Search

Seven beef cattle from a herd accidentally exposed to acrylamide and N‐methylolacrylamide while grazing were observed for eight months. They showed clinical signs of impaired nerve function, mainly in the hindlegs, with varying degrees of weakness and ataxia. The animals were irritable, nervous and hypersensitive to touch. Both pupils of the most badly affected animal were dilated and it had poor pupillary light responses; it also showed signs of axonal neuropathy. Selected haematological and clinical chemistry variables were normal. The severity of the neurological signs was correlated with the concentrations of haemoglobin adducts of acrylamides. The animals recovered substantially after their exposure. The gestations of four of the animals which were in calf proceeded normally.

Exposure to acrylamide (AA) has been monitored by mass spectrometric detection of the adduct, N-(2-carbamoylethyl)valine (CEV), to the N-termini of hemoglobin (Hb), according to the N-alkyl Edman method. In these studies, a conspicuous background level, about 40 pmol/g of globin, of apparently the same adduct was regularly observed in Hb from persons without known exposure to AA. For testing of the hypothesis that this adduct originates from AA formed in cooking, rats were fed fried animal standard diet for 1 or 2 months. These animals exhibited a strong increase of the level of the studied Hb adduct, compared to control rats fed unfried diet. By gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry, the identity with CEV was confirmed by the concordance of the product ion spectrum of the studied adduct with that of a verified standard and by interpretation of the fragment ions. Further support of the chemical structure, at the same time pinpointing AA as the causative reactive factor, was obtained through the demonstration that AA is formed in the heating of the feed and that the level of AA in the fried feed is compatible with the measured levels of the CEV adduct. The raised CEV adduct levels observed in experimental animals are of a magnitude that is similar to the background level in nonsmoking humans. These data render it likely that cooking of food is a major source of the background dose of AA also in humans. An evaluation of cancer tests of AA and available data for its metabolism leads to the estimation that the background dose of AA is associated with a considerable cancer risk.