1. Long-Term Safety and Feasibility of Left Bundle Branch Pacing in a Large Single-Center Study.
- Author
-
Lan Su, Songjie Wang, Shengjie Wu, Lei Xu, Zhouqing Huang, Xiao Chen, Rujie Zheng, Limeng Jiang, Ellenbogen, Kenneth A., Whinnett, Zachary I., Weijian Huang, Su, Lan, Wang, Songjie, Wu, Shengjie, Xu, Lei, Huang, Zhouqing, Chen, Xiao, Zheng, Rujie, Jiang, Limeng, and Huang, Weijian
- Subjects
PILOT projects ,RESEARCH ,BUNDLE-branch block ,TIME ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,EVALUATION research ,CARDIAC pacing ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,COMPARATIVE studies ,HEART beat ,ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY ,RESEARCH funding ,HIS bundle ,LONGITUDINAL method - Abstract
Background: Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a novel pacing method and has been observed to have low and stable pacing thresholds in prior small short-term studies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of LBBP in a large consecutive diverse group of patients with long-term follow-up.Methods: This study prospectively enrolled 632 consecutive pacemaker patients with attempted LBBP from April 2017 to July 2019. Pacing parameters, complications, ECG, and echocardiographic measurements were assessed at implant and during follow-up of 1, 6, 12, and 24 months.Results: LBBP was successful in 618/632 (97.8%) patients according to strict criteria for LBB capture. Mean follow-up time was 18.6±6.7 months. Two hundred thirty-one patients had follow-up over 2 years. LBB capture threshold at implant was 0.65±0.27 mV at 0.5 ms and 0.69±0.24 mV at 0.5 ms at 2-year follow-up. A significant decrease in QRS duration was observed in patients with left bundle branch block (167.22±18.99 versus 124.02±24.15 ms, P<0.001). Postimplantation left ventricular ejection fraction improved in patients with QRS≥120 ms (48.82±17.78% versus 58.12±13.04%, P<0.001). The number of patients with moderate and severe tricuspid regurgitation decreased at 1 year. Permanent right bundle branch injury occurred in 55 (8.9%) patients. LBB capture threshold increased to >3 V or loss of bundle capture in 6 patients (1%), 2 patients of them had a loss of conduction system capture. Two patients required lead revision due to dislodgement.Conclusions: This large observational study suggests that LBBP is feasible with high success rates and low complication rates during long-term follow-up. Therefore, LBBP appears to be a reliable method for physiological pacing for patients with either a bradycardia or heart failure pacing indication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF