Search

Efforts to minimize the impact of prescribed opioids on future adverse outcomes are reliant on emergency care providers' ability to screen and detect opioid use disorder (OUD). Many prescriptions are initiated in the emergency department (ED) for acute pain; thus, validated measures are especially needed. Our systematic review describes the available opioid-related screening measures identified through search of the available literature. Measures were categorized by intent and applied clinical setting. We found 44 articles, identifying 15 screening measures. Of these, nine were developed to screen for current opioid misuse and five to screen for risk of future opioid misuse. None were created for use outside of a chronic pain setting. Many measures were applied differently from intended purpose. Although several measures are available, screening for adverse opioid outcomes in the ED is hampered by lack of validated instruments. Development of clarified conceptual models and ED-specific research is necessary to limit OUD., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Patients with sickle cell disease frequently seek care in the emergency department. They have reported experiencing negative attitudes from emergency providers. This study was undertaken to evaluate change in emergency provider attitudes toward patients with sickle cell disease over a 2.5-year time period when several educational efforts were ongoing. The General Perceptions about Sickle Cell Disease Patients Scale was used to measure emergency provider attitudes at 2 emergency departments at baseline, 6 months, and 30 months into the project. Analyses of covariance were used to test for effects of site, time, and provider type, as well as their interactions, on Negative attitudes, Uneasiness With Care, and Positive Attitudes subscale scores, after controlling for years of provider experience. The number of surveys returned at the 3 time points was 216, 182, and 113, respectively. The mean Negative Attitudes subscale scores decreased significantly over time, with significantly higher mean Negative Attitudes subscale scores reported by nurses than by physicians. The mean Uneasiness With Care subscale scores did not differ significantly over time, but the mean score was significantly higher for physicians than for nurses. The mean Positive Attitudes subscale scores significantly improved over time, with physicians tending to have a higher mean Positive Attitudes subscale scores than nurses. During the observation period, there was improvement in attitudes, with a decline in mean Negative Attitudes subscale scores and increase in mean Positive Attitudes subscale scores. Physicians reported better attitudes than nurses.

Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) often seek care in the emergency department (ED) for pain associated with vaso-occlusive crises. Research has shown that negative provider attitudes serve as a barrier to care in this patient population. Our aim was to validate a survey that measures attitudes toward SCD patients among ED providers (nurses and physicians) and to compare differences in attitude scores between provider types. We administered the general perceptions about Sickle Cell Disease Patients Scale, previously validated among internal medicine providers, and the Medical Condition Regard Scale (MCRS) to ED nurses and physicians from two EDs. A total of 215 surveys were returned (63% response rate, 200 with attitude items completed). Three subscales were identified: Negative Attitudes, Uneasiness With Care, and Positive Attitudes. Cronbach's αs exceeded 0.81 for each subscale. Mean (SD) scores for the Negative, Uneasiness, and Positive subscales and MCRS were 61.5 (20.3), 66.1 (17.1), 41.2 (17.8), and 42.2 (8.9), respectively. Compared with physicians, nurses had significantly higher mean Negative Attitude scores and lower Uneasiness scores. A slightly modified version of the general perceptions about Sickle Cell Disease Patients Scale appears to be a valid measure of ED provider attitudes toward SCD patients. Among ED providers, this scale identified a dimension not observed in research with the original instrument among internal medicine providers. Provider attitudes influence patient-provider interactions and quality of care. The scale we present here has major clinical implications, particularly for advanced practice nurses, who can use the scale not only to assess providers' attitudes toward SCD patients but also to determine the effectiveness of tailored interventions to improve those attitudes.