Search

Non-native Pacific oyster Magallana gigas (Thunberg, 1793) was introduced to the Mediter-ranean Sea for aquaculture purposes in the 1960s. Although this species was not introduced for aquaculture to the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea, in the 1970s, it was reported in the Lim Bay, in the North-eastern Adriatic. Until recently, there has been no research on the species in the Croatian part of the Adriatic. The aim of this research was to summarize existing and novel data on the distribution of M. gigas in coastal areas of the Eastern Adriatic and to provide a baseline for the future monitoring and assessment programmes of the species. Distribution of M. gigas was determined by three different methods: (i) a visual census of the presence of M. gigas specimens in the medio-littoral zone; (ii) DNA identification of M. gigas larvae in the water column; and (iii) the presence of M. gigas in the subtidal zone at depth between 25 and 40 m. Magallana gigas has a well-established population in the medio-littoral zone of natural and anthropogenic habitats along the coast of the North-eastern Adriatic Sea (west coast of Istria peninsula), but it is not present in the deeper layers . In the Central-eastern and South-eastern Adriatic Sea, the species was either absent or sporadically recorded with no evidence of fully established populations. Considering the great invasion success of M. gigas worldwide and effects that this species could have on the invaded ecosystem (e.g. competition for food and space with native species), detailed future monitoring is needed for the Eastern Adriatic Sea.

Due to very good collaboration with one commercial purse seiner, using “Srdelara” and operating in fishing zone G, preliminary data concerning the interaction between small pelagic purse seine fishery and its predators were obtained. According to the notes taken by experience observer on-board in period from year 2013 to 2016, seems that tunas, dolphins and swordfish were the faithful companions of purse seiner fisherman with abundance of 68.6%, 22.0% and 9.4%, respectively. Although they were present all year round, their monthly pattern of appearance indicated that less tunas were recorded in May-June, more dolphins were noted from July to October while swordfish were mostly abundant in winter (January-March). Within the investigated period, slightly increasing trend of tuna and dolphins’ appearance was recorded, although statistically not significant. Analysing possible correlation between purse seine catches and predator’s abundances, revealed that appearance of tuna had negative impact on the catches (dispersion of schools), while realised catches in presence of dolphins were quite good so it seems that they tend to round up small pelagic fish schools., Zahvaljujući vrlo dobroj suradnji s ribarskim sektorom, točnije jednom komercijalnom plivaricom koja koristi plivaricu “Srdelaru” u ribolovnoj zoni G, su prikupljeni preliminarni podaci vezani uz interakciju ovog tipa ribolova i njegovih predatora. U razdoblju od 2013. do 2016. godine, prema podacima prikupljenim od strane iskusnog promatrača na palubi ove komercijalne plivarice, je utvrđeno da su tune, dupini i igluni najvjerniji pratioci ovog tipa ribolova te da je njihova abundancija redom bila 68,6%, 22,0% i 9,4%. Premda je uočeno da su navedeni grabežljivci prisutni tijekom cijele godine ipak je njihova pojavnost kolebala od mjeseca do mjeseca – najmanje tuna je zabilježeno u razdoblju od svibnja do lipnja, nešto više dupina je uočeno od srpnja do listopada, dok su igluni bili najbrojniji od siječnja do ožujka. Tijekom istraživanog razdoblja je utvrđeno blago povećanje broja tuna i dupina premda to povećanje nije bilo statistički značajno. Korelirajući ulove ostvarene istraživanom komercijalnom plivaricom i broja uočenih grabežljivaca, čini se da će u slučaju pojave tune ostvareni ulov biti manji s obzirom da ona rasprši ciljanu plovu sitne plave ribe, dok će relatvno dobar ulov ista plivarica ostvariti u prisutnosti dupina koji će uočenu plovu još više zbiti.

Acoustic surveys in the Adriatic Sea have been performed annually by the research vessels “Dallaporta” and “Bios”, equipped with SIMRAD echo-sounders (EK-500 and EK-60), and working with 38 kHz split-beam transducer (ES38B). Since the vessels have different characteristics and use different pelagic trawls for fish sampling, there is uncertainty regarding the comparability of the results obtained. In order to evaluate comparability of the results, a comparison between research vessels was performed. That included comparisons of vessels’ noise, acoustic data collection, and fish samples composition and size structure analyses. The noise generated by both vessels was sufficiently low to allow a single fish detection up to 200 m depth. Acoustic data collected by the two vessels showed similar trends, no significant differences in average SA-values, and highly significant correlation between SA-values. Therefore, unbiased acoustic data collected by vessels could be combined in future stock assessments. Concerning collection of fish samples, anchovy resulted as the most abundant species in the samples collected by both vessels even if size compositions of anchovy were significantly different., Eho-monitoring u jadranskome moru provodi se jednom godišnje korištenjem istraživačkih brodova “Dallaporta” i “bios”, opremljenih s ehosonderima SIMraD (ek-500 i ek-60), te pretvaračima podijeljenog snopa radnih frekvencija od 38 kHz (eS38b). Budući da ovi straživački brodovi imaju različite značajke, a koriste i različite pelagijske koće za uzorkovanje sitne plave ribe, postoje sumnje glede usporedivosti prikupljenih podataka. S ciljem procjene usporedivosti prikupljenih podataka, napravljena je usporedba u prikupljanju podataka ovim istraživačkim brodovima. Uspoređena je buka pojedinih brodova, prikupljanje akustičkih podataka, te usporedbe prikupljenih uzoraka riba s obzirom na sastav i strukturu uzoraka. utvrđeno je da buka koju proizvode oba broda je dovoljno niska da dozvoljava detekciju pojedinačnih riba do dubine od 200 m. Akustički podaci prikupljeni dvama istraživačim brodovima pokazuju slične trendove, bez značajnih razlika u srednjim Sa-vrijednostima i s vrlo značajnom povezanošću među njima. Potvrđeno je da se budućim procjenama ribljih naselja nepristrani akustički podaci ovih brodova mogu međusobno nadopunjavati. Glede prikupljanja uzoraka riba, došlo se do spoznaje da je inćun bio najzastupljenija vrsta u uzorcima koje su sakupila oba istraživačka broda iako je njihova veličinska struktura bila značajno različita.