Search

There is controversy about whether the amniotic fluid contains bacteria. With the use of sequencing-based methods, recent studies report that the amniotic fluid is colonized by microorganisms. However, background-contaminating DNA might lead to false-positive findings when such a low microbial biomass sample is examined. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the midtrimester amniotic fluid of patients who subsequently had normal pregnancy outcomes contains a microbial signature. In this prospective cohort study, 42 amniotic fluid samples were collected from 37 pregnancies (5 twin and 32 singletons) during genetic amniocentesis in the midtrimester. The subsequent pregnancy outcomes of all the participants were followed. Multiple methods were used to detect the presence of microorganisms in this study, which included cultivation, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, and 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. Multiple positive control samples (n=16) served as quality control samples and included 3 adult fecal samples, 4 vaginal swabs, and 9 artificial bacterial communities that were run in parallel with negative control samples (n=12) that included 4 samples from the hospital operating room and 8 samples from the laboratory, to account for background-contaminating DNA during each step of the experiments. No bacteria under anaerobic or aerobic conditions or genital mycoplasmas were cultured from any of the amniotic fluid samples. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction did not reveal greater copy numbers of 16S ribosomal RNA gene in amniotic fluid samples than in negative control samples. 16S Ribosomal RNA gene sequencing did not indicate a significant difference in the microbial richness or community structures between amniotic fluid and negative control samples. With multiple methods of microbiologic inquiry, no microorganisms were identified in the midtrimester amniotic fluid of healthy pregnancies with a normal pregnancy outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is controversy about whether the amniotic fluid contains bacteria. With the use of sequencing-based methods, recent studies report that the amniotic fluid is colonized by microorganisms. However, background-contaminating DNA might lead to false-positive findings when such a low microbial biomass sample is examined.Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the midtrimester amniotic fluid of patients who subsequently had normal pregnancy outcomes contains a microbial signature.Study Design: In this prospective cohort study, 42 amniotic fluid samples were collected from 37 pregnancies (5 twin and 32 singletons) during genetic amniocentesis in the midtrimester. The subsequent pregnancy outcomes of all the participants were followed. Multiple methods were used to detect the presence of microorganisms in this study, which included cultivation, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, and 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. Multiple positive control samples (n=16) served as quality control samples and included 3 adult fecal samples, 4 vaginal swabs, and 9 artificial bacterial communities that were run in parallel with negative control samples (n=12) that included 4 samples from the hospital operating room and 8 samples from the laboratory, to account for background-contaminating DNA during each step of the experiments.Results: No bacteria under anaerobic or aerobic conditions or genital mycoplasmas were cultured from any of the amniotic fluid samples. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction did not reveal greater copy numbers of 16S ribosomal RNA gene in amniotic fluid samples than in negative control samples. 16S Ribosomal RNA gene sequencing did not indicate a significant difference in the microbial richness or community structures between amniotic fluid and negative control samples.Conclusion: With multiple methods of microbiologic inquiry, no microorganisms were identified in the midtrimester amniotic fluid of healthy pregnancies with a normal pregnancy outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]