1. Fully kinetic study of facility pressure effects on RF-source magnetic nozzles.
- Author
-
Andriulli, Raoul, Andrews, Shaun, Souhair, Nabil, Magarotto, Mirko, and Ponti, Fabrizio
- Subjects
- *
NOZZLES , *ION scattering , *ELECTRON temperature , *COLLISIONS (Nuclear physics) , *INELASTIC collisions , *HIGH-frequency discharges , *RADIO frequency , *PLUMES (Fluid dynamics) - Abstract
A fully kinetic 2D axisymmetric Particle-in-Cell (PIC) model is used to examine the effects of background facility pressure on the plasma transport and propulsive efficiency of magnetic nozzles. Simulations are performed for a low-power (150 W class) cathode-less radio-frequency (RF) plasma thruster, operating with xenon, between background pressures up to 1 0 − 2 Pa and average electron discharge temperatures of 4–16 eV. When the electron temperature within the near-plume region reaches 8 eV, a decisive reduction in performance occurs: at 1 0 − 2 Pa, in-plume power losses surpass 25% of the discharge energy flux. Given that the ionisation energy for Xe is 12 eV, the 8 eV threshold indicates that a consistent percentage of electrons has energy enough to trigger ionisation. On the other hand, when the temperature is below such threshold, the primary collisions are charge-exchange and inelastic ion scattering, and the power loss remains less than 10%. It is established that losses in the considered thruster are significant if the facility pressure is greater than 1 0 − 3 Pa, at absorbed powers larger than 130 W. At the nominal 150 W, this results in a 15% thrust reduction. When facility pressure is taken into consideration over ideal vacuum simulations, numerical error is reduced to < 30% when compared to experimental thrust measurements at 1 0 − 3 Pa. • Investigation of facility effects on cathode-less RF thruster performance. • Particle-in-Cell (PIC) simulation of magnetic nozzle expansion into background gas. • Up to 15% thrust reduction at 150 W beyond 1 0 − 3 Pa. • Electron inelastic collisions can cause up to 70% of total in-plume power losses. • Experimental results/setup should therefore take into account facility pressure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF