Search

Background Day care is an important service for some people with dementia and their carers. In Ireland, day care services for people with dementia are delivered by a mix of dementia specific day-care centres and generic centres that cater for people with dementia to various degrees. In this paper we map the geographic variation in the supply of day care services for people with dementia relative to potential need. Methods Using a national HSE survey of day care centres, we estimate the current supply of day care services for people with dementia in both generic and dementia specific centres by combining a number of qualitative and quantitative measures. To identify the variation in supply, we map day care provision at local and regional levels to the number of people with dementia in the area. To consider geographic accessibility, we map and analyse the population living outside the catchment area of the day care centres. Results There is significant variation across the country in the existing capacity of day care centres to cater for people with dementia. The number of places per 100 persons with dementia varies from 9 to 16 across the Community Health Organisation areas. We show that 20 per cent of people with dementia are not living within a 15km radius of a day care centre that caters for people with dementia. Conclusion Day care has a place in the menu of service for people with dementia living in the community. As the number of people with dementia grows, investment in day care centres needs to be targeted to areas of greatest need. In many parts of the country, the current day care centres have limited capacity to provide a service for people with dementia that live in their catchment area. There is considerable geographical inequity in day care provision for people with dementia across the country. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Developed by Blackhall et al. (2011), the Validation, Emotion, Reassure, Activity (VERA) communication framework seeks to provide student nurses with a guide to provide person-centred care to people living with dementia. The framework aims to enable the caregiver to communicate with the person living with dementia in a respectful manner, and accept that there is both value and meaning to the person's speech and behaviour. This paper presents the findings from a small pilot control pre-post study which aimed to explore the impact of the VERA framework to promote person-centred communication between student nurses and older people with dementia in long term care. Methods A control group of six students, received standard communication training and ten students received additional communication training using the VERA framework. Data was collected using the non-participant observational tool Quality of Interactions Schedule (QUIS) and three self-assessment questionnaires to assess student nurses' confidence, dementia knowledge and communication skills. Results The results of this study found that those students who received the additional VERA communication training were observed to have a significantly (Mann-Whitney U test; p = <0.05) reduced number of negative interactions with people with dementia than those students who had received standard communication training alone. In addition, student nurses trained in the VERA framework showed a significant increase (Mann-Whitney U test; p = <0.05) in their confidence to care for people with dementia than those who had received standard communication skills training. Conclusion The study finding need to be interpreted with caution given the small sample size and the pilot nature of the study. Nevertheless, these findings indicate that the VERA framework has the potential to improve (1) person-centred communication between student nurses and older people with dementia and (2) students' confidence to care for people with dementia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Currently, 1 in 10 people diagnosed with dementia in Ireland are aged under 65, this is termed "Younger Onset Dementia" (YOD). Though small in numbers these figures (4000 people) are increasing, and important differences exist between people diagnosed with (PwYOD) and those diagnosed with later onset dementia (LOD). As dementia is normally associated with advancing age, clinicians are not always on the alert for its diagnosis in younger people. Diagnosing YOD can be especially challenging since presentation may be atypical and there is a lack of clinical ownership in this area. Methods A structured literature review was conducted to identify optimum models of diagnostic processes and pathways for PwYOD. Two research questions were addressed: (i) what models for the diagnosis of PwYOD exist nationally and internationally, and what evidence supports these and (ii) what are the differences between diagnostic processes and pathways for PwYOD compared with PwLOD. A systematic search strategy was devised to identify all relevant scientific papers. Key databases were used, supplemented by grey literature searches. A narrative synthesis approach was undertaken to assess the literature identified. Results Pathways and processes to the diagnosis of YOD are unclear and complex and compared with LOD, diagnosis takes more time. PwYOD are more likely to have multiple referrals to different specialists, have their memory and cognitive complaints misattributed to other factors such as depression and experience longer delays in obtaining a diagnosis. Conclusion Few evidence-based best-practice models or guidelines for the diagnosis of YOD exist internationally. Increased awareness of the signs and symptoms of YOD among all healthcare professionals is necessary. There is a need for improved linkages to be developed between Geriatric Medicine, Neurology, Psychiatry, and Primary Care services and in certain instances for suspected cases of YOD to be referred to neurology-led memory clinics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]