Search

Decarbonizing global energy systems requires extensive integration of renewable energy into the electric grid. However, the intermittency and variable nature of wind and other non-dispatchable renewable resources make integration a great challenge. Hybridizing renewables with energy storage to form integrated energy systems (IESs) helps mitigate these concerns by improving reliability and resiliency. This paper systematically studies the limitations of the prevailing price-taker assumption for techno-economic analysis (TEA) and optimization of hybrid energy systems. As an illustrative case study, we retrofit an existing wind farm in the RTS-GMLC test system (which loosely mimics the Southwest U.S.) with battery energy storage to form an IES. We show that the standard price-taker model overestimates the electricity revenue and the net present value (NPV) of the IES up to 178% and 50%, respectively, compared to our more rigorous multiscale optimization. These differences arise because introducing storage creates a more flexible resource that impacts the larger wholesale electricity market. Moreover, this work highlights the impact of the IES has on the market via various strategic bidding, and underscores the importance of moving beyond price-taker for optimal storage sizing and TEA of IESs. We conclude by discussing opportunities to generalize the proposed framework to other IESs, and highlight emerging research questions regarding the complex interactions between IESs and markets.

Model-based design of experiments (MBDoE) is a powerful framework for selecting and calibrating science-based mathematical models from data. This work extends popular MBDoE workflows by proposing a convex mixed integer (non)linear programming (MINLP) problem to optimize the selection of measurements. The solver MindtPy is modified to support calculating the D-optimality objective and its gradient via an external package, \texttt{SciPy}, using the grey-box module in Pyomo. The new approach is demonstrated in two case studies: estimating highly correlated kinetics from a batch reactor and estimating transport parameters in a large-scale rotary packed bed for CO$_2$ capture. Both case studies show how examining the Pareto-optimal trade-offs between information content measured by A- and D-optimality versus measurement budget offers practical guidance for selecting measurements for scientific experiments.

The large number of possible structures of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and their limitless potential applications has motivated molecular modelers and researchers to develop methods and models to efficiently assess MOF performance. Some of the techniques include large-scale high-throughput molecular simulations and machine learning models. Despite those advances, the number of possible materials and the potential conditions that could be used still pose a formidable challenge for model development requiring large data sets. Therefore, there is a clear need for algorithms that can efficiently explore the spaces while balancing the number of simulations with prediction accuracy. Here, we present how active learning can sequentially select simulation conditions for gas adsorption, ultimately resulting in accurate adsorption predictions with an order of magnitude less number of simulations. We model adsorption of pure components methane and carbon dioxide in Cu-BTC. We employ Gaussian process regression (GPR) and use the resulting uncertainties in the predictions to guide the next sampling point for molecular simulation. We outline the procedure and demonstrate how this model can emulate adsorption isotherms at 300 K from $10^{-6}$ to 300 bar (methane)/100 bar (carbon dioxide). We also show how this procedure can be used for predicting adsorption on a temperature-pressure phase space for a temperature range of 100 to 300 K, and pressure range of $10^{-6}$ to 300 bar (methane)/100 bar (carbon dioxide)

Accurate force fields are necessary for predictive molecular simulations. However, developing force fields that accurately reproduce experimental properties is challenging. Here, we present a machine learning directed, multiobjective optimization workflow for force field parameterization that evaluates millions of prospective force field parameter sets while requiring only a small fraction of them to be tested with molecular simulations. We demonstrate the generality of the approach and identify multiple low-error parameter sets for two distinct test cases: simulations of hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) vapor-liquid equilibrium (VLE) and an ammonium perchlorate (AP) crystal phase. We discuss the challenges and implications of our force field optimization workflow.

Bayesian hybrid models fuse physics-based insights with machine learning constructs to correct for systematic bias. In this paper, we compare Bayesian hybrid models against physics-based glass-box and Gaussian process black-box surrogate models. We consider ballistic firing as an illustrative case study for a Bayesian decision-making workflow. First, Bayesian calibration is performed to estimate model parameters. We then use the posterior distribution from Bayesian analysis to compute optimal firing conditions to hit a target via a single-stage stochastic program. The case study demonstrates the ability of Bayesian hybrid models to overcome systematic bias from missing physics with less data than the pure machine learning approach. Ultimately, we argue Bayesian hybrid models are an emerging paradigm for data-informed decision-making under parametric and epistemic uncertainty., Comment: Submitted to 2020 American Control Conference