Search

Aims. This study aims to compare procedural parameters and clinical efficacy of remote magnetic navigation (RMN) vs. manual navigation (MAN) approach for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods. 146 patients with AF were enrolled in the study. In the RMN group (n=57), patients were treated with the CARTO® 3 in combination with the Niobe ES system. In the MAN group (n=89), ablation was performed with the EnSite Velocity and TactiCath? Quartz catheter with direct contact force measurement. Procedural time, ablation time, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose and ablation counts were measured and compared between the groups. Recurrence of AF was evaluated after 6 months of follow-up. Results. Mean procedure times (236.87±64.31 vs. 147.22±45.19 min, P<0.05), counts of RF applications (74.30±24.77 vs. 49.15±20.33, P<0.05) and total RFA times (4323.39±1426.69 vs. 2780.53±1157.85 s, P<0.05) were all significantly higher in the RMN than in the MAN group, respectively. In the same order, mean X-ray dose (9722.6±7507.4 vs. 8087.9±6051.5 mGy/cm2, P=0.12) and mean total X-ray exposure time (8.07±4.20 vs. 9.54±5.47 min, P=0.08) were not statistically different. At 6-month follow-up, freedom from AF was similar in RMN and MAN group for paroxysmal (60.8% and 73%, respectively, P=0.42) and persistent AF (69.6% and 75.0%, respectively, P=0.77). Conclusions. Due to the fact that mid-term clinical outcomes showed no significant differences in AF recurrences between groups and manual ablation strategy provided more favorable results regarding acute procedural parameters, we can conclude that the remote magnetic navigation is not superior to the manual approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of this review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety between remote magnetic navigation (RMN) and manual control navigation (MCN) for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.Methods: We searched the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library databases using the key words AF, ablation and magnetic navigation.Results: Eighteen studies were identified in this analysis including 4046 patients comparing RMN and MCN in AF ablation, which were all non-randomized controlled studies. No significant difference of AF recurrence rate (40% vs. 38%, OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.82-1.22, p = 0. 97) and acute success rate in achieving pulmonary vein isolation (91% vs. 93%, OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.16-1.17, p = 0.10) was found between RMN and MCN. However, compared with MCN, RMN was associated with significantly lower complication rate (2% vs. 5%, OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.69, p = 0. 0003) and shorter fluoroscopy time (MD -9.71 min, 95% CI -15.80 to -3.63, p = 0.002). Procedure time (MD 47.05 min, 95% CI 27.5-66.58, p < 0.00001) and ablation time (MD 15.90 min, 95% CI 9.62-22.18, p < 0.00001) of RMN guided AF ablation were significantly longer than those of MCN.Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that RMN is as effective as MCN in achieving pulmonary vein isolation and freedom from AF recurrence, and has superior safety with less complications and shorter fluoroscopy time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Remote magnetic navigation (RMN) is often used in combination with a 3‐dimensional mapping system to perform catheter ablations. This study aim to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of a novel 3D‐mapping system, EnSite Precision, combined with RMN for catheter ablation of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs), and compared it to the procedures performed by CARTO3 with RMN. Methods: Forty‐three consecutive PVC patients were either ablated with the guidance of EnSite Precision (n = 22) or CARTO (n = 21) navigated by RMN. Procedure‐related details, acute and long‐term success were assessed. Results: Patient characteristics between both the groups were similar (age: 47.1 ± 19.8 vs 47.1 ± 12.7, female: 63.6% vs 57.1%). No significant difference was found in the procedure time (99.5 ± 30.4 vs 92.9 ± 24.8 min, P = 0.436), mapping time (18.6 ± 12.8 vs 15.5 ± 10.2 min, P = 0.390), radiofrequency ablation time (333.4 ± 267.0 vs 469.3 ± 343.1 s, P = 0.154), fluoroscopy time (4.0 ± 1.9 vs 3.8 ± 2.0 min, P = 0.635), and X‐ray dose (1.8 ± 1.4 vs 2.0 ± 1.2 Gycm2, P = 0.649) between the two groups. No significant procedural complication occurred in either group. In addition, there was no significant differences regarding the acute success rate (90.9% vs 90.5%, P = 0.961) and long‐term success rate (86.4% vs 81.0%, P = 0.631) after 16.2 ± 6.2 months of follow‐up between the two groups. Conclusions: RMN combined with EnSite Precision mapping system is effective and safe for catheter ablation of PVCs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Percutaneous transcatheter radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation with remote controlled magnetic navigation (RMN) has been shown to reduce radiation exposure to patients and physicians compared with conventional manual (MAN) ablation techniques. Methods Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation was performed utilizing RMN in 214 consecutive patients and MAN ablation techniques in 229 patients. We compared the fluoroscopy and procedural times between RMN and MAN catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Secondary objectives included comparing acute procedural success and short-term complication rates between both ablation strategies. Results Fluoroscopy time was significantly shorter in the RMN group than the MAN group (53.5±30.1 vs 68.1±27.6 min, respectively; p <0.01); however, the total procedural time was longer in the RMN group (280.2±74.4 min vs 213.1±64.75, respectively; p >0.001). Further subgroup analysis of the most recent 50 ablations each from the RMN and MAN groups, to attenuate the RMN learning curve effect, showed an even greater difference in fluoroscopy time (RMN vs MAN: 53.5±30.1 vs 68.1±27.6 min), though a consistently longer procedure time with RMN (249.5±65.5 vs 186.3±65.6 min, respectively). The acute procedural success rate was comparable between the groups (98.6% vs 95.6%, respectively; p =0.07). The rates of acute complications were similar in both groups (2.3% vs 4.8%, respectively; p =0.16). Conclusions In radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation, RMN appears to significantly reduce fluoroscopy time compared with conventional MAN ablation, though at a cost of increased total procedural time, with comparable acute success rates and safety profile. A reduction in procedure and fluoroscopy times is possible with gaining experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article offers information on the Catheter Guidance Control and Imaging (CGCI) remote catheter navigation system (RNS) system, which features real-time magnetic navigation of catheters. It says that CGCI has 8 electromagnets that allow magnetic fields, which in real-time reshaping offer three dimensional (3D) motion of a magnetized electrophysiology ablation. Moreover, CGCI enables joystick and automated navigation and offers high reproducible, rapid, and accurate automated mode navigation.