Search

Objective: Acute visual impairment is the most feared complication of giant cell arteritis (GCA) but is challenging to predict. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluates orbital pathology not visualized by an ophthalmologic examination. This study combined orbital and cranial vessel wall MRI to assess both orbital and cranial disease activity in patients with GCA, including patients without visual symptoms., Methods: Patients with suspected active GCA who underwent orbital and cranial vessel wall MRI were included. In 14 patients, repeat imaging over 12 months assessed sensitivity to change. Clinical diagnosis of ocular or nonocular GCA was determined by a rheumatologist and/or ophthalmologist. A radiologist masked to clinical data scored MRI enhancement of structures., Results: Sixty-four patients with suspected GCA were included: 25 (39%) received a clinical diagnosis of GCA, including 12 (19%) with ocular GCA. Orbital MRI enhancement was observed in 83% of patients with ocular GCA, 38% of patients with nonocular GCA, and 5% of patients with non-GCA. MRI had strong diagnostic performance for both any GCA and ocular GCA. Combining MRI with a funduscopic examination reached 100% sensitivity for ocular GCA. MRI enhancement significantly decreased after treatment (P < 0.01)., Conclusion: In GCA, MRI is a sensitive tool that comprehensively evaluates multiple cranial structures, including the orbits, which are the most concerning site of pathology. Orbital enhancement in patients without visual symptoms suggests that MRI may detect at-risk subclinical ocular disease in GCA. MRI scores decreased following treatment, suggesting scores reflect inflammation. Future studies are needed to determine if MRI can identify patients at low risk for blindness who may receive less glucocorticoid therapy., (© 2024 The Authors. ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)

Objective: The optimal management of patients with incidentally found clinically isolated aortitis (CIA) after aneurysm repair is unclear. This study compared long-term surgical and clinical outcomes after surgical repair of thoracic aortic aneurysm between patients with CIA and patients with noninflammatory etiologies., Methods: This is a matched cohort study. Patients with CIA were identified by histopathology following open thoracic aortic aneurysm repair. Two comparators without inflammation on pathology were matched to each patient by year of surgical repair. Outcomes included surgical complications, new vascular abnormalities on imaging, and death., Results: One hundred sixty-two patients were included: 53 with CIA and 109 matched comparators. Median follow-up time was similar between groups (CIA 3.7 vs. comparator 3.3 years, P = 0.64). There was no difference in postoperative complications, surgical revision, or death between groups. Only 32% of patients with CIA saw a rheumatologist in the outpatient setting and 33% received immunosuppressive treatment. On surveillance imaging, no difference was seen in new or worsening aortic aneurysms, but there were significantly more vascular abnormalities in branch arteries of the thoracic aorta in patients with CIA (39% vs. 11%, P < 0.01)., Conclusion: Among patients who underwent surgical repair of a thoracic aortic aneurysm, patients with CIA were more likely than noninflammatory comparators to develop radiographic abnormalities in aortic branch arteries. Notably, there was no difference in risk of new aortic aneurysms or surgical complications despite most patients with CIA never receiving immunosuppression. This suggests that more selective initiation of immunosuppression in CIA may be considered after aortic aneurysm repair., (© 2022 The Authors. ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)