Search

Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are effective drugs for eradicating hepatitis C virus (HCV). However, concerns about the risk of cancer after HCV eradication remain. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the incidence of cancer between patients treated with anti-HCV therapies in Catalonia (Spain) and properly matched, non-HCV-infected individuals (controls).

Recent data suggest that anti-TNF doses can be reduced in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients. Some authors even propose withdrawing treatment in patients in clinical remission; however, at present there is no evidence to support this. To assess how long AS patients with persistent clinical remission remained free of flares after anti-TNF withdrawal and to evaluate the effects of treatment reintroduction. We also analyze the characteristics of patients who did not present clinical relapse. Multicenter, prospective, observational study of a cohort of patients with active AS who had received infliximab as a first anti-TNF treatment and who presented persistent remission (more than 6 months). We recorded at baseline and every 6–8 weeks over the 12-month period the age, gender, disease duration, peripheral arthritis or enthesitis, HLA-B27 status, BASDAI, CRP, ESR, BASFI, and three visual analogue scales, spine global pain, spinal night time pain, and patient’s global assessment. Thirty-six out of 107 patients (34%) presented persistent remission and were included in our study. After treatment withdrawal, 21 of these 36 patients (58%) presented clinical relapse during follow-up. Infliximab therapy was reintroduced and only 52% achieved clinical remission, as they had before the discontinuation of infliximab; in an additional 10%, reintroduction of infliximab was ineffective, obliging us to change the anti-TNF therapy. No clinical or biological factors were associated with the occurrence of relapse during the follow-up. Two thirds of patients in clinical remission presented clinical relapse shortly after infliximab withdrawal. Although the reintroduction of infliximab treatment was safe, half of the patients did not present the same clinical response that they had achieved prior to treatment withdrawal.

The objective was to determine if dose reduction is non-inferior to full-dose TNFi to maintain low disease activity (LDA) in patients already in remission with TNFi, in axial spondyloarthritis. Randomized, parallel, non-inferiority, open-label multicentre clinical trial. Patients were eligible if they had axial spondyloarthritis and had been in clinical remission for ≥ 6 months with any available TNFi (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, golimumab) at the dose recommended by product labelling. Patients were randomized by automated central allocation to continue the same TNFi dose schedule, or to reduce the dose by roughly half according to the protocol. The main outcome was the proportion of subjects with LDA after 1 year. Serious adverse reactions or infections were recorded. The trial stopped due to end of the funding period, after 126 patients were randomized; 113 patients (84.1% male, mean age (SD) 45.6 (13.0) years) were included in the main per-protocol subset. Non-inferiority was concluded for LDA at 1 year (47/55 (83.8%) patients in the full-dose and 48/58 (81.3%) patients in the reduced-dose arm, adjusted difference (95% CI) − 2.5% (− 16.6% to 11.7%)). Serious adverse reactions or infections were reported in 7/62 patients (11.3%) assigned to full dose and 2/61 patients (3.3%) assigned to reduced dose (pvalue = 0.164). In patients with ankylosing spondylitis in clinical remission for at least 6 months, dose reduction is non-inferior to full TNF inhibitor doses to maintain LDA after 1 year. Serious adverse events may be less frequent with reduced doses. EU Clinical Trials Registry, EudraCT 2011–005871-18and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01604629.

ABSTRACTMeropenem dosing in critically ill patients with septic shock and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is complex, with the recommended maintenance doses being 500 mg to 1,000 mg every 8 h (q8h) to every 12 h. This multicenter study aimed to describe the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of meropenem in this population to identify the sources of PK variability and to evaluate different dosing regimens to develop recommendations based on clinical parameters. Thirty patients with septic shock and CRRT receiving meropenem were enrolled (153 plasma samples were tested). A population PK model was developed with data from 24 patients and subsequently validated with data from 6 patients using NONMEM software (v.7.3). The final model was characterized by CL = 3.68 + 0.22 · (residual diuresis/100) and V= 33.00 · (weight/73)2.07, where CL is total body clearance (in liters per hour), residual diuresis is the volume of residual diuresis (in milliliters per 24 h), and Vis the apparent volume of distribution (in liters). CRRT intensity was not identified to be a CL modifier. Monte Carlo simulations showed that to maintain concentrations of the unbound fraction (fu) of drug above the MIC of the bacteria for 40% of dosing interval T(referred to as 40% of the ƒuT>MIC), a meropenem dose of 500 mg q8h as a bolus over 30 min would be sufficient regardless of the residual diuresis. If 100% of the ƒuT>MICwas chosen as the target, oligoanuric patients would require 500 mg q8h as a bolus over 30 min for the treatment of susceptible bacteria (MIC < 2 mg/liter), while patients with preserved diuresis would require the same dose given as an infusion over 3 h. If bacteria with MICs close to the resistance breakpoint (2 to 4 mg/liter) were to be treated with meropenem, a dose of 500 mg every 6 h would be necessary: a bolus over 30 min for oligoanuric patients and an infusion over 3 h for patients with preserved diuresis. Our results suggest that residual diuresis may be an easy and inexpensive tool to help with titration of the meropenem dose and infusion time in this challenging population.

Antiplatelet agents are used for prevention of thromboembolism in surgical patients and in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. However, up-to-date results of randomized studies comparing antiplatelet agents and oral anticoagulation have not been reported. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety profile of triflusal versus acenocoumarol for primary prevention of thromboembolism in the early postoperative period after implantation of a bioprosthesis. This is a prospective, multicentric, randomized, open, pilot trial in which four acute-care teaching hospitals participate. Patients will be randomly assigned to treatment with triflusal or acenocoumarol the day before valve replacement with a bioprosthesis. Primary outcome will be the combined endpoint of the rate of either thromboembolism or hemorrhage and valve-related mortality in each treatment group. Secondary outcomes will include the analysis of each of these rates separately together with permanent valve-related impairment according to the guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. A total of 200 patients will be recruited in a competitive manner (100 patients per arm) over an 18-month period. The study will be completed in 2 years. Treatment assigned will be open to investigators and patients because of the need of blood monitoring and dosage adjustment in oral anticoagulant therapy. In order to minimize the bias, randomization is centrally performed. The study medication will be given for 3 months being discontinued afterwards. Follow-up visits are scheduled at the time of patient's inclusion in the study and at 1, 3, and 6 months thereafter. Homogeneity of groups will be analyzed using the Student's t test, the Mann-Whitney U test, and the chi-square test, when appropriate. Rates of thromboembolism and hemorrhage will be calculated with the hazard function. In conclusion, antiplatelet treatment for patients undergoing valve replacement with a bioprosthesis is clinically relevant because of avoidance of inconveniences of oral anticoagulation (monthly blood testing, dosage adjustment) and decreased risk of bleeding. In case the results favor the use of antiplatelet drugs in these patients, this study will contribute to future development of strategies in the prevention of thromboembolism.