Search

Your search keyword '"Zolty, R."' showing total 6 results
Start Over Author "Zolty, R." Database Supplemental Index
6 results on '"Zolty, R."'

1. Quality of life and prognosis in heart failure: results of the beta-blocker evaluation of survival trial (best)

Author

Tate CW 3rd, Robertson AD, Zolty R, Shakar SF, Lindenfeld J, Wolfel EE, Bristow MR, and Lowes BD

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quality of life (QOL) was a prespecified secondary end point in the Beta-Blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial. The Beta-Blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial used four QOL questionnaires to evaluate patient health status over time in response to treatment with placebo or bucindolol. The goal of the current study was to determine the relationship between the different questionnaires, assess the effect of treatment on health status, and evaluate the association between changes in health status and prognosis. METHODS: The San Diego Heart Failure (SDHF), Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLHF), Patient Global Assessment (PGA), and Physician Global Assessment (PhyGA) questionnaires were measured at baseline through 48 months of follow-up. For SDHF and MLHF, changes from baseline were calculated. Spearman correlation was used to assess relationships, and Cox Proportional Hazards regression was used to predict time to all-cause mortality, and mortality or heart failure hospitalization, bivariately and multivariately. To determine whether beta-blocker treatment affected QOL, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare treatment groups. RESULTS: At 12 months, SDHF (r = +0.56, P = .0001), PGA (r = +0.36, P = .0001), and PhyGA (r = +0.37, P = .0001) correlated with MLHF. SDHF (P = .0001), MLHF (P = .0004), PGA (P = .0001), and PhyGA (P = .0001) were all strongly associated with all-cause mortality, with low values of each associated with a lower hazard. For the combined end point of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization, change in QOL with each instrument had a P value of .0001. At 12 months, bucindolol-treated patients had improvement in both PhyGA and PGA compared with placebo; neither the SDHF nor the MLWF instrument distinguished between the two treatment groups unless a worst-rank assignment was used for patients who died. CONCLUSION: The four instruments correlate with each other and predict clinical end points, suggesting that each is a valid measure of health status. According to the PGA and the PhyGA, bucindolol improves QOL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2007
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Severe Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction May Reverse with Renal Transplantation: Uremic Cardiomyopathy and Cardiorenal Syndrome

Author

Zolty, R., Hynes, P. J., and Vittorio, T. J.

Abstract

Chronic heart failure (CHF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are serious medical conditions with significant morbidity and mortality. Emerging evidence indicates that the function of these two organ systems are affected by each other in a complex interplay. Most patients with CKD suffer frequently from cardiac abnormalities including left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), left ventricular dilatation (LVD), left ventricular (LV) diastolic andor systolic dysfunction. Although previously thought that LV systolic dysfunction was an absolute contraindication to renal transplantation, several observational studies have shown this not to be true and that transplantation can lead to significant improvement in LV systolic function. Furthermore, correction of the uremic state by renal transplantation leads to improvement of LVD and possibly regression of LVH. In fact, the reduction of LVH postkidney transplantation was shown to be dependent on adequate renal function and hypertension control. Diabetes mellitus does not seem to be a confounding factor in the improvement of uremic cardiomyopathy with renal transplantation.

Published
2008
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Severe Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction May Reverse with Renal Transplantation: Uremic Cardiomyopathy and Cardiorenal Syndrome

Author

Zolty, R., Hynes, P.J., and Vittorio, T.J.

Abstract

Chronic heart failure (CHF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are serious medical conditions with significant morbidity and mortality. Emerging evidence indicates that the function of these two organ systems are affected by each other in a complex interplay. Most patients with CKD suffer frequently from cardiac abnormalities including left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), left ventricular dilatation (LVD), left ventricular (LV) diastolic and/or systolic dysfunction. Although previously thought that LV systolic dysfunction was an absolute contraindication to renal transplantation, several observational studies have shown this not to be true and that transplantation can lead to significant improvement in LV systolic function. Furthermore, correction of the uremic state by renal transplantation leads to improvement of LVD and possibly regression of LVH. In fact, the reduction of LVH postkidney transplantation was shown to be dependent on adequate renal function and hypertension control. Diabetes mellitus does not seem to be a confounding factor in the improvement of uremic cardiomyopathy with renal transplantation.

Published
2008
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results