Search

Cohesion establishment and maintenance are carried out by proteins that modify the activity of Cohesin, an essential complex that holds sister chromatids together. Constituents of the replication fork, such as the DNA polymerase alpha-binding protein Ctf4, contribute to cohesion in ways that are poorly understood. To identify additional cohesion components, we analyzed a ctf4Delta synthetic lethal screen performed on microarrays. We focused on a subset of ctf4Delta-interacting genes with genetic instability of their own. Our analyses revealed that 17 previously studied genes are also necessary for the maintenance of robust association of sisters in metaphase. Among these were subunits of the MRX complex, which forms a molecular structure similar to Cohesin. Further investigation indicated that the MRX complex did not contribute to metaphase cohesion independent of Cohesin, although an additional role may be contributed by XRS2. In general, results from the screen indicated a sister chromatid cohesion role for a specific subset of genes that function in DNA replication and repair. This subset is particularly enriched for genes that support the S-phase checkpoint. We suggest that these genes promote and protect a chromatin environment conducive to robust cohesion.

Inbred mice have been routinely used in studies of genetic effects that determine behavioral variation due to circadian rhythm. In addition to activity patterns (Act), we aimed to characterize variations in the circadian rhythm of deep-body temperature (T(db)) and heart rate (HR) in a specific genetic model of differential cardiorespiratory control. Radiotelemeters were implanted in C3H/HeJ (C3; n = 11) and C57BL/6J (B6; n = 11) inbred strains. Reciprocal first-generation offspring, B6C3F1/J (B6F1; n = 8) and C3B6F1 (C3F1; n = 3) mice, were included to initiate an evaluation of heritable phenotypes. Mice were housed individually in a facility maintained at 23-24 degrees C, and the light-dark cycle was set at 12-h intervals. In each animal, repeated measurements were obtained at 30-min intervals, and the circadian patterns of Act, T(db), and HR were assessed by novel statistical methods that detailed the periodic function for each strain. During the dark phase, B6 mice demonstrated two distinct peaks in Act and T(db) relative to a single early peak for C3 mice. In contrast to the parental strains, B6F1 and C3F1 mice demonstrated intermediate second peaks in Act and T(db). With respect to HR, the C3 strain demonstrated a significantly (P < 0.01) greater daily average compared with B6 mice. The circadian rhythm in HR differed significantly from the Act and T(db) patterns in B6 mice (but not in C3 mice); that is, the periodicity in HR for B6 mice preceded the rise and fall in Act and T(db) during both peaks. The B6 phenotype was also observed in F1 mice. In conclusion, these data suggest that the circadian regulation of Act, T(db), and HR vary significantly among C3, B6, and F1 mice. Furthermore, phenotypic differences between C3 and B6 strains can be used to explore the genetic basis for differential circadian regulation of body temperature and HR.