Search

Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of a new oral rehydration solution (ORS) with improved flavour in the management of children with acute gastroenteritis (AGE). Methods: Children 4 to 48 months of age with AGE (≥3 loose or watery stools per day for >1 but <5 days) with mild-to-moderate dehydration (3% to 9% loss of body weight) according to the World Health Organization criteria randomly received regular hypotonic ORS (Na 60 mmol/L, glucose 78 mmol/L) or the same hypotonic ORS with an apple taste. Results: Of the 147 children randomized, 130 (88.4%) were available for intention-to-treat analysis. The proportion of children with the resolution of signs of dehydration in the experimental group compared with the control group was similar at 24 h (49/63 vs. 57/67, respectively, p = 0.28). There were also no significant differences in adequate weight gain (p = 0.48) and urine production at 24 h (p = 0.95) between groups. There were no differences between groups in any of the secondary outcome measures, including ORS intake. No adverse events were observed in the study groups. Conclusions: In an outpatient setting, there was no difference in efficacy between the study products. Both ORSs were equally effective and may be used interchangeably. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim : To evaluate the clinical and laboratory predictors of death in hospitalized under-five children with diarrhoea. Methods : This is a prospective cohort study carried out in the Special Care Ward (SCW) of the Dhaka Hospital of the International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (ICDDR,B), Dhaka, Bangladesh. All admitted diarrhoeal children of both sexes, aged 0-59 months, from September 2007 through December 2007 were enrolled. We compared and analysed factors among diarrhoeal children who died (n = 29) with those who survived (n = 229). Results : In logistic regression analysis, after adjusting for potential confounders (infusion of intravenous fluid and immature PMN), absent peripheral pulse even after complete rehydration (OR 10.9, 95% CI 2.1-56.8; p < 0.01), severe malnutrition (OR 7.9, 95% CI 1.8-34.8; p < 0.01), hypoxaemia (OR 8.5, 95% CI 1.0-75.0; p = 0.05), radiological lobar pneumonia (OR 17.8, 95% CI 3.7-84.5; p < 0.01) and hypernatraemia (OR 15.8, 95% CI 3.0-81.8; p < 0.01) were independently associated with deaths among diarrhoeal children admitted to SCW. Conclusions: Thus, the absence of peripheral pulses even after full rehydration, severe malnutrition, hypoxaemia, lobar pneumonia and hypernatraemia are independent predictors of death among the under-five children with diarrhoea admitted to critical care ward of a resource-limited setting in Bangladesh. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Discusses the treatment protocol for outpatient children with acute diarrhea proposed by the Gastroenterology Group of the Italian Society of Pediatrics. Recommendations for hospitalization; Indications for microbiological investigations and treatment; Suggestion of oral rehydration and temporary withdrawal of milk; Refeeding after rehydration.

ORS has led to improved outcome of acute gastroenteritis in both industrialised and developing countries. In both settings there is an increasing demand for active therapy to reduce the duration of diarrhoea and its complications. Persistent diarrhoea is a major consequence of intestinal infections and is responsible for a high number of deaths in poor countries. Bismuth subsalicylate has been used for treatment of acute diarrhoea, with preliminary promising results. In this issue of Acta Paediatrica, a trial with BSS is essential. However the results were marginal and did not justify a mass scale use of BSS, also because of poor cost efficacy rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In past studies, patients with cholera and cholera-like diarrhoea treated with rice oral rehydration solution (ORS) had lower purging rates and a shorter illness duration. We evaluated a new packet form of rice ORS (CeraLyte-90) in 167 boys aged 5 to 15 y, with acute, dehydrating cholera and cholera-like diarrhoea in Bangladesh. The patients were randomized to receive either CeraLyte-90 (n = 85) or glucose ORS (n = 82) and were given early feeding and early antibiotics. The efficacy of the two solutions was compared for stool output during the first 8 h, the first 24 h, and total output, duration of diarrhoea, hematocrit, serum electrolytes and requirement for unscheduled intravenous fluids. The clinical and laboratory characteristics of the two groups were comparable on admission, and most of the patients had cholera (88% and 84% in the CeraLyte and glucose groups, respectively). The mean (± SE) stool output was 20% less in the rice ORS group during the first 8 h of treatment (86.2 ± 6.6 ml/Kg vs 108.8 ± 7.9 ml/Kg, p < 0.05), but the outputs during the other time periods were similar in the two groups, although children in the rice ORS group had slightly more vomiting on day one (p < 0.05). The mean serum electrolyte concentrations in both groups of children remained within normal range. Conclusion: The study documents the safety and efficacy of the new, packaged rice ORS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In a randomized controlled clinical trial, the efficacy of a low-sodium low-glucose oral rehydration solution (ORS) and a low-sodium rice-based ORS was compared with standard WHO glucose ORS in the treatment of severe cholera in children aged 2-10 y. In total, 120 children were evaluated for the study, of whom 58 patients were positive for Vibrio cholerae and were included in the study. Of these 58 cases, 19 received rice-based hypo-osmolar ORS, 20 received WHO-ORS and 19 received glucose-based hypo-osmolar ORS. The clinical characteristics (age, pre-admission duration of diarrhoea, frequency of stool before admission, incidence of vomiting, body weight and volume of initial fluid requirement) were comparable in the three treatment groups. All patients received tetracycline in a dose of 50 mg/kg/d of body weight in 4 divided doses for 3 d. Conclusions: Patients who received rice-based hypo-osmolar ORS had subsequently reduced (p < 0.05) stool output, ORS consumption and diarrhoea duration than the patients who received either WHO-ORS or glucose-based hypo-osmolar ORS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mothers in rural Bangladesh were trained to prepare and use either Rice-ORS (R-ORS) or Glucose-ORS (G-ORS) solutions to treat children with diarrhoea. Families were provided with either G-ORS or R-ORS of the same electrolyte composition through a depot holder. Subsequently, random samples of solutions actually used for treatment by the mothers were collected from homes by field workers. A total of 227 R-ORS and 239 G-ORS samples were analysed. The sodium concentration in about 90% of the samples had a safe range (50-120 mmol/l). Only 4% of R-ORS solutions were above 120 mmol/l in sodium concentration, while 12% of G-ORS solutions exceeded these limits (p < 0.0025). R-ORS (after acid hydrolysis) provided significantly higher glucose (257 ± 42 mmol/l) for active but safe absorption compared to G-ORS (115 ± 39 mmol/l). To make R-ORS liquid enough to drink requires addition of sufficient water, preventing the risk of higher sodium concentration. Unlike rice starch, glucose is a highly soluble substance. It is thus possible to prepare a drinkable solution containing dangerously high concentrations of both sodium and glucose, but this can be minimized by more intensive training of the mothers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Evaluates the oral rehydration solution (ORS) for infantile diarrhoea. Reduction of the duration of diarrhea; Reasons for modifying ORS composition; Effectiveness of ORS in children.

Following the successful rehydration of two moderately dehydrated patients with transient glucose intolerance (TGI) using rice-oral rehydration solution (R-ORS), R-ORS has been used in Hacettepe University Ihsan Dogramacı Children's Hospital Diarrhea Training and Treatment Unit (DTTU) to rehydrate moderately dehydrated children with TGI. The files of children with moderate dehydration and glucose intolerance admitted to the unit were reviewed retrospectively within two periods according to the availability of R-ORS. The clinical and laboratory findings were analysed where available. Before R-ORS became available (September 1993) 6 patients were admitted, all of whom deteriorated with glucose (G)-ORS treatment in 7.0 ± 3.8 h and were hospitalized for i.v. fluid treatment. During the second period 22 moderately dehydrated children with TGI were admitted. The clinical and laboratory characteristics on admission of the children in the two periods were not statistically different (p > 0.05). Among the 22 patients admitted during the second period 10 were administered G-ORS in the unit and 12 had already received G-ORS at home. Clinical and laboratory deterioration was observed in these 10 patients while receiving G-ORS in the unit within 6.3 ± 3.7 h and rehydration was continued with R-ORS. Clinical and laboratory improvement were demonstrated in 8 patients within 18.2 ± 6.5 h. Overall, 17 patients were rehydrated successfully with R-ORS, with a mean time of 18.0 ± 7.2 h. Five patients were hospitalized. The overall success rate of R-ORS was 77.3%. R-ORS may be considered as an alternative mode of therapy to i.v. treatment in the rehydration of moderately dehydrated children with TGI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim To evaluate changes in glomerular filtration rate in acute gastroenteritis. Methods The correlation between two clinical diagnostic scales and glomerular filtration rate has been investigated in 113 children with acute gastroenteritis in a paediatric emergency setting. Results A significant reduction of GFR was found in 10% children less than, and 5% children higher than, 2 years of age with acute gastroenteritis. Conclusion The differences observed as for risk of renal hypoperfusion suggests to consider the age of children as an important determinant to consider the dehydration status in acute gastroenteritis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summarizes guidelines for the treatment of acute diarrhea in children proposed by the working group of the Italian Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology. Comparison of the effectiveness of oral rehydration solution (ORS) and intravenous therapy in rehydrating patients; Absence of effect of ORS on stool volume, stool frequency and duration of diarrhea; Refeeding after rehydration'.