Search

For Li‐ion and Na‐ion batteries, the intercalation behavior of graphite anodes is quite different. While Li‐ions intercalate, Na‐ions only co‐intercalate with solvent molecules from the electrolyte solution leading to ternary graphite intercalation compound (t‐GIC) formation along with an expansion of the graphite interlayer spacing to 1.2 nm. This large interlayer spacing represents a micropore with parallel slit geometry. Little is known about t‐GIC formation, but it is commonly believed that throughout the reaction the ion is accompanied by either a full or partial solvation shell. Here, it is elucidated for the first time, using two independent methods – mass measurements and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy – supplemented by operando microscopy, entropymetry and simulations, that the storage mechanism is far more complex. A new model for the electrochemical solvent co‐intercalation process is proposed: As soon as solvated ions enter, the graphite structure is flooded with free solvents, which are subsequently replaced by solvated ions. Close to full sodiation, few free solvents remain and structural rearrangement take place to reach the full storage capacity. Thus, t‐GICs represent a unique case of switchable microporous systems and hence appear as a bridge between ion storage in the bulk phase and in micropores, i.e., between batteries and supercapacitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The co‐intercalation of solvent molecules along with Na+ into the crystal lattice of electrode materials is an undesired process in sodium batteries. An exception is the intercalation of ether solvated alkali ions into graphite, a fast and highly reversible process. Here, reversible co‐intercalation is shown to also be possible for other layered materials, namely titanium disulfide. Operando X‐ray diffraction and dilatometry are used to demonstrate different storage mechanisms for different electrolyte solvents. Diglyme is found to co‐intercalate into the TiS2 leading to a change in the voltage profile and an increase in the interlayer spacing (≈150%). This behavior is different compared to other solvents, which expand much less during Na storage (24% for tetrahydrofuran [THF] and for a carbonate mixture). For all solvents, specific capacities (2nd cycle) exceed 250 mAh g−1 whereas THF exhibited the best stability after 100 cycles. The solvent co‐intercalation is rationalized by density functional theory and linked to the stability of the solvation shells, which is largest for diglyme. Finally, the TiS2 electrode with diglyme electrolyte is paired with a graphite electrode to realize the first proof‐of‐concept solvent co‐intercalation battery, that is, a battery with two electrodes that both rely on reversible co‐intercalation of solvent molecules. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]