None of these cases demonstrated promoter hypermethylation. Low levels of SMARCB1 mRNA were found in all cases with tumor tissue extracted RNA (because of the minimal normal cell contamination) but no mRNA could be detected in laser dissected cases (containing only tumor cells). Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) overexpression was not characteristic of epithelioid sarcoma. Thus, loss of SMARCB1 expression in epithelioid sarcoma is caused neither by DNA hypermethylation nor by post-translational modifications. Most likely it is the microRNA destruction of SMARCB1 mRNA but further investigations are needed to elucidate this issue.