Search

Multi-objective optimization in aerodynamics plays an important role in revealing trade-offs between conflicting objectives in order to discover important knowledge and insight for better future design. Of interest here is the use of Kriging surrogate models incorporated into a sequential Bayesian optimization (BO) strategy. In this paper, we studied four variants of multi-objective BO (MOBO) techniques that are based on expected improvement (EI), that is, Euclidean-based EI (EEI), expected hypervolume improvement (EHVI), ParEGO, and expected inverted penalty boundary intersection improvement (EIPBII) to understand their capabilities on handling multi-objective aerodynamic optimization problems. Numerical tests were performed on a set consisting of six generalized Schaffer problems (GSP), five low-fidelity, and one high-fidelity airfoil design problems. Results suggest that EHVI is the only method which consistently performed well on artificial and aerodynamic problems. EEI yields the worst performance and is not suitable to deal with various problem complexities. ParEGO, although it performs modestly on GSP, surprisingly works well on the low- and high-fidelity problems. On the other hand, EIPBII encounters the opposite case, where it is one of the best performer on GSP but yields modest performance on the aerodynamic problems. In light of the results, we suggest that EHVI is a highly potential MOBO method to be applied for multi-objective aerodynamic design optimization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Optimal non-planar wing planform geometries for a Mach 2.2 45-seat supersonic transport are generated using Kriging-based Bayesian optimisation techniques on a 22-variable, 3-objective problem for two wing-loading conditions. Sonic boom loudness, drag, and root bending moment are simultaneously minimised at a fixed lift. A Python-based framework is developed for rapid evaluation of designs in a parallel computation environment, automating conceptual geometry generation, optimised mesh griding, Euler CFD evaluation, and thermoviscous atmospheric boom propagation. An empirical turbulent skin friction coefficient is used to correct the Euler drag and an estimate of wave drag is performed. Self-organising maps and polynomial chaos expansion Shapley effects are used to explore the design variables and their associated sensitivities with respect to the design objectives. A geometric centroid-based proxy for trim is used to filter the results; feasible extreme designs and a compromise design are compared and discussed. The results indicate a trade-off between each of the three objectives due to competing design requirements, however an improvement in two of the objective functions is possible by sacrificing the remaining objective. One possible compromise solution reduces the root bending moment coefficient by 25% and the sonic boom loudness by 24% at the cost of a 5% increase in drag. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]