Search

A gene (NPH1) responsible for approximately 90% of the purely renal form of familial juvenile nephronophthisis, a progressive tubulo-interstitial kidney disorder, maps to human chromosome 2. We report the construction of a YAC-based contig spanning the critical NPH1 region and the flanking genetic markers. This physical map was integrated with a refined genetic map that restricted the NPH1 interval to about 2 cM; this interval corresponds in a maximum physical distance of 3.5 Mb. The entire contig covers 9 cM between the loci D2S135 and D2S121. The maximum physical distance between these two markers is approximately 11.3 Mb. Forty-five sequence-tagged sites, including six genes, have been located within this contig. PAX8, a member of the human paired box gene family, that is expressed in the developing kidney, was assigned outside the restricted NPH1 critical region and cannot therefore be regarded as a candidate gene. This set of overlapping clones represents a useful resource for further targeted development of genetic markers and for the characterization of candidate genes responsible for juvenile nephronophthisis. Copyright 1995, 1999 Academic Press

IFNγ inhibits the rise in transferrin receptor mRNA level which is normally observed when stationary WISH cells are stimulated to proliferate. This effect is not attributable to a change in the transcription rate of the transferrin receptor gene or in the cytoplasmic stability of the mRNA. The IFNγ-induced reduction of the transferrin receptor mRNA content is already present at the nuclear level to an extent comparable to that observed in whole cells. Thus, IFNγ does not impair the passage of this mRNA from the nuclear to the cytoplasmic compartment but probably interferes with a nuclear post-transcriptional event during the processing of the immature transferrin receptor mRNA. Two different levels of regulation of transferrin receptor mRNA have been previously reported. Iron modulates the cytoplasmic stability of this mRNA through the binding of a specific cytoplasmic factor, whereas cell growth variation influences the transcription of this gene. Our results suggest the existence of another mechanism of regulation for transferrin receptor gene expression not so far considered. Furthermore, the distinction between the mechanism of regulation exerted by IFNγ and that exerted by cell proliferation on transferrin receptor gene expression suggests that, in WISH cells, the IFN-lnduced transferrin receptor decay is not a consequence of cell growth arrest but rather one of the causes of the antiproliferative effect of IFN through iron deprivation.