Feng, Jiayin, Li, Zheng, Hao, Yuanfeng, Wang, Jing, Ru, Jingyi, Song, Jian, and Wan, Shiqiang
• Effect of 3-yr litter/understory removal on soil microbial community was studied. • Both litter and understory removal change microbial biomass and community structure. • Litter removal exerts greater effect on bacterial community than understory removal. • Soil NH 4 +-N and moisture regulate bacterial biomass under litter removal. • This work highlights different management practices in climate transitional forests. Litter and understory play important roles in maintaining structure and functions of belowground ecosystems in forests. However, how litter and understory affect soil microbial community is unclear. As part of a three-year (2016–2018) manipulative experiment, this study was designed to evaluate the effects of litter and/or understory removal on soil microbial community in a coniferous-broadleaved mixed forest of the subtropical-warm temperate transition zone in Central China. The results showed that soil moisture, NO 3 −-N, NH 4 +-N, and dissolved organic carbon were decreased under litter removal, but remained unchanged under understory removal. Total, bacteria, and actinomycetes PLFAs were significantly reduced by 11.2%, 16.3%, and 11.0% under litter removal, and by 10.1%, 13.3%, and 12.5% under understory removal, respectively. Both litter and understory removal suppressed network complexity of soil microbial community, but litter removal showed much stronger impacts on the biomass (−14.9 mg kg−1 vs. −10.9 mg kg−1) and composition (−7.77% vs. −2.89%) of bacteria (including gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria) as well as fungi to bacteria ratio than understory removal. Changes of soil NH 4 +-N and moisture might be primarily responsible for the inhibitory effects of litter removal on soil gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial biomass, respectively. Our findings highlight the contrasting responses of soil microbial community to litter and understory removal and would facilitate the mechanistic understanding of these two management practices on belowground ecology in climate transitional forests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]