1. A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing nepafenac, intravitreal triamcinolone and no adjuvant therapy for epiretinal membrane.
- Author
-
Mandelcorn ED, Al-Falah M, Zhao LD, Kertes P, Devenyi R, and Lam WC
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal administration & dosage, Epiretinal Membrane diagnosis, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glucocorticoids administration & dosage, Humans, Intravitreal Injections, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Benzeneacetamides administration & dosage, Epiretinal Membrane drug therapy, Phenylacetates administration & dosage, Retina diagnostic imaging, Tomography, Optical Coherence methods, Triamcinolone Acetonide administration & dosage, Visual Acuity
- Abstract
Purpose: To compare the efficacy of topical nepafenac 0.1% versus intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) at the conclusion of vitrectomy surgery versus no adjuvant therapy (NAT) in improving macular morphology post-operatively in patients undergoing vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane (ERM), as measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA)., Methods: Design: Prospective randomized clinical trial Setting: Multi-centre 80 patients scheduled to undergo vitrectomy surgery for idiopathic ERM were randomized to receive either IVTA (4 mg/0.1 cc) at the end of surgery, topical nepafenac sodium 0.1% TID for 1 month post-operation or no adjuvant treatment (NAT). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging, best-corrected visual acuity and intraocular pressure (IOP) were measured before surgery, and 1 and 2 months post-operation., Results: Although all three groups showed reduction in macular thickness post-operation, the NAT group showed the most improvement, with a reduction of 136.18 ± 29.84 μm at two months. There was no statistically significant difference in macular thickness between the groups at each time point, p = 0.158. The NAT group also had the best recovery in BCVA with an improvement of 0.207 logMAR (10.35 letters) at two months post-operation. There was no statistically significant difference in BCVA between the groups, p = 0.606. There was statistically significant difference in the IOP between the three groups, p = 0.04 only at 1-month visit. The IVTA group had the highest rise in average IOP at both 1 and 2 months post-operation (2.72 and 1.58 mmHg, respectively)., Conclusion: Our study data suggest there was no advantage in the use of topical nepafenac or IVTA for post-vitrectomy ERM surgery., (© 2021 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF