Search

Background: By now it has been well established that vertebral artery injury (VAI) is associated with unstable cervical spine injuries resulting from blunt trauma. A more complete understanding of predisposing factors and the mechanism of injury in VAI should result in improved outcomes and reduced risk for patients with VAI associated with unstable cervical spine injury following blunt trauma. The authors report statistical outcome and hypothesis to more thoroughly examine the predisposing factors for VAI, of which management is controversial, in destabilized midcervical spine trauma. Methods: Ninety-one of 131 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for a traumatically destabilized subaxial cervical spine were included, and results were analyzed statistically by logistic regression. Results: Eighteen patients (19.8 % of 91 patients) had a VAI associated with midcervical spine trauma (C2-C6). In univariate statistical analysis, transverse foramen fracture ( P = 0.002), facet dislocation ( P = 0.014), and facet fracture ( P = 0.001) were significant risk factors. However, only facet fracture was determined to be significant risk factor after multivariate analysis ( P = 0.006, odds ratio 20.98). It is hypothesized that a VAI occurs in a midcervical spine injury when a facet fracture allows the bony compartment to impinge on the relatively narrow free space of the intervertebral foramen, which is also occupied by the cervical root. Conclusion: A facet fracture is the most important risk factor for VAI in patients with a destabilized midcervical spine injury. Patients with a C2-C6 facet fracture may require a definitive evaluation with vertebral artery imaging. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Microvascular decompression (MVD) for hemifacial spasm (HFS) is regarded as the gold-standard treatment due to its efficacy and durability. However, some patients still suffer from delayed recurrence after initially successful MVD.In this study, we describe our clinical experience in a single institute following up initially successful MVD for HFS 5 or more years after surgery. We analyzed the probability of, risk/predisposing factors for, and timing of delayed recurrence. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 587 patients meeting our inclusion criteria who underwent MVD for HFS from March, 1999, to June, 2006. We evaluated the time-dependent probability of recurrence and factors affecting delayed recurrence and time of recurrence. Results: The probability of delayed recurrence was 1.0, 1.7, and 2.9 % at 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years after surgery, respectively. Mean time to recurrence was 153.1 months (95 % confidence interval [151.4-154.9]). The probability of late recurrence was increased in patients with co-morbid arterial hypertension ( p = 0.036). However, there was a trend towards an association of delayed recurrence with co-existence of young age, male gender, vein or VA offender, and experience of transient facial weakness. Conclusions: Delayed recurrence of HFS after initially successful MVD is rare; however, there are patients who experience delayed recurrence more than 2 years after MVD, even until 5 years after MVD. Our results suggest that arterial hypertension contributes to late recurrence. We did not find a statistically significant relationship between recurrence and other putative risk/predisposing factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]