Search

When two gratings drifting in different directions are superimposed, the resulting stimulus can be perceived as two overlapping component gratings moving in different directions or as a single pattern moving in one direction. Whilst the motion direction of component gratings is already represented in visual area V1, the majority of previous studies have found processing of pattern motion direction only from visual area V2 onwards. Here, we question these findings using multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA). In Experiment 1, we presented superimposed sinusoidal gratings with varying angles between the two component motions. These stimuli were perceived as patterns moving in one of two possible directions. We found that linear support vector machines (SVMs) could generalise across stimuli composed of different component motions to successfully discriminate pattern motion direction from brain activity in V1, V3A and hMT+/V5. This demonstrates the representation of pattern motion information present in these visual areas. This conclusion was verified in Experiment 2, where we manipulated similar plaid stimuli to induce the perception of either a single moving pattern or two separate component gratings. While a classifier could again generalise across stimuli composed of different component motions when they were perceived as a single moving pattern, its performance dropped substantially in the case where components were perceived. Our results indicate that pattern motion direction information is present in V1.

The debate about the scope and limits of unconscious visual processing under continuous flash suppression (CFS) has created a heterogeneous set of divergent findings that are yet to be reconciled. Attention has been suggested as an important factor in modulating the processing of suppressed visual information under CFS. Specifically, Eo et al. (2016) reported that semantic processing under CFS can be significantly facilitated when spatial attention is diverted away from the suppressed stimulus. Based on event-related potential (ERP) findings involving the N400, they proposed that inattention attenuates interocular suppression and thereby makes semantic processing available unconsciously, potentially reconciling conflicting evidence in the literature. In this study, we aimed to further investigate the “CFS-attenuation-by-inattention” hypothesis using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA). We tested whether the decodability of object category increases under CFS when attention is diverted away from the suppressed stimulus in a spatial cueing task. Our results provide no evidence for the “CFS-attenuation-by-inattention” hypothesis, but show higher decoding accuracies for visible stimuli than for invisible stimuli. We discuss the implications of our findings for the important endeavor of trying to reconcile the divergent reports of unconscious processing under CFS.