Search

Giant fibrovascular polyps of the esophagus are rare, benign mesenchymal intraluminal lesions that arise from the cervical esophagus and can reach a very large size. Surgical excision is the treatment of choice, since endoscopic removal alone is not always feasible due to the presence of a very much vascularized stalk in most cases. We present two archetypal cases emphasizing the fact that these lesions can grow to huge masses with various and bizarre clinical presentation and they can arise (although rarely) at the level of the hypopharynx. We also aim to point out the role of imaging in defining the exact origin and characteristics of the stalk (width, vascularization) and the polyp structure (tissue components), thus providing useful information for planning the most appropriate surgical approach.

To evaluate patients’ preferences regarding follow-up of medium size polyps detected at screening CT colonography (CTC). 193 C-RADS2 asymptomatic patients were asked to fill in a form explaining the indications, technique and potential complications of CTC, and were invited to choose their preferred examination technique (CTC or optical colonoscopy: OC) and their follow-up interval by repeated consultations at 3-month intervals. The follow-up interval for CTC and OC was recorded. 87/193 C-RADS2 patients (45.1%) accepted follow-up. Average time interval for follow-up was comparable between CTC and OC (9.00 ± 4.24 vs. 9.00 ± 4.39 months, respectively; P = 0.7188). No patients chose to undergo a 3-year follow-up with either CTC or OC. Most patients elected to have follow-up with either CTC or OC before 18 months rather than later (P = 0.0004). A substantial fraction of C-RADS2 patients prefer to undergo immediate OC and polyp removal rather than follow-up, and the majority of those accepting follow-up are willing to wait for less than 18 months. Such findings may suggest a revision of the proposed C-RADS2 category.

To evaluate the role of CT colonography (CTC) in the follow-up of patients having received partial colectomy for colorectal cancer. CTC was performed in 72 subjects with history of partial colectomy for colorectal cancer. Colectomy had been performed in the right colon (n = 18), descending colon (n = 15), sigmoid colon (n = 21), and rectum (n = 18). Patients underwent CTC following incomplete conventional colonoscopy due to intolerance to endoscope insertion or luminal stenosis. In 70 cases pneumocolon was obtained through a rectal tube, and in 2 cases through a cutaneous anastomosis. CTC datasets were analyzed in combined 2D and 3D mode. All patients in whom CTC was suggestive for or raised the suspicion of disease recurrence underwent colonoscopy in sedation for confirmation of CTC findings. CTC detected 7 cases of anastomotic stenosis. In 6/7 patients the stenosis was located in the sigmoid colon and in 1/7 patients at the level of the ileo-colic junction in the transverse colon. Out of these cases, four were fibrotic and three were neoplastic stenoses. In none of these cases was the CT appearance of the stenoses specific for disease recurrence, and conventional colonoscopy together with biopsy was necessary in order to characterize such findings. However, sensitivity of CTC in detecting anastomotic stenosis was 100% (7/7). One colonic mass (5 cm largest diameter) was detected in one case at the level of the proximal transverse colon in a patient with left colectomy performed 2 years before. The study of the residual colon showed 3 polyps in three patients (8, 6, and 5 mm, respectively). All CT findings were confirmed and characterized by conventional colonoscopy. In all cases the residual colon was entirely visualized by CTC with a completion rate of 100%. CTC is a feasible and minimally invasive method for full exploration of the colon after surgical resection allowing detection of cancer recurrence, metachronous disease, and distant metastases in one single study, and represents a valid alternative to conventional colonoscopy in this patient population.

To assess Crohn’s disease (CD) activity through analysis of time–signal intensity curves and quantitative contrast-enhancement parameters on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. 70 patients (male:female = 44:26, age 15–45 years, mean 27.8 years) with biopsy-proven clinically active or inactive CD, underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI after oral administration of iso-osmotic solution. Time–signal intensity curves were classified according to their shape as type I (early upslope with late plateau) and type II (slow contrast material wash-in with late wash-out). Curve parameters such as maximum enhancement (ME), the ratio between late and ME (LE/ME), and UpSlope (US) were compared between patients with active and inactive CD (two-tailed Mann–Whitney test). Sensitivity, specificity, and cut-off for each parameter were calculated by means of receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. 53/53 patients with active CD and 17/17 with inactive CD showed type I and type II curves, respectively. ME, LE/ME, and US were significantly higher in active than in inactive CD. ME, LE/ME, and US had sensitivity and specificity of 100%:100%:100% and 100%:83%:100% with cut-offs of 135.5:0.8909:2, respectively. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of time–signal intensity curves obtained with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI allow reliable noninvasive differentiation between active and inactive CD.