Search

Background: Controversy remains regarding the appropriate screening for intracranial aneurysms or for the treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) for patients without known high-risk factors for rupture. This study aimed to assess how sex affects both aSAH presentation and outcomes for aSAH treatment. Method: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients treated at a single institution for an aSAH during a 12-year period (August 1, 2007–July 31, 2019). An analysis of women with and without high-risk factors was performed, including a propensity adjustment for a poor neurologic outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score > 2) at follow-up. Results: Data from 1014 patients were analyzed (69% [n = 703] women). Women were significantly older than men (mean ± SD, 56.6 ± 14.1 years vs 53.4 ± 14.2 years, p < 0.001). A significantly lower percentage of women than men had a history of tobacco use (36.6% [n = 257] vs 46% [n = 143], p = 0.005). A significantly higher percentage of women than men had no high-risk factors for aSAH (10% [n = 70] vs 5% [n = 16], p = 0.01). The percentage of women with an mRS score > 2 at the last follow-up was significantly lower among those without high-risk factors (34%, 24/70) versus those with high-risk factors (53%, 334/633) (p = 0.004). Subsequent propensity-adjusted analysis (adjusted for age, Hunt and Hess grade, and Fisher grade) found no statistically significant difference in the odds of a poor outcome for women with or without high-risk factors for aSAH (OR = 0.7, 95% CI = 0.4–1.2, p = 0.18). Conclusions: A higher percentage of women versus men with aSAH had no known high-risk factors for rupture, supporting more aggressive screening and management of women with unruptured aneurysms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Withholding prophylactic anticoagulation from patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) before external ventricular drain (EVD) removal or replacement remains controversial. This study analyzed whether prophylactic anticoagulation was associated with hemorrhagic complications related to EVD removal. Method: All aSAH patients treated from January 1, 2014, to July 31, 2019, with an EVD placed were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were compared based on the number of prophylactic anticoagulant doses withheld for EVD removal (> 1 vs. ≤ 1). The primary outcome analyzed was deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) after EVD removal. A propensity-adjusted logistic-regression analysis was performed for confounding variables. Results: A total of 271 patients were analyzed. For EVD removal, > 1 dose was withheld from 116 (42.8%) patients. Six (2.2%) patients had a hemorrhage associated with EVD removal, and 17 (6.3%) patients had a DVT or PE. No significant difference in EVD-related hemorrhage after EVD removal was found between patients with > 1 versus ≤ 1 dose of anticoagulant withheld (4 of 116 [3.5%] vs. 2 of 155 [1.3%]; p = 0.41) or between those with no doses withheld compared to ≥ 1 dose withheld (1 of 100 [1.0%] vs. 5 of 171 [2.9%]; p = 0.32). After adjustment, withholding > 1 dose of anticoagulant versus ≤ 1 dose was associated with the occurrence of DVT or PE (OR 4.8; 95% CI, 1.5–15.7; p = 0.009). Conclusions: In aSAH patients with EVDs, withholding > 1 dose of prophylactic anticoagulant for EVD removal was associated with an increased risk of DVT or PE and no reduction in catheter removal–associated hemorrhage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Treatment of small ruptured aneurysms (SRAs) remains controversial, with literature reporting difficulty with endovascular versus microsurgical approaches. This paper analyzes outcomes after endovascular coiling and microsurgical clipping among patients with SRAs prospectively enrolled in the Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial (BRAT). Method: All BRAT patients were included in this study. Patient demographics, aneurysm size, aneurysm characteristics, procedure-related complications, and outcomes at discharge and at 1-year and 6-year follow-up were evaluated. A modified Rankin scale (mRS) score > 2 was considered a poor outcome. Results: Of 73 patients with SRAs, 40 were initially randomly assigned to endovascular coiling and 33 to microsurgical clipping. The rate of treatment crossover was significantly different between coiling and clipping; 25 patients who were assigned to coiling crossed over to clipping, and no clipping patients crossed over to coiling (P < 0.001). Among SRA patients, 15 underwent coiling and 58 underwent clipping; groups did not differ significantly in demographic characteristics or aneurysm type (P ≥ 0.11). Mean aneurysm diameter was significantly greater in the endovascular group (3.0 ± 0.3 vs 2.6 ± 0.6; P = 0.02). The incidence of procedure-related complications was similar for endovascular and microsurgical treatments (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.0 [0.1–10.0], P = 0.98). Both groups had comparable overall outcome (mRS score > 2) at discharge and 1-year and 6-year follow-up (P = 0.48 and 0.73, respectively). Conclusions: Most SRA patients in the BRAT underwent surgical clipping, with a high rate of crossover from endovascular approaches. Endovascular treatment was equivalent to surgical clipping with regard to procedure-related complications and neurologic outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]