Search

CT-P17 (Celltrion, Inc., Incheon, Republic of Korea) is a biosimilar of reference adalimumab (Humira®; AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA), which has recently received regulatory approval from the European Medicines Agency. This analysis was designed to evaluate the stability profile of CT-P17 compared with reference adalimumab and the currently licensed adalimumab biosimilars ABP 501 (Amjevita®/Amgevita®; Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA) and SB5 (Imraldi®; Biogen Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA) when stored at low temperature (5 °C) or room temperature (25 °C) with 60% relative humidity for up to 28 days. Multiple orthogonal and complementary tests demonstrated that CT-P17 was stable for 28 days under all tested conditions, as well as for protein concentrations tested (50 vs 100 mg/mL), type of delivery device (autoinjector vs prefilled syringe), and manufacturing date (recently manufactured vs aged for 17 months). There were slight differences among products in terms of charge variants, oxidation level, purity, and number of subvisible particles; however, overall, the quality of each product was maintained over 28 days. Our data suggest that CT-P17 may be used without any significant loss of stability when stored at 5 °C or 25 °C with 60% relative humidity for up to 28 days, and was not impacted by protein concentration tested and delivery device. Comparative stability data suggest that the appropriate maximum storage period for CT-P17 may be up to 28 days at room temperature with 60% relative humidity.

Introduction Etrolizumab is a novel, dual-action anti-β7 integrin antibody studied in phase 3 trials in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. An autoinjector (AI) is being developed in parallel to complement the prefilled syringe with needle safety device (PFS-NSD) for subcutaneous (SC) administration in these trials. Here we demonstrate the comparable pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and safety of both devices. Methods This randomized, open-label, two-part study in healthy participants evaluated the comparability of etrolizumab exposure between the AI and the PFS-NSD. Part 1 (pilot) involved a small number of participants, and initial results were used to finalize the design of the larger part 2 (pivotal) study. In both parts, participants were randomly assigned to receive a single SC dose of etrolizumab 105 mg by AI or PFS-NSD. Randomization was stratified by body weight. Primary pharmacokinetic outcomes were Cmax, AUClast, and AUC0–inf. Results One hundred and eighty healthy participants (part 1, n = 30; part 2, n = 150) received a single SC dose of etrolizumab by AI or PFS-NSD. Primary pharmacokinetic results from part 1 supported modification of the part 2 study design. Results from part 2 demonstrated that etrolizumab exposure was equivalent between devices, with geometric mean ratios (GMRs) between AI and PFS-NSD of 102% (90% confidence interval [CI] 94.2–111) for Cmax, 98.0% (90% CI 89.3–107) for AUClast, and 97.6% (90% CI 88.6–107) for AUC0–inf. Median tmax and mean terminal t1/2 were also similar between devices. GMRs and 90% CIs of all primary pharmacokinetic parameters were fully contained within the predefined equivalence limits (80–125%). Conclusion This pharmacokinetic study demonstrated that single SC injections of etrolizumab 105 mg using an AI or a PFS-NSD resulted in equivalent etrolizumab exposure and similar safety and tolerability in healthy participants. Taken together, these results support the use of an AI for etrolizumab administration. Trial Registration NCT02996019.