Search

Introduction: Antibiotic resistance, associated with inappropriate drug use, is a global public health threat. The pharmaceutical sectors in developing countries are poorly regulated leading to antibiotic sales and use without a prescription. The study documents the treatment of acute illnesses in households and the antibiotic dispensing practices of medicine sales outlets in Eastern region, Ghana.Method: Twice-weekly illness recall visits were made to 12 households in three rural communities over eight consecutive weeks. Detailed fieldnotes were taken and analysed using a thematic approach. Quantitative counts of health events and treatment were also conducted. Dispensing practices were systematically observed and documented in three rural and three urban medicine outlets for analysis.Result: Fever, abdominal, and respiratory symptoms were the most common causes of ill-health in the 12 households. Most (65%) medicine-use events involved self-treatment with pharmaceuticals; 40% of medicine-use events involved antibiotics, often without a prescription. Although the number of antibiotic transactions without prescription in rural medicine outlets (n = 139, 27.4%) was statistically significantly more than in urban pharmacies (n = 140, 13.5%); z = 6.7, p < .0001), the volume of antibiotics sold in pharmacies was higher. Penicillins were the most commonly dispensed antibiotics constituting 30% of antibiotic sales in urban medicine outlets and 46% in rural ones. The lack of controls in the dispensing of antibiotics, community knowledge and use of antibiotics in ways inconsistent with biomedical recommendations, poverty and perceived barriers to formal healthcare were factors that influenced the inappropriate use of antibiotics.Conclusion: Self-medication, including antibiotic self-prescription, constitutes an integral part of healthcare in the study settings and the qualitative data provides a contextual understanding of over-the-counter antibiotic acquisition and use. Inappropriate antibiotic use is apparent in the study settings. Stricter regulation of the pharmaceutical sector, training of dispensers and evidence-based treatment guidelines, and public education are potential interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• COVID-19 exacerbated existing and created new barriers to accessing abortion services in Germany. • Accessing abortion services was more difficult in Germany during the pandemic. • Financial constraints, privacy issues, and lack of abortion providers hinder abortion access. • Secrecy and privacy issues are significant barriers to accessing abortion services. The World Health Organization recognizes abortion as essential health care and has encouraged governments to ensure access to abortion services throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the threat of infection combined with government responses to COVID-19 have impacted access to abortion services globally. This study explores access to abortion in Germany during the pandemic. This study used a mixed-methods design. An analysis of data collected by Women on Web (WoW) was carried out to assess women's reasons for choosing telemedicine abortion outside the formal health system in Germany during the pandemic. Descriptive statistics were generated for 2057 requests for telemedicine abortion received by WoW between March 2020-March 2021. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight healthcare professionals involved in the provision of abortion services to explore how they perceive of women's access to abortion services in Germany during the pandemic. The quantitative analysis found that preferences and needs for privacy (47.3%), secrecy (44.4%) and comfort (43.9%) were the most common reasons for choosing telemedicine abortion. COVID-19 was another important reason (38.8%). The thematic analysis of the interviews was organized into two overarching themes: service provision, and axes of difference. The pandemic affected the provision of abortion services as well as the circumstances of women seeking abortion. The main barriers to access were financial constraints, privacy issues, and lack of abortion providers. Throughout the pandemic, accessing abortion services was more difficult for many women in Germany, especially women experiencing multiple and overlapping forms of discrimination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]