Search

Aortic valve disease in children presents a considerable surgical challenge. When repair is not feasible, the Ross procedure represents the best option for replacement as it allows growth and does not require anticoagulation. However, there is a risk of progressive autograft dilatation, and eventual failure of the autograft with severe regurgitation. Autograft stabilization has proven beneficial in adults but has not been widely adopted in children undergoing the Ross procedure. We present a series of techniques for autograft stabilization which can be used at different stages of development, from infants to fully grown adolescents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Ross procedure is rarely considered in older patients. The aim of this study is to compare the perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients aged 50 years and older with younger patients after the Ross procedure. Between 1992 and 2018, 455 patients underwent the Ross procedure utilizing the inclusion technique. Patients with redo surgery, nonaortic procedures, and unsupported root replacement were excluded. The remaining were matched for native valve morphology, valve lesion, and annular manipulation and yielded 96 matched pairs. Preoperative and operative characteristics, perioperative outcomes, survival rates, valve-related adverse events, and valve hemodynamics were assessed. There was no in-hospital mortality. The median follow-up was 11 years for both cohorts. Overall survival at 15 years was similar: 99% (95% confidence interval [CI] 89.8%-99.8%) for patients aged ≥50 years and 98% (95% CI 89.3-99.7%) for younger patients. Patients 50 years and older had a notable freedom from Ross-related reintervention at 15 years: 94% (95% CI 84.8%-97.7%) vs 90% (95% CI 80.2%-95.6%) in younger patients. The mixed model analysis revealed that being 50 years and older was not significantly associated with higher autograft gradient or regurgitation. Interestingly, being 50 years and older correlated with decreased allograft regurgitation and stenosis. Older patients undergoing the Ross procedure had comparable outcomes to younger patients. Patients aged 50 years and over who are high-functioning with minimal comorbidities should be considered for the Ross procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Limited data exist on long-term pulmonary valve function after the Ross procedure. This study sought to determine the long-term function of the pulmonary valve in 443 consecutive adult patients who underwent a Ross procedure. All 443 patients who underwent a Ross procedure between November 1992 and March 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. All underwent pulmonary valve replacement using a cryopreserved pulmonary allograft. Freedom from the study's outcomes were calculated using Kaplan Meier survival. Risk factors for valve failure were analyzed using Cox regression. Mean age at time of operation was 39 years (range: 15-66 years). There was 1 (0.2%, 1 of 443) operative mortality. Nine patients required reintervention on the pulmonary allograft at a mean 6.1 years (range: 1-12 years) after Ross procedure. Patients required pulmonary allograft reintervention for infective endocarditis (n = 4), severe pulmonary stenosis (n = 4), or severe pulmonary regurgitation (n = 1). Freedom from pulmonary allograft reintervention was 98.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 97.1%-99.6%), 97.7% (95% CI 95.1%-98.9%), 96.6% (95% CI 93.3%-98.3%), and 96.6% (95% CI 93.3%-98.3%) at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, respectively. Freedom from pulmonary allograft dysfunction (at least moderate pulmonary regurgitation and/or mean systolic gradient ≥ 25 mm Hg and/or reintervention) was 94.5% (95% CI 91.6%-96.4%), 88.1% (95% CI 83.6%-91.4%), 84.9% (95% CI 79.6%-88.9%), and 78.3% (95% CI 69.5%-84.9%) at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, respectively. No risk factors were identified to influence pulmonary valve durability. The pulmonary valve allograft gives excellent long-term function when used in adults undergoing the Ross procedure. Reintervention on the pulmonary valve is rare and significant pulmonary allograft dysfunction is uncommon. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Recent large randomized trials and metaanalyses have shown that, for patients with diabetes mellitus and advanced coronary artery disease, coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) was superior to percutaneous intervention. We investigated whether total arterial revascularization (TAR) conferred an additional survival advantage for diabetic patients having CABG. Methods We reviewed 63,592 cases from an audited, collaborative Australian cardiac surgical database. A total of 34,181 patients undergoing first time isolated CABG from 2001 to 2012 were identified. Of the 34,181, 11,642 (34.1%) were diabetic patients, and TAR was performed in 12,271 of 34,181 (35.9%). Of the 11,642 diabetic patients, TAR was performed in 3,795 (32.6%) and non-TAR in 7,847 (67.4%). Propensity matching resulted in 6,232 matched pairs of patients who did and patients who did not have TAR. Data were linked to the National Death Index. Results In the propensity matched sample, of 6,232 diabetic patients, 2,017 (32.4%) underwent TAR and 1,967 (31.6%) did not ( p = 0.337). Mean follow-up was 4.9 years. Perioperative mortality, including 30-day mortality, was similar: 1.2% (24 of 2,017) for TAR and 1.4% (28 of 1,967) for non-TAR ( p = 0.506). Late mortality was less among diabetic patients who underwent TAR, 10.2% (205 of 2,017), than no TAR, 12.2% (240 of 1,967; p = 0.041). Kaplan-Meier survival for the diabetic TAR group at 1, 5, and 10 years was 96.2%, 88.9%, and 82.2%, respectively, versus 95.4%, 87.5%, and 78.3% for the diabetic non-TAR group (log rank, p = 0.036). Conclusions In a large propensity matched cohort of patients having CABG, TAR demonstrated further long-term prognostic benefit for diabetic patients, in the context of equivalent perioperative mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Total arterial revascularization (TAR) is adopted to overcome late vein graft atherosclerosis, and occlusion. Uptake of TAR remains low despite reports suggesting superior survival. Previous studies primarily involved single sites and short-term follow-up. We report the influence of TAR on long-term survival in a large multicenter patient cohort. Methods We reviewed 63,592 cases from an audited collaborative multicenter database. Of those, 34,181 consecutive patients undergoing first-time isolated coronary artery bypass (CABG) from 2001 to 2012 were studied. The data were linked to the National Death Index. We compared outcomes in patients who underwent TAR (n = 12,271) with outcomes in those who did not (n = 21,910). The influence of TAR on 10-year all-cause late mortality was assessed by propensity score analyses in 6,232 matched pairs. Results The 30-day mortality was 0.8% (96/12,271) for TAR patients and 1.8% (398/21,910) for non-TAR patients ( p < 0.001). Late mortality was 7.5% (918/12,271) for TAR patients and 8.9% (1,952/21,910) for non-TAR patiets ( p < 0.001). The mean follow-up time was 4.9 years. In the propensity-matched cohort, the perioperative mortality was 0.9% (53/6,232) for TAR patients versus 1.2% (76/6,232) for non-TAR patients ( p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival in the matched cohort at 1, 5, and 10 years was 97.2%, 91.3%, and 85.4% for TAR patients and 96.5%, 90.1%, and 81.2% for non-TAR patients ( p < 0.001). Late mortality was 8.0% (n = 500) for TAR patients and 10.0% (n = 622) for non-TAR patients ( p < 0.001). Stratified Cox proportional hazards models showed lower risk for all-cause late mortality in the TAR group (TAR:HR 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 0.90, p < 0.001). Conclusion TAR is associated with low perioperative mortality and, importantly, improved long-term survival and could be used more liberally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Ross procedure is seldom offered to adults less than 60 years of age who require aortic valve replacement except in a few high-volume centers with documented expertise. Inserting the pulmonary autograft as an unsupported root replacement may lead to increasing reoperations on the aortic valve in the second decade. Methods: Of 333 patients undergoing the Ross procedure between October 1992 and June 2012, the study group of 310 consecutive patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 39.3 ± 12.7 years (limits 16–63) had the aortic root size adjusted to match the pulmonary autograft, which was inserted as a root replacement, with the aorta closed up around it to provide autologous support. Results: The mean follow-up time was 9.4 years; the actuarial survival was 97% at 16 years; and freedom from the composite of all reoperations on the aortic valve and late echocardiographic-detected aortic regurgitation greater than mild was 95% at 5 years, 94% at 10 years, and 93% at 15 years. Overall freedom from all reoperations on aortic and pulmonary valves was 97% at 5 years, 94% at 10 years, and 93% at 15 years. All results were better for the patients presenting with predominant aortic stenosis (98% freedom at 15 years) than for those with aortic regurgitation (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Autologous support of the pulmonary autograft leads to excellent results in the groups presenting with aortic stenosis and mixed aortic stenosis/regurgitation and to good results for those presenting with pure aortic regurgitation. The Ross procedure, using one of the proven, durable techniques available, should be considered for more widespread adoption. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: Our objective was to identify risk factors associated with 30-day mortality after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in the Australian context and to develop a preoperative model for 30-day mortality risk prediction. Summary Background Data: Preoperative risk associated with cardiac surgery can be ascertained through a variety of risk prediction models, none of which is specific to the Australian population. Recently, it was shown that the widely used EuroSCORE model validated poorly for an Australian cohort. Hence, a valid model is required to appropriately guide surgeons and patients in assessing preoperative risk. Methods: Data from the Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons database project was used. All patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting between July 2001 and June 2005 were included for analysis. The data were divided into creation and validation sets. The data in the creation set was used to develop the model and then the model was validated in the validation set. Preoperative variables with a P value of less than .25 in χ2 analysis were entered into multiple logistic regression analysis to develop a preoperative predictive model. Bootstrap and backward elimination methods were used to identify variables that are truly independent predictors of mortality, and 6 candidate models were identified. The Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) and prediction mean square error were used to select the final model (AusSCORE) from this group of candidate models. The AusSCORE model was then validated by average receiver operating characteristic, the P value for the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, and prediction mean square error obtained from n-fold validation. Results: Over the 4-year period, 11,823 patients underwent cardiac surgery, of whom 65.9% (7709) had isolated coronary bypass procedures. The 30-day mortality rate for this group was 1.74% (134/7709). Factors selected as independent predictors in the preoperative isolated coronary bypass AusSCORE model were as follows: age, New York Heart Association class, ejection fraction estimate, urgency of procedure, previous cardiac surgery, hypercholesterolemia (lipid-lowering treatment), peripheral vascular disease, and cardiogenic shock. The average area under the receiver operating characteristic was 0.834, the P value for the Hosmer–Lemeshow χ2 test statistic was 0.2415, and the prediction mean square error was 0.01869. Conclusion: We have developed a preoperative 30-day mortality risk prediction model for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting for the Australian cohort. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: To determine the association between previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and results after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Background: Increasing numbers of patients undergoing CABG have previously undergone PCI. Methods: We analyzed consecutive first-time isolated CABG procedures within the Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons Database from June 2001 to May 2008. Logistic regression and propensity score analyses were used to assess the risk-adjusted impact of prior PCI on in-hospital mortality and major adverse cardiac events. Cox regression model was used to assess the effect of prior PCI on mid-term survival. Results: Of 13,184 patients who underwent CABG, 11,727 had no prior PCI and 1,457 had prior PCI. Mean follow-up was 3.3 ± 2.1 years. Patients without prior PCI had a higher EuroSCORE value (4.4 ± 3.3 vs. 3.6 ± 3.0, p < 0.001), were older, and more likely to have left main stem stenosis and recent myocardial infarction. There was no difference in unadjusted in-hospital mortality (1.65% vs. 1.55%, p = 0.78) or major adverse cardiac events (3.0% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.99) between patients with or without prior PCI. After adjustment, prior PCI was not a predictor of in-hospital (odds ratio: 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76 to 2.0, p = 0.41) or mid-term mortality at 6-year follow-up (hazard ratio: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.75 to 1.18, p = 0.62). Conclusions: In this large registry study, prior PCI was not associated with increased short- or mid-term mortality after CABG. Good outcomes can be obtained in the group of patients undergoing CABG who have had previous PCI. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: The effect of training on outcomes in cardiac surgery is poorly studied. We aimed to study the results of coronary artery bypass grafting procedures performed by surgeons in training across our state with respect to short- and midterm postoperative outcomes. Methods: All coronary artery bypass grafting surgeries performed by trainee surgeons between July 2001 and December 2006 were compared with those performed by consultant surgeons using mandatory prospectively collected statewide data. Early mortality; prolonged ventilation or intensive care unit stay; return to operating theater for bleeding, stroke, myocardial infarction, or renal failure; and 5-year survival were compared using propensity score analysis. Results: A total of 7745 surgeries were included in this study. Trainees performed 983 (13%) surgeries. Trainee surgeries had longer perfusion and crossclamp times. Crude early postoperative outcomes were similar between trainee and consultant surgeries. After propensity score adjustment, early outcomes remained similar, with the exception of myocardial infarction (0.8% in trainee surgeries vs 0.4% in consultant surgeries, P = .046). Adjusted 1-, 3-, and 5-year survivals were similar between trainee and consultant surgeries: 95.3% versus 95.5%, 90.8% versus 92.0%, and 86.3% versus 87.1%, respectively. Conclusion: Coronary artery bypass grafting performed by trainee surgeons within a supervised program is safe with acceptable short- and midterm outcomes. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting (redo CABG) shows improving outcomes, but with varying degrees of improvement. We assessed contemporary outcomes after redo CABG to determine if redo status is still a risk factor for early postoperative complications and midterm survival. Methods: Isolated CABG procedures (June 1, 2001 to May 31, 2008) within the Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons Cardiac Surgery Database were included. Redo status as a predictor for early outcomes was assessed with logistic regression analysis. Midterm survival was determined from the National Death Index. Effect of redo status on midterm survival was assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Inclusion criteria were met by 13,436 patients, and 458 (3.4%) underwent redo CABG. Operative mortality was 4.8% for redo CABG and 1.8% for first-time CABG (p < 0.001). After adjustment, redo status remained a predictor for operative mortality (odds ratio [OR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 3.6), myocardial infarction (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.6 to 6.0), and prolonged ventilation (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.0). Unadjusted survival was lower for the redo CABG group vs the first-time CABG group at up to 6 years (p = 0.01, log-rank test. After adjusting for differences in patient variables, redo status was not a predictor of midterm survival (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.35; p = 0.85). Conclusions: Early postoperative outcomes of redo CABG are encouraging. Midterm survival is excellent; however, redo remains a significant risk factor for operative mortality in contemporary practice. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background. The radial artery (RA) has been used extensively by us as a way of reducing the use of the saphenous vein. It has been hoped that the RA will maintain greater late patency than the saphenous vein. We evaluated our initial 5-year experience with the RA in coronary surgery.Methods. We studied 6,646 consecutive patients who had a single RA (4,872), or bilateral RA (1,774), as coronary grafts, from June 1995 to June 2000. Angiograms were performed mostly in symptomatic patients, or as part of a research project in asymptomatic patients.Results. The patients’ mean age was 65.1 years; 23% had diabetes, 14% had unstable angina, and 42% had prior myocardial infarction. An average of 3.3 grafts per patient were performed, 87% from arterial conduit. Conduits used were RA (8,420), left internal thoracic artery (6,296), and right internal thoracic artery (1,076). Operative mortality occurred in 58 (0.9%) patients, stroke in 92 (1.4%), deep sternal infection in 97 (1.4%), reoperation for hemorrhage in 56 (0.9%), and myocardial infarction in 52 (0.8%). Peak mean postoperative creatine kinase MB (CKMB) was 16.5 IU/L. Two patients developed fingertip ischemia. Postoperative angiographic RA patency was 90.2% (333 of 369 distal anastomoses).Conclusions. Good early clinical and angiographic results can be achieved by using the RA in coronary surgery. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]