Search

Background: The socioeconomic differences in survival are pronounced for patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer; disease stage at diagnosis is suggested to be a main driver of this association. This nationwide, population-based study investigates socioeconomic differences in the pre-diagnostic interval and disease stage at diagnosis., Material and Methods: Information on patient-reported symptoms, symptom onset and disease-specific factors was obtained from the nationwide population-based Danish Head and Neck Cancer Group (DAHANCA) database for patients diagnosed with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma between 2008 and 2019 in Denmark. Socioeconomic position (SEP) was measured by individual-level education, income and cohabitation status obtained from administrative registers. Socioeconomic differences in the interval from symptom onset to diagnosis were investigated in general linear models with 95% confidence intervals (CIs); overall and by subsite, symptom and comorbidity score. Consultation patterns prior to diagnosis were examined using methods for change-point detection. Associations with advanced-stage disease were estimated in logistic regression models., Results: Patients with low, medium and high SEP had a similar interval from patient-reported symptom onset to diagnosis of 10 weeks. Although this interval varied according to primary symptom and anatomical subsite, no apparent socioeconomic differences were observed within these subgroups. Aligned with the patient-reported symptom onset, a distinct increase in consultation rates was observed at 9 weeks (95% CI [7.3; 10.7]) for patients with low SEP and 7 weeks (95% CI [4.8; 9.2]) for patients with high SEP, with overlapping CIs. Patients with low compared to high SEP had increased odds for advanced-stage glottic and oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. For the remaining subsites the association varied according to SEP-indicator and TNM-edition., Conclusion: The interval from symptom onset to diagnosis and consultation patterns were similar across SEP groups. Still, socioeconomic differences in stage at diagnosis were observed for some - but not all - subsites.

Introduction: The prognosis after primary (chemo-)radiotherapy for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is affected by Human Papillomavirus (HPV) status, with a better prognosis in HPV-positive OPSCC. HPV-status is routinely assessed by p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC), but additional HPV DNA testing is debated. Also, there are numerous HPV genotypes, which prognostic role may need clarification. The purpose of this study was: (1) to test a custom-made targeted HPV next generation sequencing (NGS) panel in OPSCC, (2) to determine correlation with p16 IHC, and (3) to assess the impact of HPV DNA testing on outcome in the prospectively randomized clinical trial DAHANCA 19., Materials and Methods: We included 271 patients with OPSCC treated with primary (chemo-)radiotherapy in the DAHANCA 19 trial. Of these, 199 (73%) were p16-positive. HPV-status was determined by targeted HPV next generation sequencing (NGS), using a custom-made HPV genotyping panel., Results: HPV was detected in 194 tumor samples. p16 IHC and NGS HPV status were concordant in 265 (98%) of 271 patients, whereas we did not detect HPV DNA in 5 p16-positive tumors. HPV16 accounted for 169 of 194 HPV-positive cases (87%). HPV genotypes 18, 31, 33, 35, and 59 were also detected.Loco-regional failure and overall survival were similar whether patients were separated by p16 IHC, or HPV DNA status ( p  < 0.0001 for all) and did not depend on HPV genotype ( p  = 0.9 and p  = 0.7)., Conclusion: In the present study, HPV DNA testing or typing in a Danish OPSCC cohort did not add additional information to p16 IHC, the most widely used and accepted prognostic indicator.

Background: In head and neck cancer, distant metastases may be present at diagnosis (M1) or occur after treatment (DM). It is unknown whether M1 and DM follow the same clinical development and share prognosis, as population-based studies regarding outcomes are scarce. Therefore, we investigated the incidence, location of metastases and overall survival of patients with M1 and DM., Materials and Methods: Patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the pharynx and larynx in Denmark 2008-2017 were identified in the Danish Head and Neck Cancer Group (DAHANCA) database. We identified 7300 patients, of whom 197 (3%) had M1 and 498 (8%) developed DM during follow-up., Results: The 5-year cumulative incidence of DM was 8%. 1- and 2-year overall survival for DM (27% and 13%) vs. M1 (28% and 9%) were equally poor. There was no significant difference in location of metastases for M1 and DM and the most frequently involved organs were lungs, bone, lymph nodes and liver, in descending order. In oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas, the location of metastases did not differ by p16-status. For p16-positive patients, 21% of DM occurred later than three years of follow-up compared to 7% of p16-negative patients., Conclusion: Incidence, location of metastases and prognosis of primary metastatic (M1) or post-treatment metastatic (DM) disease in pharyngeal and laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma are similar in this register-based study.

Background: Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) are rising rapidly in incidence due to Human Papillomavirus (HPV) and/or tobacco smoking. Prognosis is better for patients with HPV-positive disease, but may also be influenced by tobacco smoking and other factors. There is a need to individualize treatment to minimize morbidity and improve prognosis. Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) is an emerging pre-clinical research model that may more accurately reflect the human disease, and is an attractive platform to study disease biology and develop treatments and biomarkers. In this study we describe the establishment of PDX models, compare PDX tumors to the human original, and assess the suitability of this model for radiotherapy research and biomarker development. Material and methods: Tumor biopsies from 34 patients with previously untreated OPSCC were implanted in immunodeficient mice, giving rise to 12 squamous cell carcinoma PDX models (7 HPV+, 5 HPV-). Primary and PDX tumors were characterized extensively, examining histology, immunohistochemistry, cancer gene sequencing and gene expression analysis. Radiosensitivity was assessed in vivo in a growth delay assay. Results: Established PDX models maintained histological and immunohistochemical characteristics as well as HPV-status of the primary tumor. Important cancer driver gene mutations, e.g., in TP53 , PIK3CA and others, were preserved. Gene expression related to cancer stem cell markers and gene expression subtype were preserved, while gene expression related to hypoxia and immune response differed. Radiosensitivity studies showed high concordance with clinical observations. Conclusion: PDX from OPSCC preserves important molecular characteristics of the human primary tumor. Radiosensitivity were in accordance with clinically observed treatment response. The PDX model is a clinically relevant surrogate model of head and neck cancer. Perspectives include increased understanding of disease biology, which could lead to development of novel treatments and biomarkers.

Background: Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and a low level of hemoglobin often have a poor response to radiation that may be related to hypoxia-induced radioresistance. We have previously published the importance of hemoglobin level and the effect of transfusion by the results from the randomized DAHANCA 5 trial, including 414 patients in the analysis. Aim of the current analysis was to gain additional power by adding patients from the continued subrandomization in the DAHANCA 7 trial, now including a total of almost 1200 patients., Material and Methods: Patients were randomized to treatment in the DAHANCA 5 and 7 study (nimorazole vs. placebo and five fx/week vs. six fx/week), and in addition, patients with "low" pre-irradiation hemoglobin values (females <13 g/dl; males <14.5 g/dl) were subrandomized to plus or minus transfusion. Transfusion was given with packed red blood cells with the aim to achieve a hemoglobin level in the "high" value range., Results: A total of 1166 patients were included, 701 patients had high hemoglobin levels and 465 had low hemoglobin levels. Among the low hemoglobin patients, 235 were randomized to receive transfusion. Patient characteristics and treatment arms were well balanced. In the majority of patients, transfusion resulted in increased hemoglobin levels although this decreased slightly throughout treatment as in the non-transfused patients. Overall, the patients with low hemoglobin level had a significant reduced probability of locoregional control, disease-specific and overall survival. In the low hemoglobin group, transfusion did not improve the outcome in locoregional control, disease-specific or overall survival. In multivariate analyses, HPV/p16 status, T and N classification were significant factors for all outcome measures, whereas there was no significant influence of transfusion or hemoglobin level on endpoints., Conclusion: Transfusion prior to and during radiation treatment did not improve the outcome in patients with HNSCC and low hemoglobin values, but may have a negative impact on survival.