Search

The information society depends increasingly on risk assessment and management systems as means to adequately protect its key information assets. The availability of these systems is now vital for the protection and evolution of companies. However, several factors have led to an increasing need for more accurate risk analysis approaches. These are: the speed at which technologies evolve, their global impact and the growing requirement for companies to collaborate. Risk analysis processes must consequently adapt to these new circumstances and new technological paradigms. The objective of this paper is, therefore, to present the results of an exhaustive analysis of the techniques and methods offered by the scientific community with the aim of identifying their main weaknesses and providing a new risk assessment and management process. This analysis was carried out using the systematic review protocol and found that these proposals do not fully meet these new needs. The paper also presents a summary of MARISMA, the risk analysis and management framework designed by our research group. The basis of our framework is the main existing risk standards and proposals, and it seeks to address the weaknesses found in these proposals. MARISMA is in a process of continuous improvement, as is being applied by customers in several European and American countries. It consists of a risk data management module, a methodology for its systematic application and a tool that automates the process.

In the last years, Cyber–physical systems (CPS) have attracted substantial mainstream, especially in the industrial sector, since they have become the focus of cyber-attacks. CPS are complex systems that encompass a great variety of hardware and software components with a countless number of configurations and features. For this reason, the construction, validation, and diagnosis of security in CPS become a major challenge. An invalid security requirement for the CPS can produce partial or incomplete configuration, even misconfigurations, and hence catastrophic consequences. Therefore, it is crucial to ensure the validation of the security requirements specification from the earlier design stages. To this end, Onto-CARMEN is proposed, a semantic approach that enables the automatic verification and diagnosis of security requirements according to the ENISA and OWASP recommendations. Our approach provides a mechanism for the specification of security requirements on top of ontologies, and automatic diagnosis through semantic axioms and SPARQL rules. The approach has been validated using security requirements from a real case study.