Search

The devastating health, societal, and economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic illuminate potential dangers of unpreparedness for catastrophic pandemic-scale cyber events. While the nature of these threats differs, the responses to COVID-19 illustrate valuable lessons that can guide preparation and response to cyber events. Drawing on the critical role of collaboration and pre-defined roles in pandemic response, we emphasize the need for developing similar doctrine and skill sets for cyber threats. We provide a framework for action by presenting the characteristics of a pandemic-scale cyber event and differentiating it from smaller-scale incidents the world has previously experienced. The framework is focused on the United States. We analyze six critical lessons from COVID-19, outlining key considerations for successful preparedness, acknowledging the limitations of the pandemic metaphor, and offering actionable steps for developing a robust cyber defense playbook. By learning from COVID-19, government agencies, private sector, cybersecurity professionals, academic researchers, and policy makers can build proactive strategies that safeguard critical infrastructure, minimize economic damage, and ensure societal resilience in the face of future cyber events., Comment: 18 pages

Variations of the Flip-It game have been applied to model network cyber operations. While Flip-It can accurately express uncertainty and loss of control, it imposes no essential resource constraints for operations. Capture the flag (CTF) style competitive games, such as Flip-It , entail uncertainties and loss of control, but also impose realistic constraints on resource use. As such, they bear a closer resemblance to actual cyber operations. We formalize a dynamical network control game for CTF competitions and detail the static game for each time step. The static game can be reformulated as instances of a novel optimization problem called Adversarial Knapsack (AK) or Dueling Knapsack (DK) when there are only two players. We define the Adversarial Knapsack optimization problems as a system of interacting Weighted Knapsack problems, and illustrate its applications to general scenarios involving multiple agents with conflicting optimization goals, e.g., cyber operations and CTF games in particular. Common awareness of the scenario, rewards, and costs will set the stage for a non-cooperative game. Critically, rational players may second guess that their AK solution -- with a better response and higher reward -- is possible if opponents predictably play their AK optimal solutions. Thus, secondary reasoning which such as belief modeling of opponents play can be anticipated for rational players and will introduce a type of non-stability where players maneuver for slight reward differentials. To analyze this, we provide the best-response algorithms and simulation software to consider how rational agents may heuristically search for maneuvers. We further summarize insights offered by the game model by predicting that metrics such as Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) may intensify the secondary reasoning in cyber operations., Comment: 26 pages

As organizations increasingly use cloud services to host their IT infrastructure, there is a need to share data among these cloud hosted services and systems. A majority of IT organizations have workloads spread across different cloud service providers, growing their multi-cloud environments. When an organization grows their multi-cloud environment, the threat vectors and vulnerabilities for their cloud systems and services grow as well. The increase in the number of attack vectors creates a challenge of how to prioritize mitigations and countermeasures to best defend a multi-cloud environment against attacks. Utilizing multiple industry standard risk analysis tools, we conducted an analysis of multi-cloud threat vectors enabling calculation and prioritization for the identified mitigations and countermeasures. The prioritizations from the analysis showed that authentication and architecture are the highest risk areas of threat vectors. Armed with this data, IT managers are able to more appropriately budget cybersecurity expenditure to implement the most impactful mitigations and countermeasures.

Industry standard frameworks are now widespread for labeling the high-level stages and granular actions of attacker and defender behavior in cyberspace. While these labels are used for atomic actions, and to some extent for sequences of actions, there remains a need for labeled data from realistic full-scale attacks. This data is valuable for better understanding human actors' decisions, behaviors, and individual attributes. The analysis could lead to more effective attribution and disruption of attackers. We present a methodological approach and exploratory case study for systematically analyzing human behavior during a cyber offense/defense capture-the-flag (CTF) game. We describe the data collection and analysis to derive a metric called keystroke accuracy. After collecting players' commands, we label them using the MITRE ATT&CK framework using a new tool called Pathfinder. We present results from preliminary analysis of participants' keystroke accuracy and its relation to score outcome in CTF games. We describe frequency of action classification within the MITRE ATT&CK framework and discuss some of the mathematical trends suggested by our observations. We conclude with a discussion of extensions for the methodology, including performance evaluation during games and the potential use of this methodology for training artificial intelligence., Comment: 9 pages, accepted to 2023 Workshop on Cyber Security Experimentation and Test (CSET)

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly transformed the healthcare sector, with telehealth services being among the most prominent changes. The adoption of telehealth services, however, has raised new challenges, particularly in the areas of security and privacy. To better comprehend the telehealth needs and concerns of medical professionals, particularly those in private practice, we conducted a study comprised of 20 semi-structured interviews with telehealth practitioners in audiology and speech therapy. Our findings indicate that private telehealth practitioners encounter difficult choices when it comes to balancing security, privacy, usability, and accessibility, particularly while caring for vulnerable populations. Additionally, the study revealed that practitioners face challenges in ensuring HIPAA compliance due to inadequate resources and a lack of technological comprehension. Policymakers and healthcare providers should take proactive measures to address these challenges, including offering resources and training to ensure HIPAA compliance and enhancing technology infrastructure to support secure and accessible telehealth.

Sensitive information is intrinsically tied to interactions in healthcare, and its protection is of paramount importance for achieving high-quality patient outcomes. Research in healthcare privacy and security is predominantly focused on understanding the factors that increase the susceptibility of users to privacy and security breaches. To understand further, we systematically review 26 research papers in this domain to explore the existing user studies in healthcare privacy and security. Following the review, we conducted a card-sorting exercise, allowing us to identify 12 themes integral to this subject such as "Data Sharing," "Risk Awareness," and "Privacy." Further to the identification of these themes, we performed an in-depth analysis of the 26 research papers report on the insights into the discourse within the research community about healthcare privacy and security, particularly from the user perspective.

With the increasing use of multi-cloud environments, security professionals face challenges in configuration, management, and integration due to uneven security capabilities and features among providers. As a result, a fragmented approach toward security has been observed, leading to new attack vectors and potential vulnerabilities. Other research has focused on single-cloud platforms or specific applications of multi-cloud environments. Therefore, there is a need for a holistic security and vulnerability assessment and defense strategy that applies to multi-cloud platforms. We perform a risk and vulnerability analysis to identify attack vectors from software, hardware, and the network, as well as interoperability security issues in multi-cloud environments. Applying the STRIDE and DREAD threat modeling methods, we present an analysis of the ecosystem across six attack vectors: cloud architecture, APIs, authentication, automation, management differences, and cybersecurity legislation. We quantitatively determine and rank the threats in multi-cloud environments and suggest mitigation strategies., Comment: 27 pages, 9 figures

Choice architecture describes the design by which choices are presented to people. Nudges are an aspect intended to make "good" outcomes easy, such as using password meters to encourage strong passwords. Sludge, on the contrary, is friction that raises the transaction cost and is often seen as a negative to users. Turning this concept around, we propose applying sludge for positive cybersecurity outcomes by using it offensively to consume attackers' time and other resources. To date, most cyber defenses have been designed to be optimally strong and effective and prohibit or eliminate attackers as quickly as possible. Our complimentary approach is to also deploy defenses that seek to maximize the consumption of the attackers' time and other resources while causing as little damage as possible to the victim. This is consistent with zero trust and similar mindsets which assume breach. The Sludge Strategy introduces cost-imposing cyber defense by strategically deploying friction for attackers before, during, and after an attack using deception and authentic design features. We present the characteristics of effective sludge, and show a continuum from light to heavy sludge. We describe the quantitative and qualitative costs to attackers and offer practical considerations for deploying sludge in practice. Finally, we examine real-world examples of U.S. government operations to frustrate and impose cost on cyber adversaries.

For two days in February 2018, 17 cybersecurity educators and professionals from government and industry met in a "hackathon" to refine existing draft multiple-choice test items, and to create new ones, for a Cybersecurity Concept Inventory (CCI) and Cybersecurity Curriculum Assessment (CCA) being developed as part of the Cybersecurity Assessment Tools (CATS) Project. We report on the results of the CATS Hackathon, discussing the methods we used to develop test items, highlighting the evolution of a sample test item through this process, and offering suggestions to others who may wish to organize similar hackathons. Each test item embodies a scenario, question stem, and five answer choices. During the Hackathon, participants organized into teams to (1) Generate new scenarios and question stems, (2) Extend CCI items into CCA items, and generate new answer choices for new scenarios and stems, and (3) Review and refine draft CCA test items. The CATS Project provides rigorous evidence-based instruments for assessing and evaluating educational practices; these instruments can help identify pedagogies and content that are effective in teaching cybersecurity. The CCI measures how well students understand basic concepts in cybersecurity---especially adversarial thinking---after a first course in the field. The CCA measures how well students understand core concepts after completing a full cybersecurity curriculum., Comment: Submitted to IEEE Secuirty & Privacy