Search

Major salivary gland malignancies are rare, constituting 1%-3% of head-neck tumours. The surgical management of the clinically negative neck (cN0) does not have a univocal consensus yet. We have carried out a retrospective study on 119 cases of malignant parotid tumours that were surgically treated between January 1999 and January 2014. Our aim was to analyse preoperative findings (cytotype, cTNM) and to correlate these with postoperative results (grading, histotype, occult neck metastasis) in patients with parotid tumours to obtain an appropriate indication for neck management. In cN0 patients with a T1, T2 low-grade cancer a wait-and-see approach is preferred. Instead, in cNO patients with high-grade or low-grade T3, T4 tumours an elective neck dissection (END) is always planned. Levels II, III and IV, at least, must be dissected. The decision to dissect level V or I depends on the location of the primary tumour. In the cN0 group 19 of 58 (32.7%) patients who underwent an END had occult metastases. In clinically positive neck (cN+) patients a Modified Radical Neck Dissection (MRND), at least, must be performed. The criteria to add adjuvant radiotherapy (PORT) include deep lobe parotid tumours, advanced lesions (T3-T4), microscopic (R2) or macroscopic (R1) residual disease after surgery, high grade tumours, perineural diffusion, lymph node metastasis, capsular rupture, and local recurrence after previous surgery. Kaplan-Meier analyses have shown a reduction in the overall survival (OS) from 100% to 91% and in disease-free survival (DFS) from 100% to 95.5% for the NO-PORT and PORT group, respectively. In our study, the cN0 pN+ patients had a higher degree of DFS compared to the cN+. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to compare Merocel (Merocel Hemox 10 cm) and BNP (biodegradable nasopore) during a septoturbinoplasty procedure in terms of efficiency and patient comfort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective review of 72 patients who had undergone septoturbinoplasty between January 2015 and January 2016. Each group, packed with BNP or Merocel Hemox 10 cm was composed of 36 patients. A standard visual analogue scale ranging from zero (no symptoms) to 10 (the most severe symptoms) was used to assess subjective symptoms. To compare the usefulness of materials we evaluated the postoperative bleeding, infection and adhesion after the removal of packing with and endoscopic examination using a 5-point scale (zero, absent; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; and 4, very severe). Secretions and crusts were evaluated 1 week and 4 weeks after surgery in both groups using a 5-point scale (zero, absent; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; and 4, very severe). RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were enrolled in the study, 45 women and 27 men; age range 15-78 with a mean age of 47 years. In the group A (Merocel group), 21 cases showed grade 1 bleeding (58%), 11 cases grade 2 (30%) and 4 patients grade 0 (11.1%). In the group B (BNP group), 29 cases showed grade 0 bleeding (80.56%) and 7 cases showed grade 1 bleeding (19.44%). There was a statistical significant difference between the Merocel group and the BNP group in terms of bleeding after removal of packing material (p < 0.05). In the group A, 16 patients developed mild adhesion (44%), 8 patients moderate adhesion (22.2%), 3 patients severe adhesion (8.33%) and 1 patient very severe adhesion (2.77%). BNP nasal packing didn't cause any adhesion in 25 patients (69.4%), 11 patients developed mild adhesion (30.5%). So there was a statistical significant difference between group A and group B regarding the adhesion (p < 0.05). There was a statistically significance reduction of nasal secretions and crusts at a week after surgery in the BNP group vs. Merocel group. The difference is not statistically significant 4 weeks after surgery. About the severity of symptoms related to nasal packing, we found a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between Merocel and BNP group regarding the pain during packing removal, the general satisfaction and the pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Biodegradable nasopore reduced pain and patient discomfort during packing removal and causes less bleeding compared to Merocel hemox 10 cm. This type of material can be used after septoturbinolplasty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article presents a case of an 80 year-old woman with severe hematoma and consequently a compartmental syndrome of the hand complicated with acute bullous eruption due to extravasation of contrast material. Compartment syndrome of the hand has been linked to a number of various etiologies. Failure to adequately diagnose and treat compartment syndromes of the hand can lead to irreparable functional loss. In the majority of the cases extravasation results only in minimal swelling or erythema. However, severe skin necrosis, ulceration and compartment syndrome may occur with extravasation of large volumes. Compartment syndrome was diagnosed, and the patient underwent immediately fasciotomy. After fasciotomy we weekly followed up our patient with medications and after she regained the full use of the hand. We report this case to assess the importance of a careful evaluation of the intravenous administration site and close monitoring of the patient during contrast material injection to obtain minimal or prevent every kind of extravasation injuries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]