Search

Balancing selection is the process of selection that preserves various alleles within a population. Studying the areas undergoing balancing selection is essential, because it preserves genetic diversity in a population. Finding genes that exhibit signs of balancing selection during the domestication of cattle is the goal of this study. To identify regions where polymorphism has persisted in the cattle population for millions of years, we examined the genome of cattle. In this study, we used bovine SNP 50 k data to conduct a detailed genome-wide assessment of selection signatures for balancing selection. We have included the genotyped data from 427 animals, including five taurines, two crossbreds, and eight Indian cattle breeds. For this study, we employed Tajima's D approach to identify signature regions undergoing balancing selection. Using the NCBI database, PANTHER 17.0, and CattleQTL database, the annotation was carried out after finding the relevant areas under balancing selection. The number of genomic regions undergoing balancing selection in Ayrshire, Brown-Swiss, Frieswal, Gir, Guernsey, Hariana, Holstein Friesian, Jersey, Kankrej, Nelore, Ongole, Red Sindhi, Sahiwal, Tharparkar, and Vrindavani was 11, 13, 13, 19, 18, 11, 17, 14, 14, 12, 10, 12, 13, 13, and 11, respectively. We have observed multiple immune system-related genes going through balancing selection, including KIT, NFATC2, GBP4, LRRC32, SYT7, RAG1, RAG2, LOC513659, and ZBTB17. In our study, we found that the majority of the immune-related genes and a few genes associated with growth, reproduction, production, and adaptation are undergoing balancing selection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mammalian X and Y chromosomes independently evolved from various autosomes approximately 300 million years ago (MYA). To fully understand the relationship between genomic composition and phenotypic diversity arising due to the course of evolution, we have scanned regions of selection signatures on the X chromosome in different cattle breeds. In this study, we have prepared the datasets of 184 individuals of different cattle breeds and explored the complete X chromosome by utilizing four within-population and two between-population methods. There were 23, 25, 30, 17, 17, and 12 outlier regions identified in Tajima's D, CLR, iHS, ROH, FST, and XP-EHH. Bioinformatics analysis showed that these regions harbor important candidate genes like AKAP4 for reproduction in Brown Swiss, MBTS2 for production traits in Brown Swiss and Guernsey, CXCR3 and CITED1 for health traits in Jersey and Nelore, and BMX and CD40LG for regulation of X chromosome inactivation in Nelore and Gir. We identified genes shared among multiple methods, such as TRNAC-GCA and IL1RAPL1, which appeared in Tajima's D, ROH, and iHS analyses. The gene TRNAW-CCA was found in ROH, CLR and iHS analyses. The X chromosome exhibits a distinctive interaction between demographic factors and genetic variations, and these findings may provide new insight into the X-linked selection in different cattle breeds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A total of 9 SNPs located in TFRC and ACK1 genes of SSC13q41 genomic region were examined for their association with the adhesion pattern of native Indian pigs using local isolate of diarrhoeagenic E. coli. Phenotypic evaluation of adhesion pattern of 150 pigs revealed 116 animals positive for adhesion, whereas 34 animals had non-adhesive phenotype. Among the adhesive animals, 6, 87 and 23 pigs were strongly adhesive, weakly adhesive and adhesive, respectively. PCR–RFLP study revealed 8 polymorphic SNPs with low to moderate PIC ranging from 7.39 to 37.25% and low to high heterozygosities (8–70%). The loci g.291 C > T, rs81218930 C > T, rs318751568 C > T of TFRC and g.93222 C > A g.94600 C > T of ACK1 showed significant departure from HWE. The genotypic frequencies of the SNPs as well as the haplotypes did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) across the adhesion patterns except one SNP (ACK1-g.107371 A > C). Among the g.107371 A > C genotypes observed, CA was associated with non-adhesive phenotype. Furthermore, TFRC mRNA expression levels were found to be significantly (P < 0.05) different among various adhesive phenotypes, whereas that of ACK1 was significantly (P < 0.05) different between non-adhesive and adhesive groups. The significant association of SNP (ACK1-g.107371 A > C), which was also previously reported to influence ETECF4 mediated diarrhoea susceptibility, implicates its wider application in genetic control of piglet diarrhoea. Furthermore, the up-regulation of TFRC gene expression in adhesive group supports its proposed role in activation of immune cells against E. coli and intracellular iron transport. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]