Search

A 28-year-old adult male with comorbidities developed quetiapine-induced hyponatremia, leading to critical illness and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Serum sodium levels reached 117 mmol/l, indicating a syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH). . Reducing medication dose, restricting water intake, and administering salt supplementation improved sodium levels. The case study suggests that quetiapine-induced hyponatremia should be rapidly diagnosed and treated in younger patients with critical illness and comorbidities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Case reports suggest that quetiapine or haloperidol use is associated with severe QT prolongation (SQTP) and torsades de pointes. The purpose of this study was to examine the incidences, risk factors, and outcomes of SQTP in quetiapine and haloperidol users. This study accessed electronic medical records from a multicenter health-care hospital system in Taiwan and included patients who received quetiapine or haloperidol therapy and had both baseline and follow-up electrocardiograms. SQTP was defined as a posttreatment corrected QT (QTc) interval exceeding 500 ms or an increase in QTc interval of >60 ms compared with the baseline value. We analyzed the risk factors and outcomes of SQTP using multivariate logistic regression. Mean increases in QTc interval were +8.3 ± 51.8 and +8.9 ± 44.0 ms after the administration of quetiapine (n = 8832) and haloperidol (n = 2341). Among these users, 1149 (13.0%) and 333 (14.2%) developed SQTP, respectively. Common risk factors for SQTP included old age, heart failure, hypokalemia, amiodarone use, and baseline QTc interval. SQTP in quetiapine users was significantly associated with ventricular arrhythmias (odds ratio 2.84; 95% confidence interval 1.95–4.13) and sudden cardiac death (odds ratio 2.29; 95% confidence interval 1.44–3.66). More than 10% of patients receiving quetiapine or haloperidol therapy developed SQTP, and many of them were exposed to risk factors for SQTP. SQTP in quetiapine users was significantly associated with increased risks of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Clinicians should be vigilant for ventricular arrhythmias in quetiapine users who have risk factors for SQTP. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In 2023, we observed the sixtieth anniversary of the article by a British psychiatrist, Geoffrey Hartigan, demonstrating, for the first time, the possibility of preventing the recurrence of mood disorders by using lithium salts. Herein, a history of prevention of recurrences of mood disorders both worldwide and in Poland will be presented concerning both lithium and other mood-stabilizing drugs. The merit for verifying the prophylactic lithium effect in the 1960-1970s should be given to Danish researchers, Mogens Schou and Poul Baastrup. In Poland, the first paper on prophylactic lithium appeared already in 1971. In the 1970s, French researchers showed prophylactic activity of valproic acid amide, and Japanese researchers - of carbamazepine. In the 1980s, studies on valproic acid amide were performed in the 2nd Psychiatric Clinic of the Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology led by Prof. Pużyński. Since the mid-1990s, 2nd generation mood-stabilizing drugs have been introduced, including some atypical antipsychotics (clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, aripiprazole, risperidone) and an anticonvulsant drug, lamotrigine, showing prophylactic activity in bipolar mood disorder. The studies on lithium resulted in the identification of factors connected with its prophylactic efficacy as well as the antisuicidal, antiviral, and neuroprotective effects of this drug. From a sixty-year perspective following Hartigan's article, it seems that his pioneering concept on the possibility of pharmacological influence on the course of mood disorders was fully confirmed. Current Polish recommendations on pharmacological prophylaxis of mood disorders were presented in the books Standardy leczenia niektórych zaburzeń psychicznych and Psychofarmakologia kliniczna, both published in 2022. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The botanical product kratom produces opioid-like effects at high doses and is sometimes used for opioid replacement by individuals with opioid use disorder. Mitragynine, a major alkaloid contained in kratom leaves, has been shown to inhibit multiple cytochromes P450 (CYPs) in vitro, including CYP2D6 and CYP3A. As such, kratom may precipitate pharmacokinetic drug interactions when co-consumed with certain medications. We present a case of a patient taking 150 mg venlafaxine (CYP2D6/3A substrate), 300 mg quetiapine (CYP3A substrate), and a high amount of kratom (~90 g) daily. The patient presented to the emergency department with serotonin syndrome and corrected electrocardiogram abnormalities that may have been secondary to supratherapeutic exposure to venlafaxine and/or quetiapine. The patient's symptoms resolved after discontinuation of venlafaxine and quetiapine. He was amenable to medication therapy for kratom discontinuation and successfully completed an at-home induction with buprenorphine/naloxone. This case report adds to the literature about potential pharmacokinetic kratom-drug interactions and suggests that buprenorphine/naloxone can facilitate recovery from kratom use disorder. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The study presents a case of a 64-year-old patient with diagnosed Parkinson's disease and coexisting REM sleep disorders (RBD) confirmed in a polysomnographic examination.. In this patient, the use of supplementary therapy -- quetiapine (50 mg/daily) -- due to psychotic disorders, resulted in speech disorders with sensory-motor mixed aphasia type. Aphasia occurred on the fourth day after beginning the treatment with atypical neuroleptic. In MRI examination of the head, no "fresh" cerebral ischemia was found. No focal status epilepticus was reported in the video EEG trial. Results. Complete cure occurred after discontinuation of quetiapine administration. Conclusions. Due to the above, the side-effects of quetiapine treatment were assumed as the cause of focal neurological disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Delirium is a frequent complication of critical illness in adult and pediatric populations and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Little is known about the incidence, risk, symptoms, or treatment of delirium in the NICU. Only 4 cases of NICU delirium have been reported, but many pediatric studies include infants. The Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium tool has been validated in neonatal and infant populations for identification of delirium. Initial treatment should focus on identification and reversal of the cause, with pharmacologic management reserved for patients with symptoms that do not resolve or that significantly impact medical care. Routine use of intravenous haloperidol should be avoided because of the high incidence of serious adverse effects, but it may be considered in patients with significant symptoms who are unable to take oral medications. Atypical antipsychotics (olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone) appear to be efficacious with a low incidence of adverse effects. Risperidone has weight-based dosing and a liquid dosage form available, making it a good option for use in the NICU. Additional data from large cohorts of NICU patients routinely screened for delirium, and treated as indicated, are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria is the property of Asociacion Colombiana de Psiquiatria and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Quetiapine is frequently prescribed off‐label in the community but little is known about the initiation and use of quetiapine in general (non‐psychiatry) hospital settings. Aim: This study examined the extent of off‐label quetiapine prescribing and rates of initiation of quetiapine in a general inpatient population of an Australian inner city teaching hospital, as well as the frequency of communication with community prescribers following discharge. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted of all patients admitted under all non‐psychiatric teams and prescribed quetiapine within a tertiary teaching hospital between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2016. All quetiapine prescribing information was extracted from an electronic medication management system (EMMS) and medical records were reviewed for a random sample of 100 patients prescribed quetiapine. Results: EMMS data indicated that 793 people were prescribed quetiapine over the study period. Quetiapine was most frequently prescribed once daily, with a median daily dose of 100 mg (interquartile range 37.5–200 mg). Eighty‐seven of the 100 medical records reviewed had corresponding discharge summaries, and potentially off‐label quetiapine prescribing was found in 48 people (55%); the most frequent off‐label indication was for agitation or delirium. Of the 33 people who had quetiapine initiated in hospital, 26 prescriptions (79%) were for off‐label indications. Of the 11 prescriptions (33%) continued at discharge, only three (27%) discharge summaries contained instructions to community prescribers regarding quetiapine. Conclusion: Off‐label prescribing of quetiapine was common in this sample of inpatients, and senior hospital staff should remain cautious of quetiapine prescribing for indications where the evidence of harms and benefits remains unclear. Communication with community prescribers could also be improved to reduce the risk of conversion from intended short‐term off‐label use to longer‐term use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Schizophrenia is a chronic psychotic disorder in which patients experience positive and negative symptoms for over six months. Schizophrenia is associated with early mortality, with 40% of this excess mortality due to suicide. This is a case of patient with schizophrenia who was treated with quetiapine after suffering a traumatic brain injury and recovered enough to be discharged to a rehabilitation unit. This case illustrates the neuroprotective effects of quetiapine in treating neurologic deficits in a patient who recently suffered a traumatic brain injury. Method: This is a case report of a patient with schizophrenia treated in the hospital setting. He was placed on quetiapine after suffering a traumatic brain injury due to a suicide attempt in which he shot himself with a nail gun. Results: The patient initially presented with neurologic deficits suggestive of traumatic brain injury (inattention, memory loss, muscle weakness) and psychosis from schizophrenia. He was treated with quetiapine and recovered enough to be discharged to a rehabilitation unit. Conclusion: Quetiapine, a second-generation antipsychotic, has been shown to significantly decrease blood–brain barrier hyperpermeability by preserving tight junction integrity in small animal models. This anti-inflammatory effect may also help to preserve neurogenesis in patients with traumatic brain injury, as shown in this case. This case may help elucidate the nature of quetiapine's neuroprotective effects in patients who have suffered traumatic brain injury and also highlights the need to further investigate other atypical antipsychotics and their potential neuroprotective role in treating traumatic brain injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Schizophrenia is a chronic disorder that requires long-term treatment to achieve symptom remission and quality of life improvement. Antipsychotic medications are primary treatments for schizophrenia patients. Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) have been recognized as first-line drugs in the treatment of schizophrenia. This study aimed at determining the prescription patterns of SGAs in schizophrenia outpatients in the National Mental Hospital in Indonesia. Methods: A retrospective study with descriptive analysis was conducted between October and December 2018, exclusive to data of the patients with schizophrenia only. Data were collected from the prescription records of schizophrenia outpatients. This study performed a descriptive analysis of patient characteristics, percentage of SGAs prescribed, regimen doses of SGAs, average number of SGAs prescribed per patient, and pattern of antipsychotics prescribed. Results: The most commonly used SGAs were risperidone 55%, followed by clozapine 38%, aripiprazole 3%, quetiapine 3%, and olanzapine 1%. Antipsychotics were generally prescribed in their recommended doses. Almost all SGAs were prescribed as polypharmacy, and the most common combination of SGAs were risperidone and clozapine. Conclusions: This study highlighted that risperidone was the major choice for treatment in the outpatient setting. Polypharmacy is the most common pattern prescription of SGAs in the National Mental Hospital in Indonesia. New studies should focus on the analyses of polypharmacy prospectively, and the role of pharmacist in collaboration with other health professionals in the managing of schizophrenia therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Quetiapine is an atypical antipsychotic prescribed for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, multiple drug abuse (MDA), generalized anxiety disorder, severe depression, dementia, and mood disorders. Prescription of quetiapine varies according to use, with side effects increasingly reported with higher doses. Many previous case reports highlighted the misuse of the drug. Here we studied the prescribing patterns of quetiapine in multiple drug abuse (MDA), depression, and psychosis patients in the Madinah region in Saudi Arabia. This is a retrospective single-center study carried out in the main referral hospital for mental health in Madinah, Saudi Arabia for the period December 2020 till December 2021. A total of 158 patients were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 30.5 ± 10.1 years. Male presented for 89.9 % of the patients. In terms of quetiapine indications, 46.2 % of patients used it for MDA, 29.7 % for psychosis, and 24.1 for depression. For all patients, quetiapine was used with a mean daily dose of 285.2 ± 222 mg and for a mean duration of 13.9 ± 15.4 weeks. Quetiapine was prescribed with a mean of 2.1 ± 2.2 prescriptions. Comparison between different indications shows that quetiapine was more frequently prescribed for MDA (p < 0.001). The MDA patients were significantly younger than in other groups (p = 0.001). All patients who received quetiapine for MDA were males. However, MDA patients received a smaller dose of quetiapine than other indications (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between groups in terms of the number of prescriptions, duration, and whether the patient was on other medications or not. These results have been confirmed by regression analysis, where male and younger ages represented a significant contributing factor to MDA compared to psychosis, 95 % CI: 8 x107 (8 x107 − 8 x107) and 0.943 (0.900–––0.987), respectively. Quetiapine was prescribed more frequently in MDA patients and younger individuals. Low dose was predominant in those patients, indicating a probability of drug abuse. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract The present work aims to discuss on Quality by Design based development and characterization of the sustained release mucoadhesive microspheres of quetiapine fumarate. The microspheres were prepared by non-aqueous solvent evaporation process. Factor screening study was carried out using fractional factorial design for identifying the influential factors. Systematic optimization of microspheres was accomplished by Box-Behnken design and characterized for particle size, entrapment efficiency, in vitro drug release and ex vivo mucoadhesion strength, which indicated that microspheres were consequence to be spherical and free flowing in nature. The microspheres exhibited high drug entrapment efficiency and in vitro drug release in a sustained manner, which was considered to be dependent on the concentration of rate controlling polymers. Ex vivo wash-off test on microspheres indicated good mucoadhesive property on excised goat intestinal mucosa. Out of all the accepted formulation, F6 was preferred as the optimized formulation. In vivo pharmacokinetic and brain biodistribution study revealed significant increase in the levels of drug in blood plasma and brain homogenates from the optimized formulation vis-à-vis the pure drug suspension. Overall, current study corroborated significant improvement in the biopharmaceutical attributes of quetiapine fumarate from mucoadhesive microspheres, which can be effectively used for management of depression and schizophrenia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This randomized clinical trial investigates if peer comparison letters targeting high-volume primary care prescribers of quetiapine meaningfully reduce their prescribing and examines quetiapine receipt by patients with low-value or guideline-concordant indications for therapy. Key Points: Question: Can behavioral nudges reduce inappropriate prescribing of antipsychotic agents and raise clinical quality for older and disabled patients, who often receive these drugs? Findings: In this randomized clinical trial, a peer comparison letter randomized across the 5055 highest Medicare prescribers of the antipsychotic quetiapine fumarate reduced prescribing for at least 2 years. Effects were larger than those observed in existing large-scale behavioral interventions, potentially because of the content of the peer comparison letter, which mentioned the potential for a review of prescribing activity. Meaning: Behavioral nudge interventions can raise the quality of prescribing, but research is still needed on how to most precisely target unsafe prescribing behavior. Importance: Antipsychotic agents, such as quetiapine fumarate, are frequently overprescribed for indications not supported by clinical evidence, potentially causing harm. Objective: To investigate if peer comparison letters targeting high-volume primary care prescribers of quetiapine meaningfully reduce their prescribing. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized clinical trial (intent to treat) conducted from 2015 to 2017 of prescribers and their patients nationwide in the Medicare program. The trial targeted the 5055 highest-volume primary care prescribers of quetiapine in 2013 and 2014 (approximately 5% of all primary care prescribers of quetiapine). Interventions: Prescribers were randomized (1:1 ratio) to receive a placebo letter or 3 peer comparison letters stating that their quetiapine prescribing was high relative to their peers and was under review by Medicare. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the total quetiapine days supplied by prescribers from the intervention start to 9 months. Secondary outcomes included quetiapine receipt from all prescribers by baseline patients, quetiapine receipt by patients with low-value or guideline-concordant indications for therapy, mortality, and hospital use. In exploratory analyses, the study followed outcomes to 2 years. Results: Of the 5055 prescribers, 231 (4.6%) were general practitioners, 2428 (48.0%) were in family medicine, and 2396 (47.4%) were in internal medicine; 4155 (82.2%) were male. All were included in the analyses. Over 9 months, the treatment arm supplied 11.1% fewer quetiapine days per prescriber vs the control arm (2456 vs 2864 days; percentage difference, 11.1% fewer days; 95% CI, −13.1% to −9.2% days; P <.001; adjusted difference, −319 days; 95% CI, −374 to −263 days; P <.001), which persisted through 2 years (15.6% fewer days; 95% CI, −18.1% to −13.0%; P <.001). At the patient level, individuals in the treatment arm received 3.9% (95% CI, −5.0% to −2.9%; P <.001) fewer days of quetiapine from all prescribers over 9 months, with a larger decrease among patients with low-value vs guideline-concordant indications (−5.9% [95% CI, −8.0% to −3.9%] vs −2.4% [95% CI, −4.0% to −0.9%], P =.01 for test that effects were equal for both patient groups). There was no evidence of substitution to other antipsychotics, and 9-month mortality and hospital use were similar between the treatment vs control arms. Conclusions and Relevance: Peer comparison letters caused substantial and durable reductions in quetiapine prescribing, with no evidence of negative effects on patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02467933 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Depression is the predominant pole of disability in bipolar disorder and compared with mania/hypomania, has less systematic research guiding the development of treatment especially in its acute phase (acute bipolar depression). The deficiency in the management of the acute bipolar depression largely reflects the natural divergence of opinion resulting from significant knowledge gaps. At present, there are only 3 approved drug treatments for acute bipolar depression: olanzapine/fluoxetine combination, quetiapine (immediate or extended release), and lurasidone (monotherapy or adjunctive to lithium or valproate). Nonapproved agents and nonpharmacologic treatment such as lamotrigine, antidepressants, modafinil, pramipexole, ketamine, and electroconvulsive therapy are often prescribed to treat acute bipolar depression. This article discusses the challenges of diagnosing bipolar depression, and reviews above treatment options for acute bipolar depression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim We examined the first- and second-line pharmacological treatment for delirium to determine which drugs were chosen, how and when second-line drugs were started, and the effectiveness and tolerability of those treatments. Methods A retrospective medical chart review was performed for delirium inpatients referred to the Department of Psychiatry, Hiroshima Citizens Hospital, from October 2011 to September 2012. Clinical diagnoses were based on ICD-10. We compared the baseline severity of delirium, duration needed for improvement, and rescue with antipsychotics between subjects given only first-line drugs and those switched to second-line drugs. Results We studied 194 consecutive patients including 127 men and 67 women whose average age was 76.5 ± 9.8 years. For first-line drugs, trazodone was most frequently prescribed (n = 100, 51.5%), followed by quetiapine (n = 57, 29.4%). Among patients treated with trazodone or quetiapine as first line treatment, 59 of 100 (59%) continued trazodone and 52 of 57 (91.2%) continued quetiapine. Duration needed for improvement did not differ significantly between patients treated with trazodone as a first line drug and those with quetiapine as same. Conclusion Trazodone can be a candidate drug as one of the first line drugs for delirium. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The antipsychotic drug quetiapine (QUT) has been frequently detected in sewage treatment plants. However, information on the fate of QUT in aquatic environments and its behavior during UV treatment is limited. In this study, QUT is shown not to be readily biodegradable in the Closed Bottle Test and the Manometric Respirometry Test according to OECD guidelines. The main biotransformation product (BTP) formed in the tests, a carboxylic acid derivative, was identified by means of high-resolution mass spectrometry. This BTP is presumably a human metabolite and showed higher detection rates than QUT in a river sampling campaign conducted in northern Germany. UV elimination kinetics of QUT at different initial concentrations (226.5, 45.3, 11.3, and 2.3 μmol L −1 ) were faster at lower initial concentrations. All seven phototransformation products (PTPs) could be still identified at initial concentration of 11.3 μmol L −1 . The photolytic mixture generated after 128 min of photolysis of QUT was not better biodegradable than QUT. Initial UV treatment of QUT led to the formation of several additional BTPs. Four of them were identified. The bacterial cytotoxicity and genotoxicity before and after phototransformation of QUT in a modified luminescent bacteria test (LBT) and the umu-test (ISO/FDIS 13829) showed cytotoxic effects in the LBT for QUT. Furthermore, PTPs had similar cytotoxic effects on luminescent bacteria. The umu-test did not reveal any genotoxic activity for QUT or PTPs. In conclusion, the release of QUT into sewage treatment plants and aquatic environments could result in the formation of a main BTP. Additional UV treatment of QUT would lead to the formation of additional BTPs. Moreover, treatment did not result in lower toxicity to tested organisms. In conclusion, UV treatment of QUT should be considered critically as a potential treatment for QUT in aquatic systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a rare, idiosyncratic, but life-threatening adverse reaction associated with the use of antipsychotic drugs. It is characterized by a tetrad of fever, rigidity, autonomic instability, and altered mental status. Failure to diagnose NMS early and institute appropriate treatment can result in serious medical complications and death. While diagnostic criteria for NMS exist, atypical presentations that lack one or more characteristic features pose a diagnostic dilemma to clinicians. The concept of atypical NMS has been proposed for such cases but remains controversial. We report a case of atypical NMS associated with overdose on clozapine and quetiapine and discuss the diagnostic challenges of an atypical presentation. In this case, the diagnosis was delayed due to the absence of rigidity, but later made after serum creatine kinase was found to be markedly elevated. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for NMS. Routine checking and trending of serum CK in patients on antipsychotic drugs who present with features of NMS is recommended to facilitate diagnosis. Future research is needed to define and validate threshold scores for existing diagnostic criteria for NMS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Synthetic cathinones are a class of novel psychoactive substances. a- Pyrrolidinopentiophenone (α-PVP), or "Flakka", is one of these substances. Users often present acutely psychotic or agitated. We present the case of a 20-year-old male without prior psychiatric history who was brought to the hospital by his family because of increasingly bizarre and erratic behavior after reported ingestion of Flakka. What ensued was a prolonged course of psychosis and severe catatonia. Synthetic cathinones are thought to cause catatonia in approximately 1% of cases. Awareness of the possible presentations associated with α-PVP intoxication is increasingly important and should be further explored, as they can have important implications in setting expectations for care. Additionally, providers should have a low threshold for asking patients about bath salt ingestion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Aim: To present a case of catatonia on exposure to quetiapine. Clinical details: We report the case of a 68‐year‐old man with bipolar affective disorder who experienced catatonia upon initiation of quetiapine on day 4 of his admission to hospital. He was commenced on quetiapine 50 mg at night which was increased to 100 mg the following night. He did not have a prior history of any reaction to the medication. Outcome symptoms: Resolved upon discontinuation of quetiapine. Conclusion: The importance of pharmacovigilance cannot be overemphasised. Clinicians need to be aware that catatonia may occur with the use of quetiapine and patients need to be closely monitored for unexpected reactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bipolar affective disorder is a debilitating illness that manifests as cyclical episodes of mood elevation and depression, but the treatment of the depressive episodes (i.e., bipolar depression) differs considerably from the treatment of major depressive disorder. In bipolar affective disorder, it is well known that patients spend a significantly greater amount of time in depressive episodes than manic or hypomanic episodes, yet there are currently just three Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of bipolar depression: (1) olanzapine/fluoxetine combination (2) quetiapine, both immediate- and extended-release, and (3) lurasidone. The literature review presented here focuses on the clinical trials that led to the Food and Drug Administration-approval of these second generation antipsychotics in the treatment of bipolar depression. The discussion highlights key considerations regarding overall treatment strategies to aid clinicians in the selection of pharmacologic agents. Recommended monitoring parameters, potential adverse effects, and pertinent counseling points for second generation antipsychotics used in bipolar depression are included. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ketamine immunoassay urine drug screen (UDS) is commonly used in Taiwan. However, there was limited report about possible drug which may cause false positive results in ketamine screen test. We report two cases who used quetiapine showed positive in ketamine urine immunoassay screen initially, and found to be false positive in confirmation test. Clinicians should be aware of the false positive result of ketamine UDS caused by currently used medication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Purpose The USA Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued warnings regarding the use of antipsychotics in patients with dementia in 2003 and 2005. We aimed to study the dose and duration of antipsychotic treatment in dementia, and to examine whether physicians' prescription behaviors changed after the FDA warnings. Methods Medical charts of outpatients who had Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, or mixed dementia were reviewed. Patients must have achieved a clinically stable state for at least 4 weeks after receiving antipsychotic treatment for agitation or psychosis. Demographics, clinical correlates, and duration of antipsychotic treatment were compared among different antipsychotic groups. Because the quetiapine group had the largest sample size, the optimal dose and duration of quetiapine treatment were compared among three time periods (before 2003, 2003–2005, after 2005). Results Stable state was achieved in 215 patients (80 had Alzheimer's disease, 117 vascular dementia, and 18 mixed dementia). Most patients (177) took quetiapine, 25 took risperidone, and 13 took sulpiride. The whole sample had a long total duration of antipsychotic treatment (median 525 days, mean 707 days). The median dose and total duration of antipsychotic treatment were 1.0 mg/day and 238 days for risperidone, 100 mg/day and 390 days for sulpiride, and 25 mg/day and 611 days for quetiapine, respectively. The optimal dose and total duration of quetiapine treatment decreased significantly after FDA warning in 2005, although the duration remained long. Conclusion The optimal doses of antipsychotics were not higher than those of western reports, but the total duration of antipsychotic treatment was quite long. Although our study suggests the prescription dosage and duration of antipsychotic treatment decreased significantly after FDA warning in 2005, the duration of treatment was still long. Given the serious safety concerns, more effort should be made to avoid unnecessary and prolonged prescription. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Quetiapine is an atypical antipsychotic agent, frequently used in psychiatry, often for symptomatic treatment against a number of mental disorders differing from the registration indications. One of the use is to soothe the clinical conditions caused by the use of various psychoactive substances. The paper presents and discusses the reports of quetiapine misuse, abuse, and even mental addiction, as well as symptoms similar to the so-called discontinuation syndrome, often mixed with withdrawal syndrome occurring in the course of addiction. Most reports concern males, and especially those with a history of other psychoactive substance abuse, and personality disorders, often in conflict with the law. Therefore, clinicians should be cautious when prescribing quetiapine to such patients. The article discusses potential mechanisms responsible for quetiapine abuse. This is probably related to its sedative and anxiolytic activity which results in the frequent use with stimulants. Also, high affinity for the H1 receptor, as antihistamines agents causes rewarding action. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Quetiapine is a dibenzothiazepine derivative, similar to clozapine, which has the highest risk of causing blood dyscrasias, especially neutropenia. There are some case reports about this side effect of quetiapine, but possible risk factors are seldom discussed and identified. A case of a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma that developed neutropenia after treatment with quetiapine is described here. Case Report: A 62-year-old Taiwanese widow with bipolar disorder was diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma at age 60. She developed leucopenia after being treated with quetiapine. After quetiapine was discontinued, her white blood cell count returned to normal. Conclusions: Although neutropenia is not a common side effect of quetiapine, physicians should be cautious about its presentation and associated risk factors. Hepatic dysfunction may be one of the possible risk factors, and concomitant fever may be a diagnostic marker for adverse reaction to quetiapine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Presently, the use of atypical antipsychotics is getting increasingly widespread. There are several mania/hypomania cases that have been associated with atypical antipsychotic treatment that also display antimanic, antidepressive and anxiolytic effects in addition to their antipsychotic effects. In this study, a case of schizophrenia in which manic symptoms developed after increasing the dosage of quetiapine to 300mg/day, and subsequently disappeared after cessation of treatment is presented. Although the blockage of 5HT2 receptors and the disinhibition of frontal dopamine secretion seemed to be the reasons for the development of the mania/hypomania related to atypical antipsychotics, the mechanism is not clear. During the use of atypical antipsychotics, clinicians should be cautious to patients' mood fluctuations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi is the property of Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: The American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation recommends monitoring for corrected QT (QTc) prolongation. The incidence of QTc prolongation in the general public is unknown. Episodic measurements may miss patients at risk. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of QTc prolongation in hospitalized telemetry patients when beat-to-beat monitoring, confirmed by manual calculation, was used for detection. Methods: After institutional review board approval was obtained, waveforms of telemetry-monitored patients were analyzed consecutively until 50 patients with prolonged QTc were identified (QTc >470 milliseconds in men and >480 milliseconds in women). Prolongation was confirmed by manual calculation. Incidence was calculated. Clinical risk factors and the outcomes of torsades de pointe or sudden death were explored. Results: Telemetry waveforms were evaluated for 192 444 minutes (3207.4 hours) of recordings, yielding 8 076 653 QTc measurements. In 50 consecutive patients (24 [48%] men), 100% had verified episode(s) of QTc prolongation. Home medications that could result in QTc prolongation were identified in 9 patients (18%). Hospital medications with risk of QTc prolongation were administered to 31 patients (62%). Sixteen patients (32%) were not on a QTc-prolonging medication. Corrected QT prolongation risk factors in the history were found in 2 patients (4%) and hypomagnesemia or hypokalemia was seen in 6 patients (12%). Twelve-lead electrocardiogram detected prolonged QTc in 13 of 45 patients (26%). Prolongation of QTc was detected by standard of care manual analysis in 4 patients (8%). No patient experienced torsades de pointe or sudden death. Conclusion: With beat-to-beat analysis, QTc prolongation was detected in 100% of 50 consecutive patients where standard of care (nursing manual analysis or 12-lead electrocardiogram) would have detected 28%. Hospital medications were more likely to contribute to QTc prolongation than home medications. Implications for Practice: More specific definitions for determining proarrhythmic risk are needed as automated technology improves the capture rate of QTc prolongation events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Biomédica: Revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud is the property of Instituto Nacional de Salud of Colombia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Abstract: Objectives: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a chronic illness associated with a major burden on quality of life (QOL) and health care resources. Aripiprazole augmentation to antidepressant treatment was recently approved for patients with MDD responding insufficiently to antidepressant treatment in Turkey. The objective was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of aripiprazole augmentation in this indication compared with olanzapine and quetiapine augmentation from a payer perspective. Methods: A lifetime economic model was built simulating transitions of patients with MDD between major depressive episodes (MDEs) and remission. During MDEs, patients were treated with adjunctive aripiprazole, quetiapine, or olanzapine. Patients who did not respond switched to subsequent treatment lines. Comparative effectiveness between adjunctive aripiprazole, quetiapine, and olanzapine was estimated by using an indirect comparison. Resource utilization and costs were obtained from Turkish studies. Results: Over a lifetime horizon, patients treated with aripiprazole spent less time in MDEs than did patients treated with quetiapine (−11 weeks) and olanzapine (−7 weeks). On average, patients treated with aripiprazole showed improvement in QOL compared with patients treated with quetiapine (+0.054 quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]) and olanzapine (+0.039 QALYs) combined with cost saving of 593 Turkish lira (TL) versus quetiapine and 485 TL versus olanzapine. The probability that adjunctive aripiprazole would be cost-effective among the three strategies ranged between 74% and 75% for willingness-to-pay values between 0 TL and 100,000 TL per QALY gained. Conclusions: This is the first lifetime health-economic model in Turkey that takes patient heterogeneity into account when assessing QOL and costs of different adjunctive strategies in MDD. The results indicate that adjunctive treatment with aripiprazole provides health benefits at lower costs in patients with MDD when compared with quetiapine and olanzapine augmentation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The article focuses on a research conducted to study the causes and interventions for aggression. It informs about the causes for aggressive behavior including discrimination which increases conflicts with others, sexual frustration and low social status. It mentions that several antipsychotic drugs including risperidone, clozapine, and quetiapine and some applied behavior analysis intervention have been proved as effective for treating aggression.

The article presents a study which evaluated the effects of the most frequently used atypical antipsychotics in patients over 40 years with psychotic symptoms associated with primary psychiatric disorders. Equipoise-stratified randomization was used in the study. Quetiapine was discontinued midway through the study due to high incidence of serious adverse events. It was noted that caution in the use of the drugs is guaranteed in middle-aged and older patients.

Delirium occurs commonly in acutely ill hospitalised patients, particularly in the elderly or in cardiac or orthopaedic surgery patients, or those in intensive care units (ICUs). Delirium worsens outcome. Pharmaceutical agents such as antipsychotics and, in the critically ill, dexmedetomidine, are considered therapeutic despite uncertainty regarding their efficacy and safety. Using MEDLINE, we reviewed randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published between 1977 and April 2012 evaluating a pharmacologic intervention to prevent or treat delirium in critically ill and non-critically ill hospitalised patients. The number of prospective RCTs remains limited. Any conclusions about pharmacologic efficacy are limited by the small size of many studies, the inconsistency by which non-pharmacologic delirium prevention strategies were incorporated, the lack of a true placebo arm and a failure to incorporate ICU and non-ICU clinical outcomes. A research framework for future evaluation of the use of medications in both ICU and non-ICU is proposed. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Copyright of Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria is the property of Asociacion Colombiana de Psiquiatria and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article discusses a study to determine whether the higher dose of quetiapine was associated with more extrapyramidal symptoms in patients with persistent symptoms of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. The safety, tolerability, and efficacy of high-dose quetiapine are examined. It was observed that the use of quetiapine outside the approved dose range has no advantage.

The article discusses the results of a study which compared the effectiveness and safety of quetiapine monotherapy with switching to placebo or lithium as maintenance treatment in bipolar I disorder. The study showed that both quetiapine and lithium increased time to recurrence of manic and depressive events. It concludes that prevention of manic and depressive events can be done effectively by switching to lithium than placebo.

Priapism is characterized by a prolonged and painful erection in the absence of sexual desire and arousal. Priapism is a rare and serious side effect of psychotropic drugs, and is thought to be attributable to blockage of alpha-1 adrenergic receptors in the corpus cavernosum. Although priapism is commonly associated with typical antipsychotics, there are some (but not many) case reports of priapism due to atypical antipsychotics. This side effect has been reported in patients taking ziprasidone, risperidone, clozapine, quetiapine, aripiprazole, and olanzapine. Not all antipsychotics bind to alpha-1 adrenergic receptors with the same intensity; as compared to other antipsychotics, quetiapine has an intermediate affinity. Priapism could be considered an idiosyncratic reaction, because it is correlated neither with the dose nor duration of psychotropic drug use. Herein we present a case of priapism caused by a single 300-mg dose of quetiapine, and a brief review priapism in the light of this case. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi is the property of Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Abstract: Background: Older adults are susceptible to a variety of illnesses, many of which can be treated with medications that may need to be used for the long term. Considerable attention has been paid to drugs that, in addition to their intended function, may have an anticholinergic effect that results in undesirable side effects, including impairment in cognition. Cholinesterase inhibitors are used as procholinergic drugs to improve cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer''s disease. We hypothesized that some of the drugs commonly used by older adults might, in addition to their intended function, also have procholinergic effects by virtue of inhibiting cholinesterases. Objective: To determine the potential procholinergic nature of some of the commonly used drugs by examining their cholinesterase inhibiting properties. Methods: The Ellman spectrophotometric method was used with human acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase, in the absence and presence of increasing concentrations of each test drug. To compare inhibition potencies, from enzyme kinetic data, we determined half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50 values) for each cholinesterase by each drug. Results: Of the 28 drugs examined, over half (17/28) inhibited one or both of the human cholinesterases. The inhibition potencies were often within 1 to 2 orders of magnitude of reversible cholinesterase inhibitors currently used to treat Alzheimer''s disease. These included trazodone, quetiapine, risperidone, indapamide, and perindopril. Conclusions: Many drugs used by older adults for other reasons have potentially clinically relevant procholinergic effects. The effect of cumulative cholinesterase inhibition merits clinical evaluation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: When treating acute bipolar mania, the speed of onset of anti-manic effects is crucial. Quetiapine and divalproex ER are widely used agents to treat acute mania. Rapid dose administration regimens for divalproex ER and for quetiapine have been described. We conducted a naturalistic, head-to-head, pilot study comparing the efficacy and safety of rapidly titrated divalproex ER and quetiapine in acutely manic inpatients, with the primary outcome being improvement within the first seven days. Method: Thirty consenting bipolar patients with acute mania (Young Mania Rating Scale >17 ) needing hospitalization due to acute mania were randomized to receive rapidly loaded divalproex ER (30mg/kg/day) or rapidly titrated quetiapine (200mg Day 1, raised by 200mg/day up to 800mg as tolerated). Assessments were made on Day 1 (baseline), Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, and Day 21 and included Young Mania Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impressions-Severity, Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement, and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale. Raters but not patients or treating physicians were blinded (single-blinded study). Results: Subjects in both treatment groups exhibited significant and rapid improvement in their mania starting at Day 3 with few significant adverse effects; however, there were no significant differences in the degree or rate of improvement between the two treatment groups in any of the efficacy or adverse effects scales. Conclusion: Results of this small study indicate that rapid-dose administration of both quetiapine and divalproex ER produce rapid improvement in acute mania within the first seven days and both seem to be well tolerated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this article, we provide information on patient-reported side effects from a cross-section of realworld patients. Specifically, data on side effects were tabulated for patients taking at least one of the following atypical antipsychotic medications: aripiprazole, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone. Approximately 54 percent of the 353 respondents reported having experienced a side effect as a result of taking an atypical antipsychotic medication. Most common side effects mentioned included the following: weight gain/hunger, tiredness/lethargy, and lack of coordination/muscle problems, such as tenderness, twitches, and tremors. Of those experiencing a side effect, less than 25 percent reported this side effect to their physician. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Quetiapine is an atypical antipsychotic approved by the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) for use in the treatment of schizophrenia, acute mania, and bipolar depression. Pharmacologically, it has antagonistic effects on serotonin 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A, dopamine D1 and D2, histamine H1, and adrenergic α1 and α2 receptors. In addition to reports of its use in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, many studies have examined the use of quetiapine in the treatment of anxiety disorders and substance use disorders. In the treatment of patients with psychotic or bipolar disorder with a comorbid substance abuse disorder even though quetiapine was prescribed primarily for the treatment of the underlying psychotic symptoms, patients taking this medication reported a significant reduction in substance use. Yet, there are also case reports of quetiapine abuse and dependence; in particular among prisoners and patients diagnosed with substance abuse. Though quetiapine should be used peroral, it is also used intranasally and intravenously in these patient groups. Moreover, in some cases quetiapine is combined with other substances, such as cocaine or marijuana, to increase sedation. This abuse of quetiapine is thought to occur due to the anxiolytic and sedative effects of the drug. There are no controlled studies on quetiapine dependence in the literature and it remains unknown whether or not quetiapine causes dependence. This review aimed to present all published case reports on quetiapine abuse and to discuss the possible mechanisms that underlie its abuse and dependence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria is the property of Asociacion Colombiana de Psiquiatria and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Quetiapine is an atypical antipsychotic approved by the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) for use in the treatment of schizophrenia, acute mania, and bipolar depression. Pharmacologically, it has antagonistic effects on serotonin 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A, dopamine D1 and D2, histamine H1, and adrenergic a1 and a2 receptors. In addition to reports of its use in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, many studies have examined the use of quetiapine in the treatment of anxiety disorders and substance use disorders. In the treatment of patients with psychotic or bipolar disorder with a comorbid substance abuse disorder even though quetiapine was prescribed primarily for the treatment of the underlying psychotic symptoms, patients taking this medication reported a significant reduction in substance use. Yet, there are also case reports of quetiapine abuse and dependence; in particular among prisoners and patients diagnosed with substance abuse. Though quetiapine should be used peroral, it is also used intranasally and intravenously in these patient groups. Moreover, in some cases quetiapine is combined with other substances, such as cocaine or marijuana, to increase sedation. This abuse of quetiapine is thought to occur due to the anxiolytic and sedative effects of the drug. There are no controlled studies on quetiapine dependence in the literature and it remains unknown whether or not quetiapine causes dependence. This review aimed to present all published case reports on quetiapine abuse and to discuss the possible mechanisms that underlie its abuse and dependence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to determine preventive and protective effects of chronic orally administration with quetiapine (QUE) against anxiety-like behavior and cognitive impairments in rats exposed to the enhanced single prolonged stress (ESPS), an animal model that is used to study post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and to detect changes in the expression of cortical phosphorylated p44/42 extracellular-regulated protein kinase (pERK1/2). Before or after exposure to ESPS paradigm, consisting of 2-h constraint, 20-min forced swimming, etherinduced loss of consciousness, and an electric foot shock, rats were given orally QUE (10 mg/kg daily) for 14 days. Animals were then tested in the open field (OF), elevated plus-maze (EPM), and Morris water maze (MWM). Brains were removed for immunohistochemical staining of pERK1/2. ESPS exposure resulted in pronounced anxiety-like behavior compared to unexposed animals. ESPS-exposed animals also displayed marked learning and spatial memory impairments. However, QUE treatment (both before and after ESPS exposure) significantly ameliorated anxiety-like behavior, learning and spatial memory impairments. ESPS also markedly reduced the expression of pERK1/2 in the prefrontal cortex, medial amygdala nucleus, and cingulate gyrus. Both before and after ESPS exposure QUE treatments significantly elevated the reduced pERK1/2 expression in the three brain regions. QUE has preventive and protective effects against stress-associated symptoms and the changes in pERK1/2 functions may be associated with the pathophysiology of traumatic stress and the therapeutic efficacy of anti-PTSD therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Quetiapine, an atypical antipsychotic, has been the subject of a series of case reports that suggest a potential for misuse/abuse. The available cases indicate a male predominance; oral, intranasal, or intravenous routes of administration; misuse/abuse in jail or inpatient psychiatric settings; and subjects with extensive histories of polysubstance abuse. While possible pharmacological explanations have been proffered, compared to the other atypical antipsychotics, there is no clear explanation for an alleged higher risk of misuse/abuse with quetiapine. Likewise, there are no available animal or human empirical studies to evaluate risk. At this juncture, clinicians in psychiatric and primary care settings can only remain alert to a potential risk, particularly in patients who meet the current demographic profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There have been case reports about second-generation antipsychotics causing pancreatitis. In addition, there has been a case report of pancreatitis without diabetic ketoacidosis associated with the use of quetiapine, specifically, and a case report of a patient receiving quetiapine who rapidly developed hyperglycemia and acidosis without evidence of acute or chronic pancreatitis. We present what we believe to be the first report of a patient who developed pancreatitis and life-threatening diabetic ketoacidosis while receiving quetiapine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria is the property of Thieme Medical Publishing Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article presents a large data-base study which compares the use of quetiapine and trazodone in reducing the time to rehospitalization for patients with alcohol dependence. It was found that there is no difference between the two medications in decreasing the time to rehospitalization when used with other medications and that the risk increases when they are used alone. It stresses the need for more data on the safety and effectiveness of the drugs.

Using analogue functional analysis, we monitored changes in the rates of aggression and self-injury in a 50-year-old female diagnosed with severe intellectual disability and mood disorder. Functional analyses were conducted while the individual was treated with quetiapine (Seroquel) and citalopram (Celexa) and after the quetiapine was discontinued. Discontinuation of quetiapine resulted in differential responding patterns for aggression and self-injury. This case Study provides support for functional assessment of problem behaviors during medication changes to determine if psychotropic medications are associated with subsequent changes in behavior. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]