Search

This article represents the first systematic examination of BBC coverage of one of the most controversial rural issues in a generation, namely the culling of badgers (a protected species) to stop the spread of bovine TB in England. While the BBC has certain regulatory responsibilities set out in its guidelines to provide duly impartial coverage it has been regularly criticised for being biased. Little is known about the BBC's performance other than what is suggested by critics, previous research having focused on press coverage. Based on an original content analysis of news, current affairs and factual output this article assesses the BBC's coverage. It shows that while competing voices and perspectives were balanced its coverage was not that distinct from its commercial rivals, with both framing the issue as a conflict over badgers rather than about the spread of a disease affecting livestock and livelihoods, and both focusing on a narrow set of voices involved in the conflict. • Systematic examination of bias in BBC coverage of the culling of badgers to stop the spread of bovine TB in England. • No evidence of bias against certain rural communities, pursuits and businesses, nor failing to understand rural matters. • Selected indicators did reveal coverage was problematic. • BBC missed opportunities to broaden and contextualize the agenda, widen the selection of news actors, and challenge actor claims. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper examines the relationship between neoliberal styles of animal disease governance and farmers' understandings of disease and nature. In the UK, new styles of animal disease governance has promised to shift the costs and responsibilities of disease management to farmers, creating opportunities for farmers to take responsibility for disease control themselves and opening up new markets for disease control interventions. Focussing on the management of bovine Tuberculosis (bTB) and drawing on interviews with 65 cattle farmers, the paper examines how farmer responses to these new styles of animal disease governance are shaped by their own knowledges and understandings of nature and disease. In particular, the paper examines how two key narratives of nature – the idea of ‘natural balance’ and ‘clean and dirty badgers’ – lead farmers to think about the control of bTB in wildlife (such as the choice between badger culling and/or vaccination) in very specific ways. However, whilst discourses of cost and responsibility appear to open up choice opportunities for farmers, that choice is constrained when viewed from the perspective of farmer subjectivities and narratives of nature. Discourses of neoliberalism as control rather than choice are therefore revealed, drawing attention to the complexities and plural strategies of neoliberal governance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Bovine TB is a disease that affects cattle and the wildlife badger, species Meles meles, in Ireland and the UK, and badgers have been implicated in the spread of the disease in cattle. Efforts to eradicate the disease that have included localized badger culling, have not been successful. In a study to understand how the disease spreads, Kelly and More [1] determined that the disease spatially clusters in cattle herds and estimated the practical spatial ranges at which this occurs. We extend this work by examining possible anisotropy in clustering and the consequences for TB control policy. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Summary: Amongst the members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC), M. tuberculosis is mainly a human pathogen, whereas M. bovis has a broad host range and is the principal agent responsible for tuberculosis (TB) in domestic and wild mammals. M. bovis also infects humans, causing zoonotic TB through ingestion, inhalation and, less frequently, by contact with mucous membranes and broken skin. Zoonotic TB is indistinguishable clinically or pathologically from TB caused by M. tuberculosis. Differentiation between the causative organisms may only be achieved by sophisticated laboratory methods involving bacteriological culture of clinical specimens, followed by typing of isolates according to growth characteristics, biochemical properties, routine resistance to pyrazinamide (PZA) and specific non-commercial nucleic acid techniques. All this makes it difficult to accurately estimate the proportion of human TB cases caused by M. bovis infection, particularly in developing countries. Distinguishing between the various members of the MTBC is essential for epidemiological investigation of human cases and, to a lesser degree, for adequate chemotherapy of the human TB patient. Zoonotic TB was formerly an endemic disease in the UK population, usually transmitted to man by consumption of raw cows’ milk. Human infection with M. bovis in the UK has been largely controlled through pasteurization of cows’ milk and systematic culling of cattle reacting to compulsory tuberculin tests. Nowadays the majority of the 7000 cases of human TB annually reported in the UK are due to M. tuberculosis acquired directly from an infectious person. In the period 1990–2003, between 17 and 50 new cases of human M. bovis infection were confirmed every year in the UK. This represented between 0.5% and 1.5% of all the culture-confirmed TB cases, a proportion similar to that of other industrialized countries. Most cases of zoonotic TB diagnosed in the UK are attributed to (i) reactivation of long-standing latent infections acquired before widespread adoption of milk pasteurization, or (ii) M. bovis infections contracted abroad. Since 1990, only one case has been documented in the UK of confirmed, indigenous human M. bovis infection recently acquired from an animal source. Therefore, for the overwhelming majority of the population, the risk of contracting M. bovis infection from animals appears to be extremely low. However, bovine TB is once again a major animal health problem in the UK. Given the increasing numbers of cattle herds being affected each year, physicians and other public health professionals must remember that zoonotic TB is not just a disease of the past. A significant risk of M. bovis infection remains in certain segments of the UK population in the form of (i) continuing on-farm consumption of unpasteurized cows’ milk, (ii) retail sales by approved establishments of unpasteurized milk and dairy products and (iii) occupational exposure to infectious aerosols from tuberculous animals and their carcases. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is a chronic illness in animals, especially in cattle, leading to loss in the productivity and signifies a crucial public health risk. Regardless of the zoonotic threat and significant economic costs associated with the disease, precise estimates of bTB prevalence are deficient in many countries, including India, where national control programs are yet to be instigated. The true burden of the disease remains unknown due to lack of routine surveillance data from most of the developing countries. India is progressing well towards attaining the End TB goal, yet bTB continues to remain largely hidden. Moreover, the paucity of literature on bTB in India might lead to undue complacency and hence has to be scrupulously guarded and prevented from gaining any misconceptions in the minds of the common people. Preventing and controlling bTB at the animal interface is pivotal to evade transmission to human, increase food safety and guard the livelihood of the people. To attain this goal, implementation of strategies based on international norms and a multi-sectoral approach will empower enhanced surveillance and diagnosis of disease in animals and subsequently reduce the risk for humans. As an initiative, we step forward to address this review which briefly summarizes the available data in the literature from early 20th century to date to assess the status of bTB in India. We have discussed in detail, the epidemiology, transmission and diagnosis pertaining to bTB. The review also focuses on the interconnection between the health of people and animal, discuss the preventions and control strategies and recommend the use of vaccination in cattle to reduce the spread of infection among other animals and humans. Implementing One Health approach in India, which recognizes the interdependence of the health of people and animals will help the nation in the fight against TB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]